2012 e550 with oil in wiring harness
And, the dealer did the 80K service and failed to notice a problem?




https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/mer...inz-0169975045
Looks like a fairly simple task to remove and replace the o-ring seals. If I experience any further idle issues or codes I may replace the entire magnets part 276-156-07-90 which include the o-rings, or possibly investigate the O2 sensor(s) which send a code. This basically answers my original question here regarding preventative maintenance for this issue. Note, I'm at 98,xxx miles now.
I have obtained a sizable concession from the dealer to solve my problem in an un-compromised fashion. It's not quite the same level as outlined in the bulletin, but for me, it's close enough for horseshoes. Apparently, my argument with them, MB USA, and my service history carried some weight....
They are going to replace ALL the affected components: wiring harness, O2 sensors, ECU, and Camshaft sensors, and install new preventative pigtails, for a price at just over half of the original work order estimate. I know it's probably overkill, but given they've dried the harness once and problems persist and so I think the right course of action is a full re-boot. I've had nothing but great service from them and I trust their recommendation and respect their concession.
Besides, there is another dude with a CLS 550 from the similar born on date who took his to an independent mechanic who did the drain the harness procedure and pigtail install on the cheap... but now that guy (Rolondro) is experiencing a phantom turbo error message that so far has been impossible to pinpoint. I'm wondering if its possible its a poor signal from a half baked repair.... This uncertainty supports my decision to go with the dealer recommendation for full replacement. On the other hand, he could have bad turbos or cats.
Anyway... its all impossible to say for certain what is the best course of action. Bottom line is 1) I LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE the TT V8 power of the E550, LOVE LOVE LOVE the e550 form factor, I love that my car massages my back as I drive, and I love getting progressively more bolstered as I pull more Gs in a turn. The car is un-compromised, and I'm happy to pay for un-compromised service to keep it in tip top shape. I'm going to roll the dice and continue on my original plan to drive it into the ground. Call me stupid in love. But whatever.
Still open to recommendations on whether I should replace the turbos while the engine is out. Car is at 96k miles. Also wondering what I should expect to pay for a swap of like for like for the turbos. It doesn't make sense that I should pay full price for turbos when given the value of remanufacturing my good ones. One the other hand, there is also something to be said for keeping TT's that have been flawless for 96k miles.... knock on wood.
One last comment before I sign off (and I'll report back one the final results)... after scouring the posts on this forum, most people here don't seem to keep their cars long enough to have a realistic opinion on actual reliability and maintenance costs. It's impossible to find for example reliable data on turbo longevity. Also, "reliability" threads seem to be packed with people boasting of things like "20k trouble free miles", or "I bought my car with 30k miles on it and am at 70k now and its as reliable as my old Honda..." What a joke. I guess what I'm starting to think is that most people wouldn't dream of owning a car like this out of warranty for the reasons I describe here. But what I hope (and believe) is that this car, properly maintained, will drive like a MB car drives, for as long as you properly maintain it. In other words, it's not a disposable box of metal, but rather a tank designed to provide decades of un-compromised experience with proper care and feeding. So if you have every five years a sizable $6k to $8k maintenance bill, you still are net neutral driving your beast of a car that is as satisfying as the first time you stepped on the twin turbo while getting your back rubbed and sides bolstered. You either pay to maintain your car in top shape, or you pay to replace a lesser box of metal every 8 years and incur the wrath of depreciation.
Two competing philosophies (I hope). For now, I'm going to roll the dice with the MB.
OP, thanks for your well-written and thoughtful follow up. I completely agree finding long-run data on reliability is very difficult because forums are not a representative sample and filled with errant posts of little use.
I wish you luck and agree with the prospect of keeping your car well-maintained. I would have the turbos rebuilt rather than replacing them. They should be serviceable items at a competent turbo rebuilder. Gives one some extra piece of mind when going through such an ordeal.
