My Ford Focus is Better than Your Mercedes.

equipment in the trunk, weighs a hell of a lot more than that old Merc.
I was stunned by the results of the crash. The Merc had collapsed roughly back to the area of the windshield. The passenger compartment was intact. The driver was, as they say, treated and released. The patrol car was flat out demolished, although some of the damage was due to rescue having to pry the officer out. He is lucky to be alive and is being treated for multiple trauma, most of it very serious.
No, it's not safe to make sweeping assumptions about relative safety based upon this one incident, given there are so many variables involved in accident reconstruction.
But one thing is for sure, after seeing something like this: rightly or wrongly, I feel just a little more secure getting into my "over-priced" car every day. For those of you driving the full size sedan, even more so.

They fixed it quite well with the facelift.
However, as I always say.... even in that horrible showing of the pre-facelift W210.... M-B's have never been crash statistic champions (except for the newest line which actually performs remarkably in standardized tests as well), in fact, statistics are NEVER what M-B's are about, they avoid headline grabbing stats for the true, real, and bonafide holistic experience, however the W210 was proven to be the safest real world vehicle on the roads, with the lowest death rate of any cars period during its entire production run. That's what M-B's are truly about.

All things being equal I'm a numbers guy and I'd prefer to be in the car with the better proven crash test results.
With the video I was just pointing out with all the Mercedes quality control they managed to release a horrible E class safety-wise and it is only after the crash videos came out that they addressed the safety issues. There is nothing more important in a car than safety and with the recent models Mercedes seems to understand that and that is good for us all.
Last edited by WEBSRFR; May 12, 2012 at 04:59 PM.
BTW:
You want to try something fun? Whenever those Napoleon-Complex'ers use this "comparison" to compensate their "whatever car" for your "overpriced car", use the Thread topic to talk about a Focus VS Phantom, or better yet, Equus VS Phantom. The higher price the car gets, the far less it is technically "worth it", and surprisingly, you'll find many "features" missing compared to cars that cost a fraction of it.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

All things being equal I'm a numbers guy and I'd prefer to be in the car with the better proven crash test results.
With the video I was just pointing out with all the Mercedes quality control they managed to release a horrible E class safety-wise and it is only after the crash videos came out that they addressed the safety issues. There is nothing more important in a car than safety and with the recent models Mercedes seems to understand that and that is good for us all.
I remember how dismayed I was to see a Mercedes door come open during that crash test. Safety performance has increased across the board with Ford demonstrating strong crash performance. The way I look at it you will get a better value with a Ford because the R&D is amortized over a larger number of cars. Mercedes provides that something extra that makes sense for a smaller segment of the market. A Ford Fusion is a good car but it is built to cost so it's architecture is front wheel drive. Not optimum for driving dynamics.
Last edited by MBNUT1; May 13, 2012 at 10:57 AM.
Yes, my car is kind of a XXth Anniversary edition of the very first car I could call my own. An all black Olds Starfire 2 door hardtop with an all-red interior.
I wrote "XXth" not because I don't want anyone to know how old I am, but because I can't bring myself to admit it.
Anyway, if you're healthy, age is as they say just a number; it evaporates quickly when I step on the gas of this slick "pillarless coupe." MB-speak for two door hardtop. What goes around comes around.
I think the point the OP was trying to make is that a while ago, luxury cars were distinct because of the high-end features that they offered and they were not available in less expensive cars.
The point the OP made was that now you have to get a very well loaded Mercedes E class (face it, most cars are not loaded to the brim with options) to match the features of the Ford Focus. I tend to agree with that. My E550 is fully loaded with P2, pan. roof, etc., but I feel a bit short-changed when I look at some Hyundais and see not only the same features but other features in those cars that I can't even get as an option in my car -- such as head's up display for the Nav...
I think the point that the OP was making is that Mercedes needs to offer more features and generally take things up a notch in terms of what they offer in cars that cost as much as they do. When you can buy a Ford or Hyundai with more features than an E class, something is wrong. Heated seats, parking sensors, blind spot monitoring, etc., are no longer "luxury" features. Mercedes needs to take their game up a few notches.
At the end this will be good for us all! SO there's no arguing the point that the auto industry is getting more competitive and offer more. We just need our favorite German brand to not fall behind and indeed stay ahead of everyone else to justify what we pay.
Apart from all that I find it interesting that you took the time to comment on a "BS thread"
I think the point the OP was trying to make is that a while ago, luxury cars were distinct because of the high-end features that they offered and they were not available in less expensive cars.
The point the OP made was that now you have to get a very well loaded Mercedes E class (face it, most cars are not loaded to the brim with options) to match the features of the Ford Focus. I tend to agree with that. My E550 is fully loaded with P2, pan. roof, etc., but I feel a bit short-changed when I look at some Hyundais and see not only the same features but other features in those cars that I can't even get as an option in my car -- such as head's up display for the Nav...
I think the point that the OP was making is that Mercedes needs to offer more features and generally take things up a notch in terms of what they offer in cars that cost as much as they do. When you can buy a Ford or Hyundai with more features than an E class, something is wrong. Heated seats, parking sensors, blind spot monitoring, etc., are no longer "luxury" features. Mercedes needs to take their game up a few notches.
At the end this will be good for us all! SO there's no arguing the point that the auto industry is getting more competitive and offer more. We just need our favorite German brand to not fall behind and indeed stay ahead of everyone else to justify what we pay.
Apart from all that I find it interesting that you took the time to comment on a "BS thread"

