E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2015 E400 vs. 2015 E350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2014 | 09:27 PM
  #51  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
It's a bit hard to distinguish the new benzes from each other these days
That's a good point. The C is more of a copy/paste of the S than anything BMW or Audi have done. In person, the C literally takes every S line and tries to cram it into a compact package, which imo (and others have commented similarly) yields slightly awkward results.

The CLA also takes the CLS and morphs it into a FWD proportion econobox that starts at $29K.

All the big 3 are resorting to this. Brand identity is one thing, but at this point I think that it's cost savings by all of them.

Still, to the point, imo the C400 is a more enticing package than the other MB 4 doors. It's also surprisingly large feeling, too much so for a C to me actually as it aided in a less sporty feeling to me, but might make for an easier crossover from E buyers.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 01:11 AM
  #52  
pamiboy's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 40
E 350
I doubt if current E class customers would want to switch to C class unless they really want to downsize. In all likelihood they would simply wait for the next model E class in a couple of years which would address all of the issues with this car... and some more. For an MB novice however the C class may be tempting.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 04:44 AM
  #53  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by pamiboy
I doubt if current E class customers would want to switch to C class unless they really want to downsize. In all likelihood they would simply wait for the next model E class in a couple of years which would address all of the issues with this car... and some more. For an MB novice however the C class may be tempting.
Yeah I can relate to that.

Interestingly enough, right now it's probably cheaper to get into an E Class if you're leasing. I've heard that's one factor to the C's soft reception upon launch as consumers have become so trained within the brand to get those incentives (and typically lease), especially on the W204 before it.

The C300 I drove was freakin' $50K and it didn't even have Sport Package! Gonna be a lot of infighting between it and the W212, until the W213 will probably also attempt to raise prices. Of course, it'll come down to how steadfast MB remains on those prices or if they'll have to engage in even more incentives than the previous gens.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 01:41 PM
  #54  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,232
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Originally Posted by K-A
Yeah I can relate to that.

Interestingly enough, right now it's probably cheaper to get into an E Class if you're leasing. I've heard that's one factor to the C's soft reception upon launch as consumers have become so trained within the brand to get those incentives (and typically lease), especially on the W204 before it.

The C300 I drove was freakin' $50K and it didn't even have Sport Package! Gonna be a lot of infighting between it and the W212, until the W213 will probably also attempt to raise prices. Of course, it'll come down to how steadfast MB remains on those prices or if they'll have to engage in even more incentives than the previous gens.
So k-a I had to see for myself... Went to stealership for a wash and sat in the c300 with amg rims. It's a good looking car though I'm not thrilled with the back. Seems more spacious than my g35 but not as much as the e. Materials are nice except that open pore wood plastic stuff

It's a solid looking car overall and the c400 would probably be my pick over an e400 unless I needed more space. Overall I agree with your comments
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 02:25 PM
  #55  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
So k-a I had to see for myself... Went to stealership for a wash and sat in the c300 with amg rims. It's a good looking car though I'm not thrilled with the back. Seems more spacious than my g35 but not as much as the e. Materials are nice except that open pore wood plastic stuff

It's a solid looking car overall and the c400 would probably be my pick over an e400 unless I needed more space. Overall I agree with your comments


Oh yeah, forcing that S Class back onto that more compact, supposed to be a little sportier profile just yields very odd and awkward results.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 06:52 PM
  #56  
jmatero's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
2013 E350 P1, Sport, Rear Spoiler
Have to tell you though, after sitting in the new C, the interiors of the 3-series look and feel 10 years old. They nailed the interior... looks $$$$ more than the price of the car. Can't wait to see the next E-class.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 07:13 PM
  #57  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by jmatero
Have to tell you though, after sitting in the new C, the interiors of the 3-series look and feel 10 years old. They nailed the interior... looks $$$$ more than the price of the car. Can't wait to see the next E-class.
Yeah. To be honest, I was quite unimpressed with the exterior and the drive was at best "basic" (didn't drive the C400 of course) but the interior is a knockout. The 3 interior was a POS before the new C came out. Now it's a joke. Though the 3 drives a lot more engaging and dynamic to me.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 08:27 PM
  #58  
_Bondo_'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
2005 CLK500
Originally Posted by noka
I guess the 302HP NA engine has only been around since 2012, and if replaced will not have had such a long life (as used in new vehicles). I'm not sure if that's a warning flag or not (e.g. MB would not have had long to work out many of the bugs).
AFAIK the only change in 2012 was going to Direct Injection, which yielded the 302hp. Other than that, I think it was the same engine that made 268hp since it replaced the 320 in...2005?
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

New Mercedes-AMG SUVs Arrive With NEW V8 Engine: 12 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish

 
story-4

7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 8, 2014 | 10:04 PM
  #59  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by _Bondo_
AFAIK the only change in 2012 was going to Direct Injection, which yielded the 302hp. Other than that, I think it was the same engine that made 268hp since it replaced the 320 in...2005?
It's actually a totally different engine, just same displacement. The bank angles are even different, etc.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 04:38 AM
  #60  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Someone has been reading Wikipedia.

