EQE Catches on fire
He drove 4-ish hours towing a 10k lb boat and had to stop twice for charge. Both times the chargers weren't working at 100% power delivery. Because he was low on "gas", he had to unhitch his boat and leave it on the side of the road (parking lot) with his (attractive) wife sitting in it while he limped to a charger 5 miles further down the road. He unhitched because he thought (feared) he wouldn't make it to the charger hauling the boat.
This happened yesterday. It's as real as it gets. I'm not an EV person, however I keep my mind open. BIL's EV truck is beautiful and fun. But useless in the real world.
Fires, shrinking gas tank (battery range reduction in cold weather), poor charging infrastructure, inadequate battery range, heavy vehicle weight and poorer handling, unknown battery long term life and replacement cost. It's not for me.
Golf carts and grocery getters close to home - EVs are perfect for this. For real life, burning liquid hydrocarbons is the way to go.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Jul 30, 2023 at 05:29 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Our EQE now has close to 5k miles and has performed admirably in a whole range of temperatures so far. I'm keeping an eye on the story, but at this point, I feel very comfortable in the safety of the car.




No idea what caused the fire in the OP, but it was definitely not ambient temperature. Hope your mind is a little more at ease.
Cheers,
Uncle D
Last edited by Uncle D; Aug 22, 2023 at 10:14 AM.
No idea what caused the fire in the OP, but it was definitely ambient temperature. Hope your mind is a little more at ease.
Cheers,
Uncle D
It has caught fire.
Best advice at this point is exit the vehicle.
nomex underwear may help.
Depends what catches, doesn't it. Non-electric parts common to vehicles regardless of propulsion can smoulder a bit, or rapidly reach a peak energy output between 2MW and 6MW[1] which is undesirable to be close to.
the addition of 58kWh of rlectrical energy, or 40 litres of burning petroleum running downhill[2] are merely the icing on an already unattractive cake.
Merry crimbo etc all of you.
[1][2] see the fire service report of the Liverpool parking structure fire referring also to fire laboratory work. Google for the big PDF
i replaced my A class with an ID.3 after trying the EQA which is very nice. We will run yhe SLK for years yet if all goes well. As a suggestion, prefer vehicles designed de novo as BEVs to ICEVs or to EVs built on a platform designed for ICEVs, unless it is an interesting conversion.

Empirically, the Liverpool, Norwegian, and Luton, large parking structures were ICEVFs, and had the common factors of a ceiling and running fuel. And building replacement. Used extinguishers were visible beside the Luton firestarter. Which implies bravery.
The Dutch experience of a single EV catching fire - under the bonnet - in a municipal garage was that thd sprinkler put it out and they didn't need a new building. I suspect the vehicle didn't go back into service, few do.



Empirically, the Liverpool, Norwegian, and Luton, large parking structures were ICEVFs, and had the common factors of a ceiling and running fuel. And building replacement. Used extinguishers were visible beside the Luton firestarter. Which implies bravery.
The Dutch experience of a single EV catching fire - under the bonnet - in a municipal garage was that thd sprinkler put it out and they didn't need a new building. I suspect the vehicle didn't go back into service, few do.
The gravamen of the Dutch experience was that the EV fire didn't burn the building down, cf the UK's two experiences and the Norwegians' one were that the ICEV ones did burn the building down. The fires are very extensively analysed and reported in big PDFs, really easy to find by people who care to.
There are a couple of other relevant reports, also easy to find.
If you happened to be building a car park (or even parking in one) you might find this interesting
https://assets.publishing.service.go...c-vehicles.pdf






