To buy or not to buy
My driving is 95% highway. Typically 60mi each way, once every 5 or 6 days to get groceries and booze. Sometimes 120mi each way if i want to hit the nearest costco. Maybe 10mi/day local mileage





Perhaps the most indelible (positive) memory i have is of being picked up hitch-hiking by a 190D about 45yrs ago. LOL. That thing just hummed and floated along at ultra low revs. SMOOOOOOTH.
Last edited by pierrejoliat; Dec 24, 2020 at 12:13 PM.

Perhaps the most indelible (positive) memory i have is of being picked up hitch-hiking by a 190D about 45yrs ago. LOL. That thing just hummed and floated along at ultra low revs. SMOOOOOOTH.
What I'm saying is that Mercedes has its thing. They do what they do well, and they're good. But I have been able to enjoy many other cars, some much cheaper.




What I'm saying is that Mercedes has its thing. They do what they do well, and they're good. But I have been able to enjoy many other cars, some much cheaper.






Perhaps the most indelible (positive) memory i have is of being picked up hitch-hiking by a 190D about 45yrs ago. LOL. That thing just hummed and floated along at ultra low revs. SMOOOOOOTH.
As pierrejoliat noted, if you can't tell the difference riding in a Benz vs a Toyota, then you may be better off with the Toyota. I've owned two Nissans, one Toyota and two Hondas in the past, and they were fine, reliable vehicles. In my case, though, driving my wife's Hyundai Sonata or my Honda SUV (son's car now) always reminds me how much better the E350 is. The ride is much more sophisticated and smooth, even with the E350 Sport suspension.
Last edited by DFWdude; Dec 24, 2020 at 12:44 PM.
Then he drives my car and is like "it just glides!"
Here on Campobello Island I am about 100 miles from either the Bangor or Saint John Mercedes dealer so that is not so much of a concern
(maybe dumb) question: is there a way to determine the state of the DEF tank prior to purchase?
I liked my '89 190e 2.6 5 spd manual much better than the W211 or the current W212 that I now have. It was much more of a true Benz that either of the more recent cars.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




My youngest daughter's first car...
Last edited by pierrejoliat; Dec 25, 2020 at 08:11 PM.




I really like my 2010 E350, but a lot of warranty work was performed during the seven years it was covered. Only has 40,000 miles on it so keeping it for a while. My wife has a 2014 Nissan Rogue with same mileage and it has been perfect. Rides better and quieter than my Luxury E350. Also better gas mileage and lower insurance. Insurance is based on cost to repair vehicles by brand and M-B costs more because repair places charge more to repair them. Not to mention exorbitant cost of parts. Labor costs on M-B are higher because they take longer to do them.
Example: I have the Nissan and a 2011 Toyota Tacoma pick-up. Will cost $250 at dealership for A service on the Benz and take two hours (no loaners), whereas it takes 45 minutes or so on the Toyota and the Nissan and cost about $100 to $150 for same service.
The other problem is that I live within 20 minutes of a large city with all dealerships except the foreign luxury brands. The M-B dealer is a 45 minute drive one way. So, it becomes a 3.5 hour trip for A service, which is the least & quickest they do.
They also replace parts a whole lot more often.
Now, the old hands will jump on me for degrading M-B, but you asked. I really like the way my car looks and the overall ride so I keep it.
I really like my 2010 E350, but a lot of warranty work was performed during the seven years it was covered. Only has 40,000 miles on it so keeping it for a while. My wife has a 2014 Nissan Rogue with same mileage and it has been perfect. Rides better and quieter than my Luxury E350. Also better gas mileage and lower insurance. Insurance is based on cost to repair vehicles by brand and M-B costs more because repair places charge more to repair them. Not to mention exorbitant cost of parts. Labor costs on M-B are higher because they take longer to do them.
Example: I have the Nissan and a 2011 Toyota Tacoma pick-up. Will cost $250 at dealership for A service on the Benz and take two hours (no loaners), whereas it takes 45 minutes or so on the Toyota and the Nissan and cost about $100 to $150 for same service.
The other problem is that I live within 20 minutes of a large city with all dealerships except the foreign luxury brands. The M-B dealer is a 45 minute drive one way. So, it becomes a 3.5 hour trip for A service, which is the least & quickest they do.
They also replace parts a whole lot more often.
Now, the old hands will jump on me for degrading M-B, but you asked. I really like the way my car looks and the overall ride so I keep it.
I mean, the maintenance stuff.. the basic stuff.. can be handled by independents for much cheaper.
Otherwise the only thing I really take issue with here is the 2014 Rogue comment. I've owned a Rogue and had a few as rentals, and none of them rode better than my E350 and they were not quieter either. That's an odd observation. The Rogue is a great vehicle for sure, but it's weird that you would have that experience.




