Not sure about the new E 350 build.
What gave me a double take however was as I was fueling up before I returned the car I noticed that the fuel door finish had an orange peel type texture to the paint. Like it had been re-shot by a bad repair shop. I can't believe that the car left the factory that way. I thought that they had laser scanners to detect flaws in the finish.
Perhaps that is why this car was a loaner. However, if I was considering a new purchase, this would not make me think new E class.
In any event, you can still order burl walnut on the facelift E though its popularity is dwindling.
My point was that I had never seen that finish before on the wood trim offered. I have seen many taxis in Germany with a metal trim in place of the wood, I don't believe offered in North America. Regardless, my comment was, "To each his own." but not to my taste. Since it is an obvious option, that would not have steered me away from a new car. The poor paint finish on the fuel door would. The finish on my fuel door is flawless. What the fuel door is made of is irrelevent. The fact that it is made out of plastic dosent assume that the paint should look *****ty on it. It is a pretty simple thing to catch before the car leaves the factory. If I can notice it at a gas station why was it not noticed by people who look for this sort of thing for a living in quality control?
This car would never have been on ANY dealers showroom floor.
Last edited by mnje350; Feb 20, 2015 at 09:38 PM.
As for the fuel door, I would bet that it was a replacement door that has been poorly refinished in a body shop and installed on the loaner car. I very much doubt that any E Class with a poorly finished fuel door would pass QC inspection @ the factory.
The finish on my car's fuel door (inside and out !!) is just as fine as the front hood.
With respect to the overall build quality of the current E Class, I would describe it as exceptionally good.
Last edited by DerekACS; Feb 20, 2015 at 09:47 PM.
As for the fuel door, I would bet that it was a replacement door that has been poorly refinished in a body shop and installed on the loaner car. I very much doubt that any E Class with a poorly finished fuel door would pass QC inspection @ the factory.
The finish on my car's fuel door is just as fine as the front hood.
With respect to the overall build quality of the current E Class, I would describe it as exceptionally good.

I bet you are right on the door finish because it was such an obvious flaw I can't imagine that it left Sindlefingen that way. Perhaps this is a poor decision on the part of the dealer. I am driving a 4 year old E 350 that I bought new and have been exceptionally happy with. However, by this time of ownership I get the new car itch. Having access to a brand spankin new car as a loaner at this stage of my ownership would be a good time to make me consider getting a new one. This car did not make me want to leave my 2010.
Perhaps the loaner was already in a car accident?
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My point was that I had never seen that finish before on the wood trim offered. I have seen many taxis in Germany with a metal trim in place of the wood, I don't believe offered in North America. Regardless, my comment was, "To each his own." but not to my taste. Since it is an obvious option, that would not have steered me away from a new car. The poor paint finish on the fuel door would. The finish on my fuel door is flawless. What the fuel door is made of is irrelevent. The fact that it is made out of plastic dosent assume that the paint should look *****ty on it. It is a pretty simple thing to catch before the car leaves the factory. If I can notice it at a gas station why was it not noticed by people who look for this sort of thing for a living in quality control?
This car would never have been on ANY dealers showroom floor.
Most of the time I get a loaner it is either an E class or a GLK. Rarely it is a C class. But, the car is always brand new.