saved me some typing, exactly what i was going to say.
Yes, my car is kind of a XXth Anniversary edition of the very first car I could call my own. An all black Olds Starfire 2 door hardtop with an all-red interior.
I wrote "XXth" not because I don't want anyone to know how old I am, but because I can't bring myself to admit it.
Anyway, if you're healthy, age is as they say just a number; it evaporates quickly when I step on the gas of this slick "pillarless coupe." MB-speak for two door hardtop. What goes around comes around.

.
Small cars with auto trans. (16 listed):
Elantra #2, Score 80
Focus #10, Score 68
Upscale sedans (15 listed)
Hyundai Genesis 3.8 #1, Score 92, among the higher scores of any type vehicle tested.
Luxury sedans (22 listed)
Mercedes E350 Blue-Tec #5, Score 89
Hyundai Genesis 4.6 #6, Score 87
Mercedes E350 Gas #14, Score 79.
There are other categories. I could go on. I won’t.
To sum up, CR loves the newer Hyundai vehicles. After a rocky start, there now does appear to be genuine value in the marq.
I know, I know already. And I agree with you. Please don’t shoot the messenger! Just FYI.
I will continue to put most MB vehicles at the top of my own list, for many reasons.
Sure you get all the options in a Nissan and Ford these days, but only when they are dirt cheap to make and cheap to purchase a patent on.
Benz had Cell phones in cars since the 80s. Electric ride control that Cadillac is so eager to point out came and went in the 90s. Keyless go also started in 90s. Bluetooth connectivity was available in my 2001 C Class. Benz had spent allot of money on R&D on everything that goes in their cars and always have it years before anyone else. Sure you can get all the same options in a cheaper car these days, but i chose to go with car manufacturer that actually prides itself on coming up with things for themselves and not just purchasing the technology from someone.
Im sure i will have some people saying i don’t know what im talking about as Benz didn’t do this first or purchased that from somewhere..... and i will not dispute as i do not have all of the facts... but a general statement I think still stands.
If ford would make a car for 20 grand that looked as appealing to me as benz or even some BMWs and drove like one I would not hesitate to look in to it. Just because your car can park itself is not going to win me over. And by the way Lexus had it firs I believe.
I do like the look of some of the new fords that are coming out, but that’s because they look like Austin Martin.
I would rather enjoy the feel and drive of a basic Benz or BMW than fully loaded corolla, focus or altima.
Also, it is true about M-B introducing so much. Keyless Go, the friggin' SEATBELT AND AIRBAGS for f's sake. M-B has like over a million patents on automobiles, many of which they never collected royalties on, for the goodness of "safety for all", i.e Seatbelts, Airbags, etc.
Last edited by K-A; May 14, 2012 at 02:15 PM.







. love them red seats