M
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 12:03 PM
  #61  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Actually it's called spending an inordinate amount of time on car forums. I knew about the 90 vs 60 degree banks and why that's supposedly inherently smoother long before the 2012's even came out.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 04:52 PM
  #62  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Right.

M
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 05:42 PM
  #63  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by Germancar1
Right.

M
Lol. Aww. Don't let that complex creep back up because you keep realizing how vast car knowledge is out there.

Consider it something learned. You now know that both engines have different bank angles. Allowing the new 3.5 to not even require a balance shaft (60 degree angle). Does Wikipedia even mention that? Maybe you can find it and show us where?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #64  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by K-A
Lol. Aww. Don't let that complex creep back up because you keep realizing how vast car knowledge is out there.

Consider it something learned. You now know that both engines have different bank angles. Allowing the new 3.5 to not even require a balance shaft (60 degree angle). Does Wikipedia even mention that? Maybe you can find it and show us where?
Are you kidding? Your knowledge is a joke at best, we all know that. You didn't show or teach anyone anything here. Yes it does actually mention that which sounds just like you wrote it:

"The M276 engine is related to the Chrysler Pentastar V6 engine, with which it shares its basic architecture, as it was developed while Chrysler was still owned by Daimler AG. This can be seen in its 60 degree vee-angle, as opposed to the 90 degree angle of its M272 predecessor. The 60 degree vee-angle eliminates the need for a balance shaft, improving refinement while reducing mechanical complexity."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_M276_engine


Sounds like to me you wouldn't know the difference between the 2 engines if they were sitting on your coffee table. The ultimate in arm-chair quarterbacking, i.e. a big phony.


M

Last edited by Germancar1; Nov 9, 2014 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 08:17 PM
  #65  
hyperion667's Avatar
MBWorld God!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 31,279
Likes: 3,917
From: on my way
2012 CLS63
Originally Posted by K-A
Lol. Aww. Don't let that complex creep back up because you keep realizing how vast car knowledge is out there.

Consider it something learned. You now know that both engines have different bank angles. Allowing the new 3.5 to not even require a balance shaft (60 degree angle). Does Wikipedia even mention that? Maybe you can find it and show us where?
Originally Posted by Germancar1
Are you kidding? Your knowledge is a joke at best, we all know that. You didn't show or teach anyone anything here. Yes it does actually mention that which sounds just like you wrote it:

"The M276 engine is related to the Chrysler Pentastar V6 engine, with which it shares its basic architecture, as it was developed while Chrysler was still owned by Daimler AG. This can be seen in its 60 degree vee-angle, as opposed to the 90 degree angle of its M272 predecessor. The 60 degree vee-angle eliminates the need for a balance shaft, improving refinement while reducing mechanical complexity."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_M276_engine


Sounds like to me you wouldn't know the difference between the 2 engines if they were sitting on your coffee table. The ultimate in arm-chair quarterbacking, i.e. a big phony.


M






I CAN'T QUIT YOU!!!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 08:20 PM
  #66  
equetefue's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
17' C43 Sedan
You guys crack me up
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 08:25 PM
  #67  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,232
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster

This butter is goin straight to my thighs....
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 08:30 PM
  #68  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by Germancar1
Are you kidding? Your knowledge is a joke at best, we all know that. You didn't show or teach anyone anything here. Yes it does actually mention that which sounds just like you wrote it:

"The M276 engine is related to the Chrysler Pentastar V6 engine, with which it shares its basic architecture, as it was developed while Chrysler was still owned by Daimler AG. This can be seen in its 60 degree vee-angle, as opposed to the 90 degree angle of its M272 predecessor. The 60 degree vee-angle eliminates the need for a balance shaft, improving refinement while reducing mechanical complexity."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_M276_engine


Sounds like to me you wouldn't know the difference between the 2 engines if they were sitting on your coffee table. The ultimate in arm-chair quarterbacking, i.e. a big phony.


M
So you provide a linked text to something I ALREADY said and that's supposed to prove that *I* surf Wikipedia?

What did your parents do to you as a child to make your spaz out and internet attack everything people say?

A member asked if the engines are different, and I simply said that they were and provided one reason as to why, it was respectful. Who the f*** cares how I knew it? Why turn something so harmless into yet another flame fest?

