HK vs Bose.. Which one is better?
HK vs Bose
The best Bose system to this date has been introduced on the Acura RL. Many say it sounds better than the Mark Levinson systems in Lexus. I did drive and test the RL and it is way better than the ELS/Panasonic DVD-A system in my TL.
As a side note, I am also impressed with the mp3 capability of the CD changer and DVD slot. between the two, you can keep about 7.5 gigs of music in your car, with easy access and track and title info on both the Comand display and in dash display! Consider the AUX input (that works very well (with impressive signal to noise ratio - much better than could be achieved with a cassete or FM adapter or other kludge) or the new iPod integration kit soon to be available and I think it all adds up to one of the best OEM systems available. Granted, you could spend $2,000 and significantly improve the sound, but I am pretty happy with it just the way it is.
The CD Changer and DVD slot will give you 640MB X 6 = 4GB and the changer >if< dual layer will give you 8GB a total of 12GB.. If the player is single layer only it will give you 8GB as you said.. Which is great. Have you tried a dual layer disk in there?
The Bose system in the SL55 has no bass below 60 Hz or so, and a huge mid-bass hump that you can't tune out with the tone controls. The treble is spitty and has lots of intermodulation distortion, even at middling volume levels. There is no image at all. Bose home systems are known for fuzzy imaging, a tradition that goes all the way back to 1968 and the Bose 901, which aimed one driver at the listener, and 8 at the back wall.
I suspect quite a negotiation between the auto manufacturer and the sound system manufacturer takes place, with the auto manufacturer holding the high hand in that they get to specify how much they'll pay, resulting in different quality of sound in different vehicles.
Jim
Trending Topics
Both systems are lacking on various areas.. Bose is muddy , the HK is tinny to me.
The alternative is to let someone rip your 50K car and install a nice system for $1500-$2000 which would blow the stock system away.
Having been in the car audio business I prefer to leave my car alone. These cars are too quirky, adding aftermarket audio is a problem waiting to happen.
I just play my HK system at a decent volume and deal with it.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
When I first heard that HK was doing the W211 I was not wield about it. The HK BMW systems of the middle and late 90s was TRUE garbage. They sounded awful! They had all these little features and sound options, but they all were impure.
Bose, like stated before, tends to have problems with base, but when the systems came out they were much better than the regular stock systems. When I listened to my HK system I was very impressed. I was expecting something like the older BMW HK systems.
I actually own Bose speakers for my house (strictly due to decor issues and space constraints). But, I think that the HK sound system is acceptable (at least, and sounds better than the W210's Bose system.
Just remember, it is a stock system, as far as they go, I think that the HK is fine.
Steve
Steve
I've heard the Blose system in the S and SL. While to the casual observer they sound good and loud, a more thorough investigation reveals that the sound is not all that good. Sounds like the entire Blose marketing plan. It sounds very artificial.
The stock Pioneer unit in my Lexus was very good, and overall much better than the HK. You couldn't crank it too loud either, but it did sound good all the way through the db range. In that case, I think the speakers make a huge difference.




