E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550

E550 or GLA45

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-29-2018, 05:50 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
oiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E550 or GLA45

Upgrading my C300 and stuck between choosing between a 2014 E550 and a 2016 GLA45. Im on the fence with this one. Any suggestions....
Old 05-29-2018, 06:03 PM
  #2  
Member
 
drdantheman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
2014 e250 bluetec
Absolutely E550, especially the facelifted 2014 model year, but of course I’m biased to anything w212. The GLA just looks odd, proportion wise.
The following users liked this post:
pierrejoliat (10-25-2021)
Old 05-29-2018, 06:30 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
KEY08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,922
Received 1,620 Likes on 1,189 Posts
2014 E550-sold 😩
Wow, completely different rides. My experience with the 2014 E550 4M is nothing short of amazing. Can’t comment on the GLA.
The following users liked this post:
pierrejoliat (10-25-2021)
Old 05-29-2018, 06:32 PM
  #4  
MBWorld God!

 
hyperion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,651
Received 3,399 Likes on 2,844 Posts
2012 CLS63
Eclass has proven itself, I don't think the gla has yet
Old 05-29-2018, 06:40 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kajtek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,092
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
I was thinking about GLA since occasionally I drive on desert and sedans on gravel roads are no the best, but several factors like additional cost of driving and less comfort prevails so far.
So unless I run into extraordinary deal, I stay with sedan.
Lot of people have false impression that SUV are safer vehicles.
They are in frontal collision with Fiat 500 or in case of roll-over, but we did have ML and my wife was brutally rear-ended in it.
The truck being strike first in 5-cars pile up look impressive as it could drive home, but stiff frame transferred the impact to my wife spine leaving permanent damage.
I favorite couple of topics in W210 section, where owners have been rear-ended similar way.
W210 wagon with its crumple zones look very poor after accident, but driver walked away unharmed.

The following users liked this post:
pierrejoliat (10-25-2021)
Old 05-29-2018, 09:31 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
dn325ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 60
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
None currently
Originally Posted by oiboy
Upgrading my C300 and stuck between choosing between a 2014 E550 and a 2016 GLA45. Im on the fence with this one. Any suggestions....
You haven't said what you value, so it's difficult for anyone to advise you about how these two stack up on the issues you care about. But I'm wondering if you've driven both of them? They are so different, I'm surprised anyone would be torn between these two.
Old 05-29-2018, 10:39 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cetialpha5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 6,126
Received 1,488 Likes on 1,163 Posts
2008 E350 4Matic, 2011 E350 4matic
Yeah, the GLA45 is the lower level car, but it's newer. The E550 is a higher level luxury trim, there's things like dynamic headlights, auto high beams, cooled seats, rear entertainment package, dynamic seats etc that you won't find on the GLA. But some of those options are hard to find even an E550. Basically do you want a turbo 4 cylinder or a turbo V8.

Trending Topics

Old 05-29-2018, 11:58 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
Johnny Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zion
Posts: 748
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
W212 E550 4M P2
Originally Posted by oiboy
Upgrading my C300 and stuck between choosing between a 2014 E550 and a 2016 GLA45. Im on the fence with this one. Any suggestions....
Interesting dilemma. Probably can't go wrong with either, but check out Consumer Reports.

Do you like the idea of keeping with a sedan or is it time for a change? The world wants SUV's and cross-over's these days - and I get it. You wouldn't be alone.

Do you want more room than your C? Keep in mind you can get an E with a split-folding rear seat. Maybe your C has the same? I wouldn't get one without it. However, the GLA may not be much bigger than the E aside from the rear cargo area though that may be a push. As an aside from only a few years ago, the BMW X5 had less interior room than a 5-series wagon.

Not sure, but suspect the GLA45 is harder-edged than the E550 which is a soft cruiser in my experience. Also suspect your C and the E will be closer in driving comfort and sporting capability versus the AMG-lite GLA45.

Me? I'm a sedan buyer, which is just about a dinosaur these days. I'm apparently a crumedgeon. However, I've got both a sedan and SUV in my garage. I arguably therefore have the best of both worlds and you should therefore take my preference for a sedan with a grain of salt (because I can drive the SUV when I need to).

Originally Posted by cetialpha5
Yeah, the GLA45 is the lower level car, but it's newer...
I think cetialpha5's comment about newer versus older is spot-on. In other words, some of us believe that MB builds its S to a higher quality than its E which is built to a higher quality that its C and so on. Think the C is nice? Check out the E. Think the E is nice? Check out the S!

