Undisguised 2014 E-class
http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2012/10...z-e-class.html


I like C218 CLS but I believe these cars look nicer if they came with a proper MB grill as W212s
Meanwhile grill and bumper cover should not be integrated , whole part is plastic and looks cheap .
Quad lights are distinctive and exclusivity to E Class but I must say composite lights are better looking imo
I like quad lights though
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The current quad light ponton design is very distinctive - even more so with the 2010 hockey stick DRLs.
The current quad light ponton design is very distinctive - even more so with the 2010 hockey stick DRLs.
The quad headlamp design appears to be preserved (in spirit) by the LEDs. I thought the ponton fenders were a contrived (and not particularly effective) way to simply reduce the visual mass of the rear end, w/ the sheetmetal stamping bordering on primitive, IMHO.
I think the exterior of the E-class has been one of MB's weaker efforts (and I'm not particularly fond of the interior), and I think the new one will look markedly better inside and out, based on these photos we've seen so far....



I was wondering after looking at that post a LONG time ago.. just never brought it up
Is it just that line that runs across the car??
The Star grille looks so awkward and off on an upright Sedan like the E as well.
This is not to say that the car will look better than the pre-facelift, or that the pre-facelfit will look dated as a design being judged in itself, but M-B doing such a change makes it look like they deem the pre-facelift to be flawed and have done an "about face", therefore doing a disservice to owners of the pre-facelift, and conveying a sense of discordance and lack of foresight from within.
Most other M-B's, and BMW's, etc., have very minimal facelifts, enough changed/refined to ensure you're getting a freshened up and further perfected-product, but one that doesn't render the previous one "noticeably "previous version", and one that usually can't be distinguished from the facelift from a layman. This is what makes great facelifts.
As for myself I'm due to trade when the new model comes in and I find it a plus. Also if we get the new European V6, HP will increase to 330. All that combined with new software for e-mail reading will be the incentive to update mid cycle.
The Star grille looks so awkward and off on an upright Sedan like the E as well.
This is not to say that the car will look better than the pre-facelift, or that the pre-facelfit will look dated as a design being judged in itself, but M-B doing such a change makes it look like they deem the pre-facelift to be flawed and have done an "about face", therefore doing a disservice to owners of the pre-facelift, and conveying a sense of discordance and lack of foresight from within.
Most other M-B's, and BMW's, etc., have very minimal facelifts, enough changed/refined to ensure you're getting a freshened up and further perfected-product, but one that doesn't render the previous one "noticeably "previous version", and one that usually can't be distinguished from the facelift from a layman. This is what makes great facelifts.
I thought that design of the current E-class was pretty unremarkable to begin w/, so I welcome the changes. I rather miss the days of Bruno Sacco....
As far as minimal changes making a "great" facelift, I think the subtle changes that are usually made have been as much dictated by financial concerns (i.e., not having to make sheetmetal alterations) as by aesthetic concerns....
Last edited by alsyli; Nov 1, 2012 at 03:14 PM.



.






...but this makes me really like my E even more
: