Reliability




Good news is that the V6 E Class has returned to above average overall. V8 still below average.
MB in general ranks 14th, but that is up from 18th. Audi went from 26th to 8th-Best of Europeans. Can they hold it? Ironically VW is 18th.
The issue also reviews the 2013 Lexus GS 350 and ranks it below the E350 (diesel/luxury version?)
. is toyota still on the top
? but i'm quite surprise to see the gs ranked below the e350 on reliability simply because those magazine people always think toyota/lexus are bullet-proof
.




FYI, the Luxury Diesel version of E class ranked higher than the 2010 Sport gas version tested earlier. Apparently this was based primarily on the more comfortable ride in the Luxury versions.
Last edited by El Cid; Nov 8, 2012 at 09:46 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Pistons, valves, brakes, transmissions, in all car models, have relatively low failure rate (or they should).
High tech stuff, like lane keeping, nav, auto dim, auto suspension, etc., etc., has a relatively high failure rate.
Mercedes tend to have more high tech stuff.
Further, because Mercedes buyers pay so much money, they tend to be less patient with little problems. And because the service operations are so friendly (little crap, loaners, etc.), Mercedes owners are more likely to take the time to get things fixed.
This does not absolve Mercedes of their reliability issues --- it just puts things in a little different perspective. As for me, I am not trying to make excuses for Mercedes --- my particular $70,000 Mercedes is the second worst in 48 years of buying 14 new cars of many brands, and I am p****d. (The first worst, a Toyota Avalon, had fewer problems than the Mercedes, but it blew an engine . . . twice.)
Pistons, valves, brakes, transmissions, in all car models, have relatively low failure rate (or they should).
High tech stuff, like lane keeping, nav, auto dim, auto suspension, etc., etc., has a relatively high failure rate.
Mercedes tend to have more high tech stuff.
Further, because Mercedes buyers pay so much money, they tend to be less patient with little problems. And because the service operations are so friendly (little crap, loaners, etc.), Mercedes owners are more likely to take the time to get things fixed.
This does not absolve Mercedes of their reliability issues --- it just puts things in a little different perspective. As for me, I am not trying to make excuses for Mercedes --- my particular $70,000 Mercedes is the second worst in 48 years of buying 14 new cars of many brands, and I am p****d. (The first worst, a Toyota Avalon, had fewer problems than the Mercedes, but it blew an engine . . . twice.)
None-the-less, I have been very happy with the reliability of the Benz. The recent battery issue has me somewhat concerned because while the dealer has replaced the battery under warranty after two years, I am assuming this will have a hefty price tag once the car is out of warranty. Makes a good argument for an extended warranty.
Time will tell.




Ironically, the things that fail in MB do not fail in far lesser priced vehicles.
Also, doesn't matter if covered by warranty or not - parts/systems should not fail to start with.
The motor in my steering wheel failed at 2 years and 7,000 miles and it was replaced under warranty. However, it took 2.5 days after the part came in. What would it cost me to replace it not under warranty? Have had same feature in other cars and never failed. Have had other problems as well. Heck, look at this forum-way too many problems.
While all of us have probably had lemons, the reliability reports from organizations indicate systematic reliability issues.
BTW, time is money - at least mine is.
Sorry if this offends, but I think MB/DAG can do better and we should expect them to. How can Kia have a better warranty than MB?
Oddly enough, b/c of Honda's stellar reputation, I expected a lot from my Accord (2003, V6). It wasn't exactly horribly unreliable, but I was shocked when the head unit failed (replaced under warranty), the key fob went dead (out of warranty), the hood strut failed (huh?), the car stalled when I was switching from reverse to drive during a 3-point turn (if front of on-coming traffic), the exhaust system needed to be de-carbonized (my own fault, I suppose).
It was almost as unreliable as the most unreliable MBs our family has had; the main advantage was that it was simply cheaper to repair. Of course, repairs were a hassle since Honda service stations don't have loaner cars....




