2014 e350. What'd you pay?
Having a Keyless GO , I don't get these outta my pocket but on rare occasions , I realize that //// AMG one looks very cool when I insert it in the ignition hole

I have just found an older pic of the car ,so you can literally take the pic in your eyes how it looks when it occupies ignition lock
Last edited by BenzV12; Nov 23, 2013 at 04:43 AM.
But after "further review" like an NFL game here's my deal.
I bought my E 350 in June of 2013, very early not many on the lot.
Also Cleveland only has three MB dealers, I see some cities have more dealers to compete with consequently better discounts.
If I look at my deal as an " out the door price " I did OK, not as good as some but I was fine with it.
My car's MSRP was $ 67500.00
I received a $4500.00 discount or 5%
This left $63000.00
I received an additional $4000.00 on my trade in, I say additional because I was offered 4K less by a BMW , and Audi dealer on trade that week.
So it's the old less discount more trade in value game, I'm fine with that because in Ohio you only pay sales tax on the difference in price .
So $40,000 trade in with 7.5% sales tax saved me another $3000.00
My car full MSRP price with tax would have been $72,572.00
My out the door price with tax was $60,425.00.
I must say I was happy with the deal once conceived, because I would have heck of a time getting a 6% deal on a BMW after buying many in a ten year period, and only receiving low book value on trade. With 7.5% sales tax a 6% discount doesn't really add up.
Amazing discounts on these E350 cars. No other current car in MB lineup (except maybe "old" pre-2014 S-class) gets such a discount in percentage terms.




1) It is easier to hide it from the customers.
Not everyone is as knowledgeable about car buying as the people on this group. I'd venture to say that 90%+ of the customers have no idea nor desire to seek out the best and cheapest deal there is. When the manufacturer offers back-end cash incentive to the dealers to help them move inventory the dealer won't tell it to every customer that there is $4K cash support on every new E-class. They can use their discretion to discount to some customers to make the deal but keep most of that money with other buyers. Instead of thinking those customers are fools and idiots you should thank them because they are the deals that allow the dealer to make your 16% off MSRP possible. If they sold every car at 16% off MSRP they would go out of business at a fast pace.
2) It is easier to take it away.
When GM gives $8K buyer cash on every new truck it is close to impossible to ever take that money away. But when the cash is mostly invisible to the general population it's a lot easier to reel it in and get rid of it when BMW decides to hike their price or MBUSA knows that they're in the lead.
3) It helps with the brand image. If you were offering cash incentives to buyers it would devalue the brand and MB would be like GM. Obviously MB is banking on brand image and the last thing they would want to do to it is dilute it, at least here in North America.
4) It's a form of price discrimination. It is the manufacturer's and the dealer's best interest to maximize sales volume and profit by selling every single unit at a price that the individual will bear. This is why the P1 package costs $4k, not because the SatNav costs $4k. This is why you can get a $50k E-350 or pay twice that for an E63 which is essentially the same car. Is the E63 really has twice the engineering and material cost of the E350? No! But this way they can sell the same thing at multiple price points to people who can and are willing to pay that price for a little more. It's called rate of diminishing returns in economic terms. I find in amazing that Acura was a one price for all for the longest time and did not catch on to do this. I think they royally screwed themselves with one pricing something that comes off a US manufacturing line where a-la-carte ordering would be completely possible with a reasonable ordering time frame. They finally started to see the light and realized that they need to do some sort of price discrimination otherwise they will be left behind so with the latest MDX they did that by offering packages and 2wd and awd models to cover a wider range of pricing. It's still not the breadth of the W212 line but at least it's something.
I kind of find the notion ridiculous that people who cross-shop BMW, Audi and Mercedes will make a decision based on cost alone. I can assure you that most customers who're deciding between the A6, 525 and the E350 look at a lot more differentiating factors than the bottom price. $2K on $60K is 3%. I really don't think the 3% is what makes or breaks a deal. It would certainly not be enough to make me go from one to another if I made my decision based on other factors such as looks/features/driving characteristic/image etc.
Everyone seems so caught up on the "image". I find it laughable that most of you buy a car for the image it represents. I think you all are missing out on what really matters which is just how great these cars drive and how beautiful and refined the interiors are and how advanced the technology is that went into it. Those are the reasons to buy a MB, not because it has a star on the hood.
Last edited by GregTR; Nov 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Trust me, they are still making money. There are still folks out there paying MSRP on mass produced vehicles due to lack of knowledge. Which is good for the MFR
1) It is easier to hide it from the customers.
Not everyone is as knowledgeable about car buying as the people on this group. I'd venture to say that 90%+ of the customers have no idea nor desire to seek out the best and cheapest deal there is. When the manufacturer offers back-end cash incentive to the dealers to help them move inventory the dealer won't tell it to every customer that there is $4K cash support on every new E-class. They can use their discretion to discount to some customers to make the deal but keep most of that money with other buyers. Instead of thinking those customers are fools and idiots you should thank them because they are the deals that allow the dealer to make your 16% off MSRP possible. If they sold every car at 16% off MSRP they would go out of business at a fast pace.
2) It is easier to take it away.
When GM gives $8K buyer cash on every new truck it is close to impossible to ever take that money away. But when the cash is mostly invisible to the general population it's a lot easier to reel it in and get rid of it when BMW decides to hike their price or MBUSA knows that they're in the lead.
3) It helps with the brand image. If you were offering cash incentives to buyers it would devalue the brand and MB would be like GM. Obviously MB is banking on brand image and the last thing they would want to do to it is dilute it, at least here in North America.
4) It's a form of price discrimination. It is the manufacturer's and the dealer's best interest to maximize sales volume and profit by selling every single unit at a price that the individual will bear. This is why the P1 package costs $4k, not because the SatNav costs $4k. This is why you can get a $50k E-350 or pay twice that for an E63 which is essentially the same car. Is the E63 really has twice the engineering and material cost of the E350? No! But this way they can sell the same thing at multiple price points to people who can and are willing to pay that price for a little more. It's called rate of diminishing returns in economic terms. I find in amazing that Acura was a one price for all for the longest time and did not catch on to do this. I think they royally screwed themselves with one pricing something that comes off a US manufacturing line where a-la-carte ordering would be completely possible with a reasonable ordering time frame. They finally started to see the light and realized that they need to do some sort of price discrimination otherwise they will be left behind so with the latest MDX they did that by offering packages and 2wd and awd models to cover a wider range of pricing. It's still not the breadth of the W212 line but at least it's something.
I kind of find the notion ridiculous that people who cross-shop BMW, Audi and Mercedes will make a decision based on cost alone. I can assure you that most customers who're deciding between the A6, 525 and the E350 look at a lot more differentiating factors than the bottom price. $2K on $60K is 3%. I really don't think the 3% is what makes or breaks a deal. It would certainly not be enough to make me go from one to another if I made my decision based on other factors such as looks/features/driving characteristic/image etc.
Everyone seems so caught up on the "image". I find it laughable that most of you buy a car for the image it represents. I think you all are missing out on what really matters which is just how great these cars drive and how beautiful and refined the interiors are and how advanced the technology is that went into it. Those are the reasons to buy a MB, not because it has a star on the hood.