Cheers
We have a 2013 E550 Sedan and took it to the Dealer for an oil change and to check on a TSB for the Timing Chain Tensioners. Car has Only 36K miles on it and was bought through CarMax (and thankfully we bought the MaxCare warranty). SA calls me last night and says warranty Co approved Tensioner job. BUT, same oil leak that you all are discussing he tells me is happening to our car (no CEL yet). They've turned the claim in to MaxCare since the estimate to repair has gone north of $10,000, and they aren't done diagnosing. MaxCare is sending an inspector out before they will authorize repair. Don't see why they wouldn't as their warranty is more comprehensive than CPO's. However SA said if they don't cover it he'll try to get the Dealership and/or Mercedes to "help"... Are you kidding me???! I'm out of town and told the Wife that when the warranty is up the car goes.... And we absolutely Love this car
, but we'd likely also Love an E63... 
On Edit: this problem crosses a number of engines, yes including the M157 - so I guess our E63 will be a 4 liter (and I better check that out too!)
Last edited by diesel_dan; Dec 19, 2019 at 05:15 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I'm attaching a picture for clarification of the cam sensors and cam adjuster magnets on the M278 for clarification. I believe the older engines have the cam sensors on the front, but M278 has them at the top front of each cam. Other side is similar to this picture.
My 2012 E550 has just now been diagnosed with the exact same problem (all the way through to the O2 sensors) and I am on pins and needles about what the dealership/MB will do to address this well known problem since they seem to have not insisted dealers look for this issue when inspecting the car for periphery issues - such as the O2 sensor I just had replaced in September. If you have any advice on how to get the most coverage for a problem that MB clearly knows about, I would appreciate your input. I am hoping that RBM and MB will do the right thing on a CPO car with 35K miles on it.
To anyone who says they are having this issue on M278 engines, can you confirm that there is oil leaking from any of the cam sensors or magnets as in my picture above? Or what is the source of the oil leak?
1) What could I, as a diligent consumer of an MB luxury car with under 36K miles, have done differently given NO visible signs of oil leakage?
2) How quickly does the oil pass through a wiring harness that should be impervious to liquids? (Obvious answer: under 3 mo./3K miles???)
3) What is MB doing to proactively address this issue given the potential damage/costs of rapidly spreading oil?
4) Why is MB not proactively replacing magnets or informing consumers of the issue and at least giving them the choice?
I believe these to be fair questions of a company that invests millions in commercials every 10 minutes during sports events, to garner customer experience.
MB Customer Advocacy has offered me a good will 15% off parts/service (or oh yeah, a great deal on a new car lease). MB -way to go all out to assist with a problem that has been so widely recognized by owners. I feel a bit like a patron that gets food poisoning from a restaurant and being offered a free meal next time.
Most MB repair shops are telling consumers to hold shop invoices in case/until a Class Action Suit forces a proper resolution from MB. Really wondering why it has to come to this and why MB is not more diligent in taking care of consumers that bought their product???
Oh, and the E63 we had shipped in to our local CarMax was an absolute disaster!
Maybe somebody's trying to tell us something...? Back on the harness leak at the cam sensor magnets: BIL has a '13 E63 and took it by his MB indy -- the guy said they check for that leak every time one of these cars comes in and they have cleaned up harnesses with zero returns (guessing they are catching them early). Said that the jumpers are not the fix for the problem, but I don't recall if BIL said the tech said it's the magnets...
On edit: meant to conclude that obviously this is a well known problem...
Last edited by diesel_dan; Jan 11, 2020 at 03:26 PM.
And we're going to take our chances and just keep the car when warranty runs out... Our first MB and we absolutely LOVE the car! I think the M278 should be more reliable than an M157 over the long haul as well...
Last edited by diesel_dan; May 6, 2020 at 09:28 PM.
Last edited by mbvolvo92; May 8, 2020 at 09:46 PM.
No. I’m saying I have an m278 engine which was derived from the m273, and assembled with camshaft solenoids from a batch of solenoids shared between the m273 and m278 during the production transition. It is rumored btw that that those batches didn’t fully flush out until May of 2012.
Im also saying the core wiring connect on the m278 harness or the entire harness itself is either the same or not significantly different from the m273 harness. It’s certainly not designed to prevent downstream propagation oil leaks from leaky solenoids.
Does that make sense?






