E 550 RWD?
The E would be a civilized hot sedan used and driven selectively. The 4Matic is parasitic to HP and my driving enjoyment. I am also considering the new CLS, but am unsure if I would prefer the stealth blend of an E vs the look at me presence of the CLS. A Renn Tech flash will be fit to either soon after delivery.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
2. Lived in northeast for 30 years. That rain does not even compare to #1 above.
Last edited by threeMBs; Feb 23, 2012 at 05:10 PM.
Last edited by Turbo3Six; Feb 23, 2012 at 08:50 PM.
The main point is that very few of us will need to worry about these things EXCEPT under conditions that make 4matic useful!
But, the performance potential of the new 2012 poweplant is what has my interest. A 4.6L Twin Turbo V8, once tuned, will make some serious hp and torque. So for the $25K (approximate) price variance between the E 550 and E 63...a RWD, badge delete, lowered and tuned E 550 would suit me just fine.
Older E63's beware... of the tuned turbos. Smoke'm if you got'm boys!
The main point is that very few of us will need to worry about these things EXCEPT under conditions that make 4matic useful!
Check out:
http://www.rallycars.com/Cars/4wd_turbo_cars.html
I've quoted its conclusion for our discussion:
Most people have the wrong impression that 4WD is only useful on slippery roads and conditions. The best argument against this impression is to drive all three types of vehicle (front or rear wheel drive) on a dry tortuous road. In the first tight corner try extracting the car at the limit of its tires' grip and see what happens. Wheel spin is simply unavoidable.
A front wheel drive car will have its inside wheel spinning and will almost stall in the absence of a self locking differential. The only choice left to its driver is to lift off.
A rear wheel drive car will also have its inside wheel spinning and will get into oversteer. In the absence of a self locking differential the driver, apart from counter-steering, will have to ease on the gas pedal if he is to avoid exiting the road.
A full time 4 wheel drive car can negotiate the same corner with the gas pedal almost floored...
Last edited by ttoE550; Feb 23, 2012 at 10:32 PM. Reason: clarity
The type of vehicle that's best for you depends on the conditions you typically face. for most drivers, four-wheel drive might be overkill. The 4-Wheel-Drive Myth - Podcast
The type of vehicle that's best for you depends on the conditions you typically face. for most drivers, four-wheel drive might be overkill. The 4-Wheel-Drive Myth - Podcast
The point of the podcast is probably correct. Most people don't need 4matic most of the time. Probably most don't need it ever. Fair enough.
But I must've forgotten my meds this evening. The &*%($ about acceleration is simplistic. Loose quotes "AWD makes you go faster, but doesn't make you stop more quickly." The connotation is that folks with AWD floor their cars and drive 60 mph on 4 inches of ice, completely forgetting that they must stop when the child chases the snowball into the street.
But trying to climb the hill leading from my neighborhood to the first major street is all about acceleration. The areas I need to drive and the climate in my area (D.C.) probably say that -- broadly speaking -- I don't need 4matic. Consumer Reports would laugh at the money I've wasted. Yeah, right. If I want to leave home, I need the acceleration afforded by the 4matic to get up that freakin' hill. Otherwise, I'd have an E63.
Don't hate me because I can accelerate on snow!