It just depends on what you're looking for and how much you're willing to pay for it. On a wagon I think you can get $500-$750 over invoice in a competitive market, maybe even a bit less, but you will not get the discounts that people are getting on the sedan.




My Infiniti has a way better backup camera
My Honda has much better navigation
My Avalon coming with leather in stock
People are really angry to see that $60k priced car is lacking in many obvious things that $30k or even $20k may have. Is E is fastest car in the group unless we talk about E63? Even much cheaper Mustang will be faster. Does E class have best handling? BMW, Audi and many other cheaper cars will play better here. Refined interior? Only MB make $60k cars with vinyl covered seats. Big discount reflects that MB can't hold competition, so they heavily discount cars for people who still take them for Mercedes 3 points star.
My Infiniti has a way better backup camera
My Honda has much better navigation
My Avalon coming with leather in stock
People are really angry to see that $60k priced car is lacking in many obvious things that $30k or even $20k may have. Is E is fastest car in the group unless we talk about E63? Even much cheaper Mustang will be faster. Does E class have best handling? BMW, Audi and many other cheaper cars will play better here. Refined interior? Only MB make $60k cars with vinyl covered seats. Big discount reflects that MB can't hold competition, so they heavily discount cars for people who still take them for Mercedes 3 points star.
Even the 5 series and X5 now have navi as a standard feature.




