Picked it up this evening ...




If you look through the past posts about concerns over passing, it is not from people who have driven the E300. Rather, it is the anticipation of a problem because the motor is a turbo 4. So far those who have them are not complaining.
Not that I have a long history with the new E300, but I had one for 4 days and 175 miles of seat time and the power was just fine.
There won't be many complaints from owners because the folks who need the extra power are not buying the E300. The E300 is a nice in-town car or for touring interstate highways.
However, after driving my car for two weeks, I am deciding my concerns were overblown. Yes, it is great for around town and the interstate... but that's where I do 90 percent of my driving. Coming home Saturday night on the nice section of expressway at 75, I hit it and was doing 90 within 2 seconds... not quite as fast as the CLS, but very acceptable. And the luxury and features of my E300 are superior to the CLS and comparable to the S550.
Bottom line, my car is beautiful and I really love both the exterior and interior ... and the driving experience is better than my CLS. Very positive steering, quiet, ample acceleration... and loads of tech stuff that even a 62-year-old has been able to figure out. If you've driven any recent Mercedes, then you will quickly grasp the logic.
While I have continued to engage in post-purchase evaluation, I have not experienced any cognitive dissonance... no buyers remorse here!
Last edited by Drgolf131; Nov 22, 2016 at 01:42 AM.
However, after driving my car for two weeks, I am deciding my concerns were overblown. Yes, it is great for around town and the interstate... but that's where I do 90 percent of my driving. Coming home Saturday night on the nice section of expressway at 75, I hit it and was doing 90 within 2 seconds... not quite as fast as the CLS, but very acceptable. And the luxury and features of my E300 are superior to the CLS and comparable to the S550.
Bottom line, my car is beautiful and I really love both the exterior and interior ... and the driving experience is better than my CLS. Very positive steering, quiet, ample acceleration... and loads of tech stuff that even a 62-year-old has been able to figure out. If you've driven any recent Mercedes, then you will quickly grasp the logic.
While I have continued to engage in post-purchase evaluation, I have not experienced any cognitive dissonance... no buyers remorse here!
. My car should be delivered in later December. I would appreciate any updates on your car. Thanks
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Personally, I would never trade my '14 CLS550 for '17 E300, and to say that E300's "luxury features" are "comparable" to S550 is IMHO ridiculous (the price difference alone speaks volume - two E300s for one S550).
Personally, I would never trade my '14 CLS550 for '17 E300, and to say that E300's "luxury features" are "comparable" to S550 is IMHO ridiculous (the price difference alone speaks volume - two E300s for one S550).
Each of us is entitled to an opinion. I will try to answer your question without bashing your 2014 CLS 550. Not polite.
The technology of the new 17 E Class is the next generation which the S Class will incorporate in its 2018 model. When selecting which model to lease, I am fortunate that all the MB vehicles were in play for me. I wanted a combination of new technology, the right size (the S Class is too big for my wife to drive), comfort, reliability (hopefully), reasonable performance and MPG, and a vehicle that looks great. The interior is steps above what was in my old E. Also important to me was to have friends and family fit in the back seat.
I lease my cars because the speed of technology advancements makes a 2 year old car very old. So, you might not agree with my take on the E but I suspect that the vast majority would.
So ... having said that, the E interior is in my view superior to my 2014 CLS ... it's updated, more flowing, better seats, nicer video screen, cooler lighting ... don't get me wrong, I loved my CLS and had no intention to trade, but when MBUSA couldn't fix the Distronic problem, I didn't have a choice. But I didn't get another one because I felt the interior looks dated at this point and I'm sure that the CLS will get a revamped interior sometime in the next couple of years. Bottom line is that what worked in 2014 looked old in 2016/17 and I didn't want to pay that kind of money for yesterday's look.
As for my comment about the S550, my perspective was that the S is the gold standard, and loved driving the loaner for 3 months. Note I said comparable... not superior to or even on the same l level. But considering that the loaner stickered for 45k more I think I can say that the E 300 gives a comparable experience. If threembs doesn't like my assessment then go read something else. With leather and the updated appearance i stand by my statement... the E gives a comparable feel to the S, just in a smaller and more affordable package. And the look and feel of the tech is superior to the more expensive S ... my opinion, but an accurate one if one is objective. And yes ... it may take a little time to learn the system, but an hour with the tech concierge at my dealer was a big help. Trying to figure out any new car while driving is probably not a good idea these days ... and I say that after testing out several different brands over ththe last couple of months.




So ... having said that, the E interior is in my view superior to my 2014 CLS ... it's updated, more flowing, better seats, nicer video screen, cooler lighting ... don't get me wrong, I loved my CLS and had no intention to trade, but when MBUSA couldn't fix the Distronic problem, I didn't have a choice. But I didn't get another one because I felt the interior looks dated at this point and I'm sure that the CLS will get a revamped interior sometime in the next couple of years. Bottom line is that what worked in 2014 looked old in 2016/17 and I didn't want to pay that kind of money for yesterday's look.
As for my comment about the S550, my perspective was that the S is the gold standard, and loved driving the loaner for 3 months. Note I said comparable... not superior to or even on the same l level. But considering that the loaner stickered for 45k more I think I can say that the E 300 gives a comparable experience. If threembs doesn't like my assessment then go read something else. With leather and the updated appearance i stand by my statement... the E gives a comparable feel to the S, just in a smaller and more affordable package. And the look and feel of the tech is superior to the more expensive S ... my opinion, but an accurate one if one is objective. And yes ... it may take a little time to learn the system, but an hour with the tech concierge at my dealer was a big help. Trying to figure out any new car while driving is probably not a good idea these days ... and I say that after testing out several different brands over ththe last couple of months.
Last edited by HBerman; Nov 22, 2016 at 08:56 PM.




My test drive was in the city, a place I seldom visit as I live in the country where the roads are in great condition, little traffic (including few police) and are all gently rolling and quite beautiful. You could run Formula One out here! The four cylinder E class just would not cut it the way I drive these roads and much of the technology is not needed. I also don't need a big back seat as there are only two of us and we seldom have passengers. In fact, the SUV was totally wasted for us as the last thing we need is a utility vehicle. Because my priority was fun, luxury and comfort - in that order, I took a look at the 2017 CLS. It was just as luxurious and comfortable as the E class in comfort mode but became a true beast in sports mode. What fun! Although the test drive was also in the city I did open it up a little and could tell (and hear!) the tremendous difference. This was a car born for my part of the country and my individual driving habits.
From the day i bought it I have enjoyed the CLS more than any other car I have had since my 1971 Formula Firebird. The CLS does not look like a small S or large C - it is distinctive, far more exclusive and the iconic "four door coupe" shape which created a new class of automobile is still one of the most beautiful pieces of metal on the road. The incredible 278 motor, along with the equally incredible 9 speed tranny, makes this a true driver's car when you want it to be, as well as a comfortable cruiser.
The CLS' individual looks and driver's aspect of this car makes it an admirable aberration in the Mercedes line. Engine displacements go lower and lower each year and the classes all start to look alike so I am happy to see the CLS is resisting this temptation. I just do not believe, at least in my situation, that I would be as happy with the E class in its current configuration. The bottom line is I have to have a luxury car that is fun to drive. To me, that is everything.