Otherwise the only thing I really take issue with here is the 2014 Rogue comment. I've owned a Rogue and had a few as rentals, and none of them rode better than my E350 and they were not quieter either. That's an odd observation. The Rogue is a great vehicle for sure, but it's weird that you would have that experience.
Ride comfort and quietness are top of my list for vehicles. That's why I got the Luxury version of the E350. The Rogue just rides better and is quieter. Don't know why, but it is. One reason why I got it was because it was rated better than comparable small SUV's.
Ride comfort and quietness are top of my list for vehicles. That's why I got the Luxury version of the E350. The Rogue just rides better and is quieter. Don't know why, but it is. One reason why I got it was because it was rated better than comparable small SUV's.




Actually, if I got rid of the E350 I would probably get a Rogue Sport, which is a smaller version but supposedly rides well and is comfortable. Easier to get in and out of SUV's than sedans these days. But, don't want to yet as I really like the Benz and think the 2010 version is the best looking vehicle M-B has made, inside and out.

Ride comfort and quietness are top of my list for vehicles. That's why I got the Luxury version of the E350. The Rogue just rides better and is quieter. Don't know why, but it is. One reason why I got it was because it was rated better than comparable small SUV's.








Not the tires nor the TP. I purchase tires rated for comfort and quite rides.
We are way off topic.
Not the tires nor the TP. I purchase tires rated for comfort and quite rides.
I can relate to this experience. What I would say is that the car is not a bad highway car if you are on smooth roads. I live near I75 which largely an asphalt road that gets pounded by a ton of truck traffic and the driving quality on that road is poor due to the busyness of the transmitted vibration through the chassis including the steering wheel. The overall experience is never harsh mind you but poor at filtering out small road imperfections. Like you I have good quality Michelin all season touring tires. Thinking something might be wrong with the suspension I asked the dealer to give it a good look over and test drive when I recently had it aligned. Their response was that the car reflected exceptional care and upkeep. For sure the car is not as quiet as my W211 was on noisy pavement. Again it's a nice road car on the right roads. My feeling is that Mercedes got on the sport sedan mentality and aren't that great at it.
In terms of ownership costs it has cost me about $15k in depreciation ($9k) and repairs ($6k due to 4 matic system repairs) over the 4.5 years and 45K miles that I have owned it and I bought it for wholesale. Buying a W212 now would be better from a depreciation standpoint because the W213 came out after I bought mine and all the W212's took a hit for that.
We also have a 2006 Mazda 3 which is a total rust bucket and approaching 200K miles but I trust the reliability of that car ten times more than my 135k 2010 Mercedes. For one thing there is just less junk to break and anything that does go won't be terrifyingly expensive to get repaired. If I keep this car until it has 200k miles on it without any additional significant repairs I will revise my opinion but based on the last 45K I just don't have much confidence in that happening. Putting crash worthiness aside, for the money the Mazda is a better car.
Of course from a safety comparison there absolutely is no comparison which is worth a lot. This is where I would trust this car over anything short of an S Class.
If one were to buy one I would go for the facelifted version despite not being a big fan of the post facelift styling for the better engine and with the hope of reliability and driving quality improvements vs my 2010.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Dec 29, 2020 at 04:43 PM.