My Infiniti has a way better backup camera
My Honda has much better navigation
My Avalon coming with leather in stock
People are really angry to see that $60k priced car is lacking in many obvious things that $30k or even $20k may have. Is E is fastest car in the group unless we talk about E63? Even much cheaper Mustang will be faster. Does E class have best handling? BMW, Audi and many other cheaper cars will play better here. Refined interior? Only MB make $60k cars with vinyl covered seats. Big discount reflects that MB can't hold competition, so they heavily discount cars for people who still take them for Mercedes 3 points star.
I often ask myself "WTF costs $45K+ in my E90 or the A4 Avant?" but every time I get a ride or rent a domestic or Japanese car the answer becomes self evident.
Deals on 528i and 535i just got sweeter. So customers save some money when the Germans fight against each other.
Deals on 528i and 535i just got sweeter. So customers save some money when the Germans fight against each other.
Damn it man!! Should have done that before I picked up the E!! I really wanted that 535i M Sport!!!
My Infiniti has a way better backup camera
My Honda has much better navigation
My Avalon coming with leather in stock
People are really angry to see that $60k priced car is lacking in many obvious things that $30k or even $20k may have. Is E is fastest car in the group unless we talk about E63? Even much cheaper Mustang will be faster. Does E class have best handling? BMW, Audi and many other cheaper cars will play better here. Refined interior? Only MB make $60k cars with vinyl covered seats. Big discount reflects that MB can't hold competition, so they heavily discount cars for people who still take them for Mercedes 3 points star.
Deals on 528i and 535i just got sweeter. So customers save some money when the Germans fight against each other.
Every time I'd go to BMW dealers and tell them what I was paying on my E Classes, they'd always look annoyed, as in they've heard it before. They'd remark with something about how M-B discounts their E Class so deeply it almost isn't fair as BMW won't resort to THAT kind of discount on the 5er. However, fast forward now a couple of years later, and BMW almost has no choice but to keep upping the incentives. Even then, I don't think you'll ever see 20-25% discounts on a 535i, which is almost regular fair on an E350 Sedan. I don't think you'll find too many 535i's at 10-15% even, which is considered kind of a low discount on an E350.
Of course, just to note, this is all of course based on my personal shopping experiences with both cars and what I've witnessed being on both boards.




I love it how everyone is such a marketing and economic expert on this board and knows what the auto industry obviously has no idea how to do. Gotta love the peanut gallery and armchair auto industry insiders who can't even grasp the basics of supply and demand.
15-20% is the norm if you want to get a doable good deal, based on my research and experience. I got 20% off of my 2011 E350 in the middle of 2011, without any tricks or research (I walked in and got convinced to trade in my 2010 E to drop my payments).
If it was me, considering all the deals I get sent to me from various dealers (which I have PM'd to many people), what I've seen others get, what I got before, and how I like to get a good deal, I wouldn't settle for less than 20% or more on an E350 (Sedan). And that's part of the problem, when they "give them away" like they do, it lowers the perceived value of the car to me, i.e I think "I don't think it's worth it unless I get 20+% off".

But seriously, these cars can be discounted plenty and still be profitable. These are not handmade Faberge eggs - they are efficiently made on a modern assembly line like any other mainstream car, and are made as fast and in as great of quantity as realistically possible. Costs are easily recovered, especially on platforms with a few years under them.
And maybe furthermore, the average punter concerned with "image" is only looking at MSRP and has no clue about discounts. These cars could be had with discounts 20++ years ago as well. Didn't matter then, doesn't matter now. Worry more about longterm reliability.
I love it how everyone is such a marketing and economic expert on this board and knows what the auto industry obviously has no idea how to do. Gotta love the peanut gallery and armchair auto industry insiders who can't even grasp the basics of supply and demand.
Last edited by fintail; Nov 25, 2013 at 03:08 AM.
Per dealers I've spoken to, E350 buyers always just want the "cheapest" version, the most basic package, which is why you rarely ever see even P2 Package pre-facelifts. Part of that is probably because shoppers get the taste of blood as to how cheaply W212's are attained for. I.e the "culture of buyer" has been formed to now look at an E350 in terms of how discounted it is, not how well equipped it is, etc.
When I see someone driving an E350, knowing what I do abut what they lease for, I can't help but assume the person got it more-so because it was by far the cheapest to lease out of the competition or "not much more than a loaded Economy car i.e Camry/Accord", not because it was their top choice. And that's another way such deep discounts hurt the cachet of the cars, it gives the impression that they HAVE to be discounted so deeply to entice buyers who aren't enticed about the car UNLESS it's been let go for so cheap to begin with. I had these same feelings when I was a W212 stalwart fan and had my own as well, so it's nothing developed since changing brands.




