from W211 into W212
Not to nitpick but the interior seems to be a lot more plasticky. Previous designs seem to use more rubber or soft plastic to simulate "fake leather" on the dash area, but now it's just plastic. Not sure if there is a "real wood" option we missed, but our wood feels like it's plastic with printed wood grains. We used to pick on Lexus for using these fake woods while Mercedes uses real wood (we know, has the long dash wood piece replaced under warranty and bill shows $1600). But I guess cost saving is now the ultimate goal for all. Kind of disappointed in this but if the car drives awesome, that's all that counts.
Last edited by steph280; Jun 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM.
It's not just the look. When I tap on certain wood pieces on the dash, it felt like hollow plastic. And when I reach under the lower edge of the pieces above glove compartment, it sure was hollow. Maybe they use wood in certain places, but not all?
Last edited by steph280; Jun 18, 2012 at 01:42 PM.
I am sure you will like your car more than anything else
I like the color you picked up , perfect choice
I find plastic areas pretty solid and good quality but I wish we had chrome/ aluminum buttons as CLS models do

Same for the door memory seats buttons lol
I picked up U09 Code which means leather covered dash, I like it a lot

Direct gear selector system is super easy to select , no need to apply too much pressure to engage from P to D . I can shift the gears with my little finger and there is no way I can do it with other shifters lol
Just tap or pull the shifter that's it
My fave feature and it goes w/o saying that you can have a vast space in favor of colomn shifter I do have black ash wood in my car , I normally prefer burl walnut over anything else but ash wood is a great trim if you have black color

.
Regards,
Don
Trending Topics
About the wood, there is NO fake wood whatsoever on the W212. All real. The reason why it appears more plastic-fake than the W211 is because it's A- Larger, and B- Because of the way they designed the ambient lighting under it, it forces the wood to "pop out" and not be flush to the dash, makes it look more plastic-y and you have that hollowness when you tap it (never bothers me 'cause I've never tapped it like that) due to the ambient lighting being recessed underneath it. A worthy trade-off IMO as the ambient lighting is beautiful.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
About the wood, there is NO fake wood whatsoever on the W212. All real. The reason why it appears more plastic-fake than the W211 is because it's A- Larger, and B- Because of the way they designed the ambient lighting under it, it forces the wood to "pop out" and not be flush to the dash, makes it look more plastic-y and you have that hollowness when you tap it (never bothers me 'cause I've never tapped it like that) due to the ambient lighting being recessed underneath it. A worthy trade-off IMO as the ambient lighting is beautiful.
Thanks for the info.
However the wood really is wood. What you are probably noticing though is how absolutely thin they cut the wood... Perhaps cost cutting or perhaps done to avoid wood splinters in an accident.
In any case when they redesign the E class I hope they make it more upscale and nicer than it is and less plasticky. Personally I would not mind a few curves in the interior as they have in the S class... I am sure some have no problem with the interior but the interior design is my biggest gripe with the current E class. I just don't like it and it has not grown on me the way the exterior has. The interior seems C-classish to me...
On the plus side, you are in a better designed vehicle every other conceivable way. The W212 feels more slid to me. The side impact crash rating of the W212 is MUCH better than the W211 and the initial model year of the W212 was not the disaster it was with the W211 and I think it is a testament to build quality. Which likely means with the improvements being made for the facelifted W212 to refine an already good design it is going to be an outstanding Mercedes product.
Congrats again and drive safely!
I always thought the exterior looked more like the last Lexus GS series, but it does look nice.
Not to nitpick but the interior seems to be a lot more plasticky. Previous designs seem to use more rubber or soft plastic to simulate "fake leather" on the dash area, but now it's just plastic. Not sure if there is a "real wood" option we missed, but our wood feels like it's plastic with printed wood grains. We used to pick on Lexus for using these fake woods while Mercedes uses real wood (we know, has the long dash wood piece replaced under warranty and bill shows $1600). But I guess cost saving is now the ultimate goal for all. Kind of disappointed in this but if the car drives awesome, that's all that counts.
IMHO, while W212 is a better built car in every respect, there are a number of small things MB compromised on:
Interior: W212's center rear consol plastic s very cheap especially in lighter interior colors, doors trim is nowhere close to W211's with leather option, dashboard plastics are much harder to touch;
Exterior: W212's lower front center grille mesh is made of cheap matte black plastic (mine already has 1.5" diameter whole right in the middle - how it happened I have no clue), W211 has gloss black metal mesh (same metal mesh as on the SL that costs double).
Certainly not a day and night differences, but I do see some costs cutting in some not very important areas.
And yes W212's first year MSRP was quite a bit lower than W211, but they do keep on raising MSRP every year since.
Correction on the above statement: MSRP of my 2009 W211 4matic with P1, Pano and Sports package was just over $58K; while MSRP of my 2010 W212 rwd Sport with P1, Pano and wheels package was right about $55K. By adding AWD 4matic option ($2.5K), MSRPs of last year's W211 and first year's W212, when comparably equipped, are basically the same. To be fair, for 2009 (W211's last model year) MB did reduce prices on options (i.e. Sport package from $5K to $1.5K) and gave free AWD option ($2.5K value). So a $5K reduction is on 2010 W212 as compared to 2008 W211, not 2009. This is not an isolated case. For example, Toyota (for a completely different reasons) reduced prices of fully loaded Supra NA by $10K and Supra TT by $16K, from 2006 model year to 2007.
On SL - there are NO compromises. This is MB's flagship car. For new car buyers in that price range, $2K one way or the other does not matter, as long as their expectations are fullfilled.
Last edited by threeMBs; Jun 21, 2012 at 12:58 PM.
I never pay that much attention to the feel of the 'wood' in my car,
and my other one is plastic anyway right?? (CF)
so at least I know that one's plastic!!

