- Mercedes Benz E Class Crash Test and Safety Ratings
Important information to help you understand your Mercedes-Benz
Usefullness of 3rd row seat in wagon
Purchased a 2013 E350 wagon last week, am wondering the usefulness of the 3rd row seat. Manual says its for 4.5ft or shorter people, which pretty much limits it to kids. However since kids are required to sit in car seats, is it legal to have a kid sit back there?
There is no room to fit a car seat in the 3rd row, so if a child does sit back there it would have to be without a car seat.
I've asked my neighbor (local sheriff) and a friend who is member of SFPD, neither of them know the answer for sure, (they've asked their coworkers as well).
It seems if this seat is only suitable for kids, but its not legal for kids to sit there, than why go to the expense and weight of adding the 3rd row seat? Would've been better off lowering the price or enlarging the storage area.
Anyone know if its legal (in any state) for a child under 8 to site in the 3rd row of the wagon without a car seat?
thanks
In any case, it is legal as per federal laws in the US (otherwise it wouldn't be offered on the vehicle).
http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/l...fety_laws.html
In this case, a child safety seat will not fit in the 3rd row. MB states 3rd row is for people 4.5ft or shorter. Child seat law says must be greater than 57" to not need child safety seat. 57" is greater than 4.5 ft, so by the time a child grows out of his/her safety seat (per CA law) they have out grown the safe size to sit in this 3rd row seat as well.
Which all goes back to my original question, how useful is this seat if 1) only people under 4.5ft tall can sit in it, 2) people under that height are most likely kids, 3) kids under 4ft 9" tall have to be in a child safety seat per CA law, 4) 4ft 9" is over 4.5ft, 5) child safety seat will not fit in the 3rd row.
So in essence, this 3rd row is completely useless. Can't sit anyone there. Why did they even bothered including it? Would've been more useful to use the space as extra storage, or lower the weight of the vehicle (the seat back and seat bottom together weigh over 100 pounds).
I can't get a firm answer from CHP, local police and sheriff office, or MBUSA.
In this case, a child safety seat will not fit in the 3rd row. MB states 3rd row is for people 4.5ft or shorter. Child seat law says must be greater than 57" to not need child safety seat. 57" is greater than 4.5 ft, so by the time a child grows out of his/her safety seat (per CA law) they have out grown the safe size to sit in this 3rd row seat as well.
Which all goes back to my original question, how useful is this seat if 1) only people under 4.5ft tall can sit in it, 2) people under that height are most likely kids, 3) kids under 4ft 9" tall have to be in a child safety seat per CA law, 4) 4ft 9" is over 4.5ft, 5) child safety seat will not fit in the 3rd row.
So in essence, this 3rd row is completely useless. Can't sit anyone there. Why did they even bothered including it? Would've been more useful to use the space as extra storage, or lower the weight of the vehicle (the seat back and seat bottom together weigh over 100 pounds).
I can't get a firm answer from CHP, local police and sheriff office, or MBUSA.
Trending Topics
I did not have time to research more as it was 5pm on April 30th and we were trying to get in on a month end deal to save some $$. Our choices were either ML350 without 3rd row, or E350 wagon with the 3rd row that may come in handy on occasion. So we went with the E350 wagon.
Since the purchase, I've checked with 6 different police departments including several California highway patrol offices, and not a single one is sure where the state law stands regarding this issue/question.
My 5 year old son's classmate has an A6 allroad and an older E320 wagon that has 3rd row and they do use it frequently, and without a car seat.
I'd rather error on the side of caution whenever it comes to the safety and well being of my kid.
Seems I won't get a clear answer, so I may just not use the seat unless absolutely necessary. (i.e. when I have to ferry around the entire 5 year old basketball team that I voluntarily coach).
Thanks
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
About safety, I totally agree, This thing is built like a tank. That's why we decided to fork over the extra $$ to get the MB E350 wagon vs another vehicle.
People can quote crash test ratings all they want, but my thought is this, crash tests are done in controlled environments (speed, angle of impact etc), real accidents are not in controlled environments, over the last 22 years, I've witnessed enough accidents to know those in german vehicles have a much higher chance of surviving an accident then those in japanese vehicles. And that's why my family buy nothing but german vehicles, even though they cost more to buy and more to maintain. Our lives are worth it.
