E350 vs. C300
I'm close to buying my first MB and I was set on the E350 but it would have to be a 2013 to fit my budget. However, the new C300s are close enough that I might be able to stretch and afford one.
I'd love to hear general reactions as to which car you'd prefer. Assume the E350 has low miles. I know a direct comparison is impossible and I know we're talking turbo vs. non-turbo, 4 vs. 6 cylinder, but l'm hoping for just gut opinions and not lectures on how this isn't a great comparison, it's apples and oranges, etc.




Sit in each one for a while, play with the features, think about how it makes you feel. Walk around each several times and analyze them.
BTW, most people (all?) on this board chose the E, so we're somewhat biased.
If you're doing mostly city driving you may appreciate the smaller size and better gas mileage of the C.
Again, thanks for indulging me everyone. This would be my first MB ever and I'm equally excited and terrified.
Trending Topics
My position was to wait a year, and then buy a low mileage one year old C300. It was based on "the numbers". Similar dimensions, similar power-to-weight ratio.
My wife's position was to buy a good used E350 now ! as in NOW!
Already, you can guess who won out.
But there actually was a consensus in our choice of the E350. I changed my tune after driving both.
Who are we? A 69-year old man with a 54 year old wife. I like sporty driving, and she is very conservative. We both have to drive on some of the country's worst roads - those of Westchester County, just north of NYC. Seriously badly maintained roads, so comfort is a concern to both of us.
Driving impressions: C300, first. It's a lighter car and quite responsive. Personally, I don't care for the sound and feel of a 4-cylinder engine anymore - turbo or not. No matter what you do to mask it, they come off as buzzy, and clattery. The road feel is harsh. Again, this applies to our horrible roads. The low profile tires give a tight, but harsh ride. The seats fit the same description. Tight fit, but hard surfaced. The cabin fittings are OK - more modern than the W212, but not luxury by a long shot. And the COMAND screen simply looks like a cheap add-on. Personally, I love the exterior style. Compared to the bland W204, the 205 has just the right curves and surfaces. This car is a real winner style-wise. (Around here, they are selling like hotcakes !)
Now, the E350. You are in another world here. Everything says luxury (for the masses) but luxury all the same. The materials are a notch or two better. The seats comfy not hard. The ride is the big difference. They are made to absorb a lot of road shocks before they can intrude on the cabin area. Perfect for our horrible rutted, potholed, uneven road surfaces. But there's a price to pay. You feel a lot less in control as you float over the road rather than navigating on it. The supple suspension has a lot of "give' in it - up to a point - and then takes over and connects you to the road. (We drove only Luxury models) Perhaps a sport might be different.
The big difference is in the engine. The power flow of the V6 is smooth and silent. Combined with the 7-speed transmission, it seems to always be about at the right rpm.
One number is crucial in the comparison - weight. The E350 is nearly 4000 lbs while the C300 comes in around 3500. That's a big difference.
The upcoming new E-class will weigh less than the current one, I hear.
Well, you already know the outcome. We bought a 2010 E350 4-matic CPO with lowish mileage (24k). Iridium Grey with ash interior. nice look.
The feel of this car is totally different from our C320 4-matic Sport that hugged the road, but gave a much more comfortable ride than the new C300,
and was much more fun to drive than my wife's new E350. After owning the C320 for six years, we changed mostly out of a desire for change. Beware that. Nothing can compare to the light blue tinted "thermal" glass of the C320 Sport !
My advise is to do as much test driving of both models before you choose. What was the right answer for us may not be for you. C-class cars are really fun to drive short and medium distances. An E class invites you to drive it cross country... Good luck
Last edited by walterk55; Jul 20, 2015 at 09:25 PM. Reason: correct syntax
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




The 2010 E350 CPO with 24k miles cost exactly 1/2 the price of the car when it was new.
Apart from an issue with wood trim fading, the car looks like new.
Depreciation on these cars is brutal in the first few years.
It's your money, but personally I find that a good used recent MB is a great deal.
The next few years of depreciation will be minimal compared to the first few years' depreciation so the cost of ownership for a good recent used one is actually quite reasonable. Your eventual resale price of a 10+ year old depends a lot on how many miles you put on, but especially how well you keep the car up - both mechanically and cosmetically.
Sit in each one for a while, play with the features, think about how it makes you feel. Walk around each several times and analyze them.
BTW, most people (all?) on this board chose the E, so we're somewhat biased.




Who are we? A 69-year old man with a 54 year old wife. I like sporty driving, and she is very conservative. We both have to drive on some of the country's worst roads - those of Westchester County, just north of NYC. Seriously badly maintained roads, so comfort is a concern to both of us.
Saw a news show that discussed the Donald J. Trump State Park (closed) and its signs on the parkway.
Who are we? A 69-year old man with a 54 year old wife. I like sporty driving, and she is very conservative. We both have to drive on some of the country's worst roads - those of Westchester County, just north of NYC. Seriously badly maintained roads, so comfort is a concern to both of us.
Saw a news show that discussed the Donald J. Trump State Park (closed) and its signs on the parkway.

On the other hand, since this car only gets driven about 6,000 miles a year, the lower gas mileage was not really an issue.




Thanks for the advise. I thought a lot about an E550. Some are available at quite reasonable prices. What put me off was the added complexity of these cars. They have a lot more electronic functions, and that means more to go wrong eventually.