Originally Posted by cetialpha5
Basically do you want a turbo 4 cylinder or a turbo V8.
However, I really don't think it matters how the power is technically developed - be it a turbo 4 or turbo 8, as both hit 60 in essentially the same low 4sec window. While the GLA's output is lower, it's offset by a lower curb weight (and likely a smarter tranny that can launch) so they're identically quick. The future is smaller displacement powerplants and it's turning the adage "there is no replacement for displacement" on its head.
Old 05-30-2018, 02:35 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kajtek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,092
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,384 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Originally Posted by Johnny Rad
The future is smaller displacement powerplants and it's turning the adage "there is no replacement for displacement" on its head.
Not so fast.
Recently I drive 2.1l diesel and 3l diesel.
By the book they have similar HP > 195 v/s 210 and when biturbo on small engine really makes the wonder, the 3l still kicks at lower rpm.
Than I used to have 250HP in Ford 7.3l .... could pull the house on idle....
,,, or do donuts having 1000 rpm
Old 05-30-2018, 06:10 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thefisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 3,106
Received 386 Likes on 315 Posts
2011 E550 P2 4M Sedan
E550 FTW. I would love to see what they'd say in the GLA forum. Seriously, they are so different you should just drive and get the one that best meets your needs. GLA does have some quality issues from what I've read.
The following users liked this post:
hyperion667 (05-30-2018)
Old 05-31-2018, 01:42 AM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
oiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input. Our dilemma is we often go camping and access is gravel and rough so the added clearance would help. On more than a few occasions I have scraped the bottom of my car, lucky not to damage it. We do want a larger vehicle as the c300 lacks space. Test drove both and prefer the E550. The ride on the CLA45 feels wierd to me. Perhaps it's the difference between a sedan and a crossover.
Old 05-31-2018, 02:37 AM
  #12  
Super Member
 
LemonSqueezy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 46 Posts
14 550 sedan
Isn't the gla the #1 least satisfying vehicle to drive in 2017 per consumer reports?

The E vs GLA are just in completely different class of vehicles to be compared in.
Old 05-31-2018, 08:50 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,493
Received 420 Likes on 346 Posts
MB’s
Skip the GLA or CLA stuff. Go get a big engined E550 and I promise you will be happy you did.
Old 05-31-2018, 08:51 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,493
Received 420 Likes on 346 Posts
MB’s
Originally Posted by oiboy
Thanks for the input. Our dilemma is we often go camping and access is gravel and rough so the added clearance would help. On more than a few occasions I have scraped the bottom of my car, lucky not to damage it. We do want a larger vehicle as the c300 lacks space. Test drove both and prefer the E550. The ride on the CLA45 feels wierd to me. Perhaps it's the difference between a sedan and a crossover.
If you need a suv get a 2015 ML350. I bought one for my wife and it is awesome! Solid suv with not airmatic or anything fancy. Just a basic engine, tranny and suspension set up.
The following users liked this post:
raja777m (05-31-2018)
Old 05-31-2018, 10:48 AM
  #15  
Super Member
 
Johnny Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zion
Posts: 748
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
W212 E550 4M P2
Originally Posted by kajtek1
Not so fast.
Recently I drive 2.1l diesel and 3l diesel.
By the book they have similar HP > 195 v/s 210 and when biturbo on small engine really makes the wonder, the 3l still kicks at lower rpm.
Than I used to have 250HP in Ford 7.3l .... could pull the house on idle....
,,, or do donuts having 1000 rpm
What's the torque rating of each? Suspect the 3L out torques the 2L. Of course, the big 7.3L (~445ci) is a torque monster!

Puffing significantly more air into smaller displacement motors is generating unreal hp and tq outputs.
Old 06-01-2018, 06:05 AM
  #16  
Member
 
drdantheman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
2014 e250 bluetec
Originally Posted by Johnny Rad
What's the torque rating of each? Suspect the 3L out torques the 2L. Of course, the big 7.3L (~445ci) is a torque monster!

Puffing significantly more air into smaller displacement motors is generating unreal hp and tq outputs.
My 2.1L turbo diesel has about 370 lb-ft while the 3.0L turbo diesel has 400 lb-ft. It's pretty close, and you also have to consider the 3.0 weighs quite a bit more than the 2.1.
Old 10-23-2021, 03:07 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Columbus430's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 33
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
GL450
I have a 2013 GL450 and it also has it. The fluid is not blue like radiator fluid, looks like a light oil color. It is low though, is it safe to top off with radiator fluid?
Old 10-24-2021, 09:44 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Left Coast Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: 122W, 37N
Posts: 2,124
Received 1,282 Likes on 878 Posts
2016 E350 4Matic wagon, 2019 Ford Expedition 4x4
Originally Posted by oiboy
Thanks for the input. Our dilemma is we often go camping and access is gravel and rough so the added clearance would help. On more than a few occasions I have scraped the bottom of my car, lucky not to damage it. We do want a larger vehicle as the c300 lacks space. Test drove both and prefer the E550. The ride on the CLA45 feels wierd to me. Perhaps it's the difference between a sedan and a crossover.
I'd get a Toyota 4Runner if thats your criteria. Find one with the TRD Offroad package as that adds some useful options like a pushbutton rear axle locker that can get you out of some seriously stuck places. I preferred the 4.0L V6 to the later 3.5L V6 but I don't know what they are putting in the new ones.

I've not been at all impressed with the GL series, we drove a GLC and GLE and strongly disliked both for various reasons. the GLA is FWD centric, isn't it?
Old 02-25-2024, 09:38 PM
  #19  
Newbie
 
Bigmizike67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Raleigh,NC
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 C300 Sport
E550

Easy peasy, E class is a beast! I own 2013 convertible! Love it!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E550 or GLA45



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.