EQS Test Drives coming to select cities. Register now.




good luck with your W222 old man.





The Best of Mercedes & AMG








BTW I just ordered the BMW IX as well for my wife. Not sure if she will like it, but her GLE450 will be 2 years old in January, and so I think we will be ready for a new SUV by the summer. The EQE SUV which won't be available for a couple of year is my guess. I'm also going to order the next generation Porsche 718 when that is announced. Apparently it will also be an EV. Sports car makes more sense in my garage than a Cybertruck.
Last edited by stealth.pilot; Oct 11, 2021 at 08:24 AM.
I have always enjoyed my MB when they are parked. Walking up to my beautiful S Coupe stirs more emotion in me than when I step of the pedal.
Lets stop being MB apologists, fanboys, and shills. DubVBenz was right. The exterior design is a disaster. There is no argument that this will be the ugliest car in the current MB lineup.
It may even be the ugliest car they have ever made. And IMO its ugly for no reason. Tesla and Lucid were able to get better range without resorting to jelly bean on wheels.
No frunk, a Chargeport that lacks simple luxury, an unnecessary and unsightly windshield washer port. The only thing they got right on the exterior is the Aero wheels. MB is the only one making aero wheels that actually look good.
I have a deposits placed for both a Lucid and an EQS. If I cant get the EQS with all the luxuries promised (Comfort Doors are potentially not available) then there is no way I can drive such a monstrosity without all the tech toys to justify buying such a design...
Even though I am still considering buying the car without comfort doors... I am such a MB fanboy.. SMH lol
Tesla Model S - stripped down vehicle with 10 year old design and lacking basic luxury features like massage seats, Apple CarPlay, Surround View Cameras, Ambient lighting, etc. The equipment levels on a Model S are more suited to competing with a Toyota or a Ford. The car is poorly built - lacks chassis rigidity which is really important to having a solid feel when driving. The obsession with the glass roof with no central cross bar leads to flex. The glass roof is also non dimmable and it radiates a ton of heat in the summer. No shade on the side windows either, although not surprising given lack of shade on roof.
Lucid - good effort, but it has those quirky mismatched seats, the door panels look cheap, and it has an excessively large glass roof with no sun shade (the photochromic glass doesn't properly darken the cabin). Also no side window shades. The feature set on this car are barely matching what you get on a Lexus or Acura, and well short of what you can get from a BMW or Mercedes. The same goes for the cabin finishes.
Taycan - beautiful car but tiny. The car is effectively three seater since the space behind the driver is not usable. In my test drive the drivers seat was touching the back seat. With a rear facing child seat in the back on the passenger side, the front passenger would also be cramped.




Based on comments posted to the Car and Driver review of the 450+ you are not alone in your critique of the EQS styling.
One of many such comments.
"Mercedes wrecked their design language in an attempt to extract a few more miles of range out of this jelly bean"
Best comment was
"Lucid in the sky with diamonds"
I do respect Mercedes for letting form follow function. It's not like they don't know what it looks like particularly in light of the fact that they have designed some of the most beautiful classic cars on the planet. I suspect that it will be an acquired taste. It is starting to grow on me particularly in the EQE form.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Oct 11, 2021 at 11:05 PM.