This accident I was in two weeks ago that totaled my car (and thus need to buy this E350 wagon), had I been in anything other than my VW Passat wagon at the time, I would've been seriously injured.
We once had a new audi a4 give up its life to save the lives of my parents and grandmother. the occupants of the other two vehicles in the accident (both Japanese vehicles) were not so lucky. (two died, one permanent brain damage, while my parents and grandmother walked away with a few scratches from broken glass).




If you are looking for clarification on the law only, then I don't know. Our local Fire department was also more helpful to us than the PD so you might want to try them as someone else suggested.
Instead of trying to find out what the law says, I'm just going to buy a low or no back booster for use in the 3rd row. Although he does not need a booster to be seated at the proper height for proper seat belt fit in the 3rd row. This way if we ever get stopped, I can show the police men that the child is in a child safety seat.
MB really designed that 3rd row for small people thus the seat belt is also designed for smaller people. the seat belt in the 3rd row fits him better than the 5 point harness on the britax frontier 85 full height booster he has now.
I have two E wagons, an 04, and an 11, both with the third row. Once my kids get a bit bigger I plan on letting sit back there. Rear facing is safer and the seat is really no differet than using a booster in the second row. I think as long as the seatbelt falls in the right place you are good.
BTW - The Tesla also has a thrid row, only it's options and comes with 5-point harness. The dealer told me that it is considered a legal child seat.
So normal seats need booster thingys to ensure seatbelts work with smaller children bodies...
but if rear facing the seat belt just keeps kids from sliding side to side and keeps them in place...
everything changes if rear ended though....
plus car sickness comes into play when looking rearwards as I remember my days in the oldChevy wagon rear facing set by that big curved roll down window...
BLEHhhh thinking of make me queasy.
Food for thought: the purpose of a booster seat is to bring the child higher up so that the seatbelt properly fits and to help children sit comfortably by raising them up so they can sit up against the seatback with their knees bent over the edge of the booster or vehicle seat.
Well, the rear facing seats do all of that. Little legs bend perfectly and feet are flat on the floor, the seatbelts are designed to fit kids just as is, (and even the headrests are adjustable). Thus the need for a booster in these rear-facing seats is moot.
I think that facing backwards is actually safer. Infant car seats are installed rear-facing for that reason: A rear-facing seat provides the best protection for a child’s head, neck, and spine in a sudden stop or crash.
The one thing that I would like to know about though is what the crumple zone is like in the event of a rear collision.
edit re rear crumple zone: https://www.benzworld.org/threads/my-wagons-gone-check-out-this-hit.1278974/
Last edited by originalpie; May 6, 2022 at 12:00 AM. Reason: Link to rear-ended wagon w/photo
Food for thought: the purpose of a booster seat is to bring the child higher up so that the seatbelt properly fits and to help children sit comfortably by raising them up so they can sit up against the seatback with their knees bent over the edge of the booster or vehicle seat.
Well, the rear facing seats do all of that. Little legs bend perfectly and feet are flat on the floor, the seatbelts are designed to fit kids just as is, (and even the headrests are adjustable). Thus the need for a booster in these rear-facing seats is moot.
I think that facing backwards is actually safer. Infant car seats are installed rear-facing for that reason: A rear-facing seat provides the best protection for a child’s head, neck, and spine in a sudden stop or crash.
The one thing that I would like to know about though is what the crumple zone is like in the event of a rear collision.
edit re rear crumple zone: https://www.benzworld.org/threads/my-wagons-gone-check-out-this-hit.1278974/
similar accident




I did have W210 wagon and W211 wagon.
In W210 I had my 6-4" friend and his slightly overweigh wife sitting in the rear without complains. That was however on Las Vegas Strip cruising, so not long (although time-consuming) trip.
In W211 the ingenious engineers fit fuel tank under 2nd row seat, so spare donut wheel went under rear passengers feet. Pretty good fit, so I wonder if W212 owner can show picture how it is done in this model.
Still I prefer full size spare and turned that by removing some lining on W211 it did fit, what made me happy.
Now W212 wagon with 4-cylinder diesel engine has been my dream for long years. Especially when you see them selling in UK for $2-3,000
I am still drooling.
Last edited by kajtek1; May 7, 2022 at 04:14 PM.






