HOLD Feature awesomeness
Yeah, my Auto Hold on this car I have to press every time I start the car to engage it. However, obviously you'd engage it when you get into a traffic condition you most likely would want to use it. It's pretty convenient and definitely more smooth (i.e no having to push a brake hard with your foot) and "trick" than the E's, but I find myself using it very little, so far.... go figure.




This post just does not make any sense. The brake lights also lit up when you keep your foot on the brake pedal. Hold make only the difference that you don't have to keep pressing on the pedal to keep car stationary during long red light etc.
I'll pass on the abuse.
Pulling up at traffic lights, you should use the hand brake when the stop lights do NOT come on.
Some of you must know who the IAM are but those who do not; the letters stand for the 'Institute of Advanced Motorists'. In their opinion it is BAD MANNERS to keep your foot on the brake pedal when stationary as it is dazzling to drivers behind.
I am in the UK where we have a law against using High Intensity rear lights, in addition to normal rear lights, unless used during inclement weather. I am sure many of you have travelled behind cars with these lights unnecessarily turned on and have been dazzled for long distances. If you can see the normal rear lights from a reasonable distance, there is no need to turn on the High Intensity lights.
Now imagine being stationary behind a Mercedes with its beautiful set of very bright stop lights dazzling you for a few minutes at every set of traffic lights.
Now imagine following half a dozen Mercedes, all of them with their glaring lights dazzling each other and everyone else. Is that a design feature that we all want? I certainly don't and I don't use the function. It's called being considerate to other road users!
I'll pass on the abuse.
Pulling up at traffic lights, you should use the hand brake when the stop lights do NOT come on.
Some of you must know who the IAM are but those who do not; the letters stand for the 'Institute of Advanced Motorists'. In their opinion it is BAD MANNERS to keep your foot on the brake pedal when stationary as it is dazzling to drivers behind.
I am in the UK where we have a law against using High Intensity rear lights, in addition to normal rear lights, unless used during inclement weather. I am sure many of you have travelled behind cars with these lights unnecessarily turned on and have been dazzled for long distances. If you can see the normal rear lights from a reasonable distance, there is no need to turn on the High Intensity lights.
Now imagine being stationary behind a Mercedes with its beautiful set of very bright stop lights dazzling you for a few minutes at every set of traffic lights.
Now imagine following half a dozen Mercedes, all of them with their glaring lights dazzling each other and everyone else. Is that a design feature that we all want? I certainly don't and I don't use the function. It's called being considerate to other road users!
of other cars tail lights.....
you're obviously refurring to manual cars for the hand brake?
Mercedes is unusual to have a 'foot brake' for a hand brake but a lot of cars now have a 'button' but the function remains the same. It becomes more difficult to use the handbrake in an automatic and that is why all sorts of anti-creep has been used to some success. I loved the HOLD function till I realised the brake lights were lit
. Now I only use it if there is no one behind me and use the hand brake if I am held up for long. I try hard not to dazzle others, especially at night when the car behind is close, but oftentimes it is unavoidable in automatics.
I brought the problem to the dealers notice but he failed to acknowledge it. I wrote to the IAM and posted their response to Mercedes Customer Relations but was told that this is a safety feature!
Go figure.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I'll pass on the abuse.
Pulling up at traffic lights, you should use the hand brake when the stop lights do NOT come on.
Some of you must know who the IAM are but those who do not; the letters stand for the 'Institute of Advanced Motorists'. In their opinion it is BAD MANNERS to keep your foot on the brake pedal when stationary as it is dazzling to drivers behind.
I am in the UK where we have a law against using High Intensity rear lights, in addition to normal rear lights, unless used during inclement weather. I am sure many of you have travelled behind cars with these lights unnecessarily turned on and have been dazzled for long distances. If you can see the normal rear lights from a reasonable distance, there is no need to turn on the High Intensity lights.
Now imagine being stationary behind a Mercedes with its beautiful set of very bright stop lights dazzling you for a few minutes at every set of traffic lights.
Now imagine following half a dozen Mercedes, all of them with their glaring lights dazzling each other and everyone else. Is that a design feature that we all want? I certainly don't and I don't use the function. It's called being considerate to other road users!




Well, this I don't believe. If it was holding the car on P then there would be a little movement when I take my foot off of the brake pedal after HOLD is engaged. My car does not move at all, it is like brakes hold it, which is what I believe also happens.


I'm done with the ignorance.
I'd have thought anyone owning a Merc would have a couple of grey cells between their ears but these mails prove otherwise.
For those who posed questions, read up:
https://www.gov.uk/general-rules-all...nts-113-to-116
These are not my views. This is the LAW.

I'm done with the ignorance.
I'd have thought anyone owning a Merc would have a couple of grey cells between their ears but these mails prove otherwise.
For those who posed questions, read up:
https://www.gov.uk/general-rules-all...nts-113-to-116
These are not my views. This is the LAW.
If it's a law to not have super bright brake lights flashing the guy behind you, then in your area automakers should have applied a way that it doesn't do so under normal braking, until then, Brake Hold should act as what it truly is: the brakes being applied, whether or not it's by your foot is irrelevant to the car behind you.
Brake Hold is a LUXURY, remember that, they have no "rules of Brake Hold" to follow aside from having them act EXACTLY like real brakes. There's no reason to go barking at a car manufacturer for not conforming it to your own viewpoints, be them quirky or not.



Very considerate of you indeed. I am sure those behind you really applaud you for saving their eyes from bright lights
I'm not sure you can do it remotely... You put the key in the door lock and turn it all the way to the right and and all windows open.
How do accomplish this with my Mercedes? Do the same thing?





