E 550 RWD?
The E would be a civilized hot sedan used and driven selectively. The 4Matic is parasitic to HP and my driving enjoyment. I am also considering the new CLS, but am unsure if I would prefer the stealth blend of an E vs the look at me presence of the CLS. A Renn Tech flash will be fit to either soon after delivery.
I'm not sure I agree. Based on MB published figures E550 RWD is 5.2 and E550 4MATIC is 5.3 to 60. I would hardly call that parasitic. I understand you want your thrill but I think the 4MATIC system serves the vast majority of MB drivers well and keep them out of trouble on dry and wet pavement alike. It also gives you much more steady and surefooted acceleration from a standstill FWIW.
One maybe able to get away in E350 Rwd under any conditions with proper tires, but E550 (with its massive torque) will definitely benefit by 4matic (still with the same proper tires) under most adverse conditions.
Get it to your head - 4matic does not mean snow, even though it seems that's how MB's 4matic allocations work. One must understand that AWD "options" cost money, and most people in the "sun belt" do not want spending it since they "do not need it as awd=snow". Hence MB sells rwd MLs here as well.
There is a ton of Audi Quattros in FL - no one complains. Personally experienced its benefits when once a rear wheel hit an unnoticed deep puddle on a highway at night - there would be a high chance of losing control or even spinning had it been a rwd at the velocity I was traveling at (yes, I'm not "a responsible adult").
Last edited by threeMBs; Feb 24, 2012 at 09:54 AM.

One maybe able to get away in E350 awd under any conditions with proper tires, but E550 (with its massive torque) will definetely benefit by 4matic (still with the same proper tires) under most adverse conditions.
Get it to your head - 4matic does not mean snow, even though it seems that's how MB's 4matic allocations work. There is a ton of Audi Quattros in FL - noone complains. Personally expirienced its benefits when once a rear wheel hit an unnoticed deep poddle on a highway at night - there would be a high chance of losing control or even spining had it been a rwd at the velocity I was traveling at (yes, I'm not "a responsible adult").
PS - I HATE poddles
PS: fixed it for your reading pleasure.
Last edited by threeMBs; Feb 24, 2012 at 09:51 AM.

On my STI, I had custom ECU maps done for the SI-Drive System. One was a "no boost" map; that in conjunction with the the differential locked at 50/50 and performance A/S tires was barely livable in DC winters. Switch to a normal map and it was nothing but wheelspin in the white stuff. The same solution on proper winter rubber would have been much more capable.
I also learned how to drive in a RWD V8 station wagon in upstate NY winters west of Buffalo along Lake Erie, so that helps a lot.
But I learned to drive on snow and ice while delivering papers in Amarillo, TX. I lived in Boston too, and the snow/ice was much more challenging in Amarillo (these are different time periods, so maybe the comparison is not fair). Amarillo did not have plows and did not salt. It didn't snow or ice often enough to warrant the expense. Amarillo streets also have deep drainage ditches at most secondary intersections. So ice would build up at night (when I delivered papers) and there'd be huge ruts. There was no choice but to learn to drive "rally-style" - barrel in and keep the car moving. Couldn't get stuck because no one was around to help. Did it in a FWD Ford something or another.
My daily driver in Boston was a Porsche Boxster (RWD). Never had a problem because the streets were always clean.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
But, the performance potential of the new 2012 poweplant is what has my interest. A 4.6L Twin Turbo V8, once tuned, will make some serious hp and torque. So for the $25K (approximate) price variance between the E 550 and E 63...a RWD, badge delete, lowered and tuned E 550 would suit me just fine.
Older E63's beware... of the tuned turbos. Smoke'm if you got'm boys!
You should go test drive a CLS 550 2WD and 4MATIC back-to-back - I think it would sway you toward 4MATIC if you're concerned about stoplight drags. Be warned, however, that the ESP sucks in the non-AMGs. It can only be defeated in Dyno mode.
One maybe able to get away in E350 Rwd under any conditions with proper tires, but E550 (with its massive torque) will definitely benefit by 4matic (still with the same proper tires) under most adverse conditions.
Get it to your head - 4matic does not mean snow, even though it seems that's how MB's 4matic allocations work. One must understand that AWD "options" cost money, and most people in the "sun belt" do not want spending it since they "do not need it as awd=snow". Hence MB sells rwd MLs here as well.
There is a ton of Audi Quattros in FL - no one complains. Personally experienced its benefits when once a rear wheel hit an unnoticed deep puddle on a highway at night - there would be a high chance of losing control or even spinning had it been a rwd at the velocity I was traveling at (yes, I'm not "a responsible adult").
Last edited by ImInPA; Feb 24, 2012 at 12:16 PM.
An E350 CDI 4 MATIC gets as worse as 14lt/100 km in city wheras E350 CDI gets a better fuel consumption like 11 lt/100 km in same conditions
I would like to have $ MAtic I mean 4 MATIC
http://www.baileycar.com/winterdrive_html.html
and
http://www.eclassbenz.com/buyers-gui...l-wheel-drive/
Glad the first points out that AWD shines on hills, which is why I need my 4matic. I love blasting past the neighbors stuck on the hill!