On the other hand, since this car only gets driven about 6,000 miles a year, the lower gas mileage was not really an issue.
I normally drive an E-Wagon but I'm driving a C63 sedan for the summer. I love the wagon for its versatility and I dislike SUVs in general so an ML/GL is not an option for me. If it wasn't for my need for cargo space, I wouldn't drive an E-Class either. It's dated inside and out, the telematics are ancient, the ride is ok but the suspension chatters across bumps (not as bad in the wagon due to the rear air but the 5er is better mannered). We are fortunate to have the 400 engine available in the wagon in Canada and it's decent (tho the transmission is still painful).
If you only drive 6000mi/yr, take a low mileage lease on a new C-Class and don't look back. Es are going to take a big hit in value when the new car comes out next year, whereas the C is still new and residuals are excellent.
Other than the 4 vs 6 cylinder debate (which you can eliminate by going with a C400), the C is a better driving, more nimble but still compliant car. If you can swing it, a C400 with AIRMATIC and the smaller wheels (18") is really a great choice, and you can probably find a deal on one as the 400 is being discontinued in favor of the C450 Sport.
I'm close to buying my first MB and I was set on the E350 but it would have to be a 2013 to fit my budget. However, the new C300s are close enough that I might be able to stretch and afford one.
I'd love to hear general reactions as to which car you'd prefer. Assume the E350 has low miles. I know a direct comparison is impossible and I know we're talking turbo vs. non-turbo, 4 vs. 6 cylinder, but l'm hoping for just gut opinions and not lectures on how this isn't a great comparison, it's apples and oranges, etc.




Also, the 550's have air suspension. I'm sure a lot of people like them and have no problems, but I was advised to steer clear of air suspension when I was looking.
What is the main advantage to the 550? A V8 with more power. Do you need it?
if you're single and don't have kids then save yourself the money and get the c. as a family car with kids + kid chairs/etc. c is pretty useless and has no space, i doubt you could fit 4 adults into a c comfortable, unless they're 5'5" or smaller.
we needed a family car and e is a family car (although i still think it could be a little bigger), otherwise c should be fine.
My position was to wait a year, and then buy a low mileage one year old C300. It was based on "the numbers". Similar dimensions, similar power-to-weight ratio.
My wife's position was to buy a good used E350 now ! as in NOW!
Already, you can guess who won out.
But there actually was a consensus in our choice of the E350. I changed my tune after driving both.
Who are we? A 69-year old man with a 54 year old wife. I like sporty driving, and she is very conservative. We both have to drive on some of the country's worst roads - those of Westchester County, just north of NYC. Seriously badly maintained roads, so comfort is a concern to both of us.
Driving impressions: C300, first. It's a lighter car and quite responsive. Personally, I don't care for the sound and feel of a 4-cylinder engine anymore - turbo or not. No matter what you do to mask it, they come off as buzzy, and clattery. The road feel is harsh. Again, this applies to our horrible roads. The low profile tires give a tight, but harsh ride. The seats fit the same description. Tight fit, but hard surfaced. The cabin fittings are OK - more modern than the W212, but not luxury by a long shot. And the COMAND screen simply looks like a cheap add-on. Personally, I love the exterior style. Compared to the bland W204, the 205 has just the right curves and surfaces. This car is a real winner style-wise. (Around here, they are selling like hotcakes !)
Now, the E350. You are in another world here. Everything says luxury (for the masses) but luxury all the same. The materials are a notch or two better. The seats comfy not hard. The ride is the big difference. They are made to absorb a lot of road shocks before they can intrude on the cabin area. Perfect for our horrible rutted, potholed, uneven road surfaces. But there's a price to pay. You feel a lot less in control as you float over the road rather than navigating on it. The supple suspension has a lot of "give' in it - up to a point - and then takes over and connects you to the road. (We drove only Luxury models) Perhaps a sport might be different.
The big difference is in the engine. The power flow of the V6 is smooth and silent. Combined with the 7-speed transmission, it seems to always be about at the right rpm.
One number is crucial in the comparison - weight. The E350 is nearly 4000 lbs while the C300 comes in around 3500. That's a big difference.
The upcoming new E-class will weigh less than the current one, I hear.
Well, you already know the outcome. We bought a 2010 E350 4-matic CPO with lowish mileage (24k). Iridium Grey with ash interior. nice look.
The feel of this car is totally different from our C320 4-matic Sport that hugged the road, but gave a much more comfortable ride than the new C300,
and was much more fun to drive than my wife's new E350. After owning the C320 for six years, we changed mostly out of a desire for change. Beware that. Nothing can compare to the light blue tinted "thermal" glass of the C320 Sport !
My advise is to do as much test driving of both models before you choose. What was the right answer for us may not be for you. C-class cars are really fun to drive short and medium distances. An E class invites you to drive it cross country... Good luck

Now when I was purchasing this E550 there was a brand new C300 for the same money. I thought about it, but it lacked a lot of the options I wanted.
Fast forward to two weeks ago I took the E in for new headlights and got a C300 loaner. Thought it was nice for about 10 minutes, then the quality of the wood starting bothering me (my wife ridiculed it as soon as she got in the car). Then I noted how un-padded the door arm rest was - I mean there was less than 2mm of cusioning before you felt the plastic under the vinyl - on my E you can press really deep before it hits plastic - and I'm pretty sure that surface is vinyl in my car too (even thought I have leather). This was true of several contact surfaces. I didn't like/learn how the touchpad in the middle works and preferred my car's command system (I have nav and voice controls which the C I drove lacked). The turbo 4 was peppy and made some very sporty noises (engine/exhaust burbles when flogged in Sport mode all around,) of course my E wouldn't haven broken a sweat keeping up (and makes some nice v8 and turbo noises depnding on how you drive it).
I'd recommend an E over C sedan. The 2012+ have newer direct injection engines, but any W212 would get my vote.




BTW, no MB is going to ride "soft." No German car does.
On a side note, what percentage of test drives has everyone been able to take on their own? Me? 25% if that. Can you ask to go alone? ha