enjoy man!
IMHO, while W212 is a better built car in every respect, there are a number of small things MB compromised on:
Interior: W212's center rear consol plastic s very cheap especially in lighter interior colors, doors trim is nowhere close to W211's with leather option, dashboard plastics are much harder to touch;
Exterior: W212's lower front center grille mesh is made of cheap matte black plastic (mine already has 1.5" diameter whole right in the middle - how it happened I have no clue), W211 has gloss black metal mesh (same metal mesh as on the SL that costs double).
Certainly not a day and night differences, but I do see some costs cutting in some not very important areas.
And yes W212's first year MSRP was quite a bit lower than W211, but they do keep on raising MSRP every year since.
Correction on the above statement: MSRP of my 2009 W211 4matic with P1, Pano and Sports package was just over $58K; while MSRP of my 2010 W212 rwd Sport with P1, Pano and wheels package was right about $55K. By adding AWD 4matic option ($2.5K), MSRPs of last year's W211 and first year's W212, when comparably equipped, are basically the same. To be fair, for 2009 (W211's last model year) MB did reduce prices on options (i.e. Sport package from $5K to $1.5K) and gave free AWD option ($2.5K value). So a $5K reduction is on 2010 W212 as compared to 2008 W211, not 2009. This is not an isolated case. For example, Toyota (for a completely different reasons) reduced prices of fully loaded Supra NA by $10K and Supra TT by $16K, from 2006 model year to 2007.
On SL - there are NO compromises. This is MB's flagship car. For new car buyers in that price range, $2K one way or the other does not matter, as long as their expectations are fullfilled.
The W212's interior is much less soft and coddling in the materials dept than the W211 indeed, but of course, there's no contest in the much improved fit/finish, tactile quality, seemingly lasting quality, rigorous quality, etc. I do wish for a softer/warmer material quality in the W212, and my W211's interior always made me happy when I noticed those "little detailed materials" that most might not, that let me know that it was indeed a "Premium Car", so don't get me wrong, but I kind of "get" where M-B was going with it. No nonsense, built to last, to the point, and similar to the W126 in execution (and design).
I LOVED that rich "wool like" material on my W211's A-Pillars, SO rich and premium, but remember, M-B cost cut these areas on the facelift W211, so it started before the W212. They put rougher materials on the A-Pillars, cheaper door pins, and took the standard leather inserts out of the front seats.
Also, my pre-facelift W211 AMG Sport Package had the nice gloss-black bumper mesh, but I believe the facelift W211 got the cheap honeycomb plastic? I know that the W221 S-Class got it, so it was in M-B production lines well before the W212 (and on more expensive models).
I also believe that the R231 (new) SL uses the same matte black honeycomb plastic. I think it's a safety measure for pedestrian impacts as well.
KA, as I mentioned above, my post facelift W211 2009 E "AMG Sport Package" had the same "nice gloss-black bumper mesh" made of metal as your pre facelift one. Do not know about other models, but for E-class they changed it to a much cheaper feeling and looking plastic starting with W212. Agree on cheaper materials used on pillars. Same holds true for headliner. The Pano roof's "screen/cover" is a joke - completely useless in summer, especially when car is parked.
Do not get me wrong, I'm quite happy to overlook these cost savings on MB's part since they did produce a much better overall vehicle than W211 (W212 does drive unquestionably so much better than W211) for about the same price, but would have gladly paid a few hundred more for those before mentioned little things..
I wish they had an option package to upgrade the interior
One thing that really bothers me is the center stack. Various levels of controls on the center stack are at different depths and seem to randomly jot in and out of the center console and I see no cohesiveness in the design and implementation. This is especially noticeable if you look into the front dashboard from above through the sunroof of a W211 and compare it with a W212. The beautiful organic curves and seamless blending of surfaces of the W211 is all gone...









