Blinking Brakelights
That is a very good summary!
I have always been a big proponent of amber turn signals, and that was one of the reasons why I did not (and will not) consider the 2010 W212, W204, or any other vehicle (MB or not) that has RED TURN SIGNALS. Sure they're LED, and sure they're bright... but they are situated so close to the brake lights (sandwiched between them) that it can be very confusing to the drivers behind you and cause their braking reaction to be delayed (in accidents, even milliseconds can count). VW's and Range Rover's current red blinkers are terribly designed as well... even worse than the W212's IMO!

The NHTSA's thinking (on this issue among other things... such as their mandated crash test conditions) is archaic, selfish, and unrealistic. In fact, much of the U.S.'s vehicle laws and conditions are unrealistic and/or outdated (such as CA's regulation on foglamp use only with headlights).

Actually, many things North American organizations do and regulate don't make much sense at all (or make "less" sense than changing)... the most predominant example I can think of is changing from the Standard System of Measurements (which only a few countries use, the U.S. being the main one) to the Metric System (which most of the rest of the world uses).
In fact, i've been staring at them in awe at how great they look. But i guess that's just me, and MB enthusiasts if i may be so bold to add.
Then the 221 comes out and only the tiny bottom row is lit up for both regular lighting AND braking, very unneffective and doesn't make use of that big lighting structure. The cars to follow got the same lazy approach.
Just chalk it up to things that I feel M-B has dropped the ball on. Full L.E.D's are cute and all, but clearly some cost saving had to counter the extra costs of them, as the lighting units in terms of delegating different actions to different areas on it have actually gotten much simpler.
I remeber it was a lot of anger at the E60 forum when the facelifted BMW 5-series got from orange to red turn signals in the US.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I wonder the same thing, as it would cost more for MB to purchase lower volumes of both colored LED bulbs from the supplier than one larger volume of a single-colored LED bulb. If the LED bulbs are pre-built into the tail light housing (as I suspect), then it's even MORE COSTLY for MB, as now they don't only have to worry about 2 little bulbs, but 2 completely different tail light housings (all due to different blinker colors). Also one must factor in the additional cost/hassle/effort into separating, assembling, and controlling 2 different part numbers meant for several different countries as well (one wrong shipment could spell disaster for a vehicle production line).
IMO I don't think it would be a big issue, as 2 vehicles (1 with red blinkers, 1 with amber) would look exactly the same with the blinkers OFF (the blinker lens is clear for both tail light assemblies). The only time you would notice a difference is when the blinkers are lit... which is exactly the time you WANT cars around you to notice your blinkers. If amber blinkers gives my vehicle a higher visibility to other drivers (whether 5% or 50% more), then those are the blinkers that I want.

And honestly, I think amber blinkers look MUCH BETTER than red since all blinkers (front, mirror, rear) would be the same color (amber). I personally think that mis-matched blinkers (amber front/mirror + red rear) looks extremely tacky... like a guy wearing a lime-green shirt with a pink & brown striped tie.
Last edited by chokaay; Mar 9, 2010 at 08:47 AM.
The S-Class wasn't the only one that did that... the current SL, C, E... basically all recent "face-lifted" or changed cars use their tail light LEDs as brake lights too (ie: no completely separate brake light). However you are right, the S, SL, and a few others only utilize the bottom bar in the whole tail light assembly, which "wastes" the upper portion. Looks a little "classier", but utilizes less "real estate" which MAY potentially help reaction time from drivers behind you (no testing has been done to my knowledge).
Then the 221 comes out and only the tiny bottom row is lit up for both regular lighting AND braking, very unneffective and doesn't make use of that big lighting structure. The cars to follow got the same lazy approach.
Just chalk it up to things that I feel M-B has dropped the ball on. Full L.E.D's are cute and all, but clearly some cost saving had to counter the extra costs of them, as the lighting units in terms of delegating different actions to different areas on it have actually gotten much simpler.
+1
I used to associate this unique feature as being strictly European; one bulb/cluster for the night time taillight and a 2nd bulb for the "brakes applied" light. To me, this is a better way of distinguishing taillights from a "hey, I'm stopping" situation.
Especially on the 221, it doesn't make any sense to me at all that MB would not utilize the upper portion of the taillight cluster for anything...it's just dead reflector space

My older (07) BMW still has the dual function setup, but as of late, the 5 and 7 redesigns are heading toward this single LED stoplight/regular taillight function. Seems like everyone is heading toward this fad after Audi first started it
And honestly, I think amber blinkers look MUCH BETTER than red since all blinkers (front, mirror, rear) would be the same color (amber). I personally think that mis-matched blinkers (amber front/mirror + red rear) looks extremely tacky... like a guy wearing a lime-green shirt with a pink & brown striped tie.

Mismatched turn signal lights look VERY domestic IMHO. GM and Ford come to mind with the orange fronts, side markers in the mirrors, and then the RED rear turn signals. Looks tacky...
I used to associate this unique feature as being strictly European; one bulb/cluster for the night time taillight and a 2nd bulb for the "brakes applied" light. To me, this is a better way of distinguishing taillights from a "hey, I'm stopping" situation.
Especially on the 221, it doesn't make any sense to me at all that MB would not utilize the upper portion of the taillight cluster for anything...it's just dead reflector space

My older (07) BMW still has the dual function setup, but as of late, the 5 and 7 redesigns are heading toward this single LED stoplight/regular taillight function. Seems like everyone is heading toward this fad after Audi first started it
Yeah, I just can't get over the W221's structure, pretty ridiculous IMO, huge lighting structure, but most of it is dead space when it comes to lighting. W221 E, W220 S, etc. have literally use from all areas of the taillight.
The face-lift 221 S I think makes use of the whole structure if I'm not mistaken, but it's now either fully lit up (like a Christmas tree mind you), and when the Brake is pressed, it just lights up brighter, better than before, but still could be more clever IMO.
Thanks for the help in advance.

Exactly what I was thinking. I think it looks great. Plus, not really a big deal to me either way.
The NHTSA's thinking (on this issue among other things... such as their mandated crash test conditions) is archaic, selfish, and unrealistic. In fact, much of the U.S.'s vehicle laws and conditions are unrealistic and/or outdated (such as CA's regulation on foglamp use only with headlights).