I try to avoid getting personal on forums at all costs, but seriously, what's wrong with you?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 08:33 PM
  #69  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,232
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
All knowledge has to originate somewhere. K-a never said he invented the 60 degree angle engine or invented the question mark...
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 08:52 PM
  #70  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
All knowledge has to originate somewhere. K-a never said he invented the 60 degree angle engine or invented the question mark...
Exactly. I don't understand why I'm getting flack from the guy for simply telling a guy "The engines are actually different, bank angles are different, etc." which are accurate. Where did I say that I made the friggin' thing myself? Lol. Even if I did get it from Wikepedia, then it's answering a members question, which is what this place is all about.

I remember reading all the press releases on the engine when it was first coming out, M-B talked about how the 60 degree bank is a unique design in that it doesn't require a balance shaft like the typical 90 degree angles (on V6's) do (due to being inherently imbalanced). I6's and Flat 6's, if I'm not mistaken, are the only inherently balanced motors out there (might be another one I'm forgetting).
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 09:25 PM
  #71  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by K-A
So you provide a linked text to something I ALREADY said and that's supposed to prove that *I* surf Wikipedia?

What did your parents do to you as a child to make your spaz out and internet attack everything people say?

A member asked if the engines are different, and I simply said that they were and provided one reason as to why, it was respectful. Who the f*** cares how I knew it? Why turn something so harmless into yet another flame fest?

I try to avoid getting personal on forums at all costs, but seriously, what's wrong with you?

You're a fountain of misinformation so when you got something right for a change I found it suspicious that it read just like it came from Wikipedia.

M

Last edited by Germancar1; Nov 9, 2014 at 09:34 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 09:43 PM
  #72  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by Germancar1
You're a fountain of misinformation so when you got something right for a change I found it suspicious that it read just like it came from Wikipedia.

M
Bullcrap. You can't take it, so you try and fling poo. You're in the wrong, period. I've never seen you contribute once to a subject without throwing vitriol. Not once.

Here's an idea. Stop paying attention to me, as I'll be more than happy to do the same to you. People here will appreciate it.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 11:06 PM
  #73  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by K-A
Bullcrap. You can't take it, so you try and fling poo. You're in the wrong, period. I've never seen you contribute once to a subject without throwing vitriol. Not once.

Here's an idea. Stop paying attention to me, as I'll be more than happy to do the same to you. People here will appreciate it.
LOL...now that's funny. Can't take what? You being able to re-word Wikipedia? Too funny.

So says the troll in every thread talking about how Mercedes is making mistakes and never contributes anything other than brainless repetition criticism.

You don't realize how loathed you are on these boards. You're the #1 person on ignore for a reason. Now you feel good because you were able to actually contribute something from Wikipedia...hilarious.


M
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 11:19 PM
  #74  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 24
From: Earth
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
What's your obsession with Wikipedia? You literally can't take getting schooled on information. It's fascinating. Like a spoiled little kid.

You get into more arguments here than I do, and I have news for you, you're on probably as many ignore lists as I am. At least I have the excuse of being a Mercedes dissenter, you as a defender have it only falling onto your spastic personality. You've already been asked to tone down your vitriol or else you'd get reprimanded, yet here you are, making a flame fest out of falsities and something knowledgeable and innocently helpful. You don't learn.

Last edited by K-A; Nov 9, 2014 at 11:22 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2014 | 11:23 PM
  #75  
Germancar1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 291
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
I questioned if you used it, and you ask me what my obsession is with it? Hilarious. Nice dodge.

Nope, the only issue is your misinformation, that you don't like Mercedes, hell we were in the same boat when it was time to buy. Oh please man you're #1 ignored here, ask around. Every single thread you're in it is the same thing, Mercedes doesn't that, they're doing this wrong and yada yada yada. Like a broken record. On the rare occasion that you're right, I actually post that I agree.

M
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.

story-0
New Mercedes-AMG SUVs Arrive With NEW V8 Engine: 12 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's updated GLE 63 S and GLS 63 bring a new-generation V8, subtle design revisions, and familiar supercar-rivaling performance figures.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-17 12:52:51


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production

Slideshow: Mercedes has never been afraid to experiment, and some of its strangest ideas turned out to be surprisingly successful.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-10 17:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-2
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look

Sideshow: A Middle Eastern tuner has transformed the Mercedes-AMG G 63 into an open-top special, replacing nearly every exterior panel in the process.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-10 15:29:50


VIEW MORE
story-3
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish

Slideshow: Six gift ideas your AMG loving dad or grad will cherish.

By | 2026-06-03 17:26:18


VIEW MORE
story-4
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built

Slideshow: Sometimes AMG builds fast sedans. Other times, it builds twin-turbo V12 land missiles and six-wheeled off-road monsters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 17:59:58


VIEW MORE
story-5
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's new electric GT 4-Door Coupe trades combustion for software, synthetic noise, and more than 1,100 horsepower.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 20:08:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-7
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE