Performance Upgrade Subscriptions








The EQS AMG costs $20k more than a 580 and delivers a 0.5 second improvement in acceleration. And BTW The AMG get's marked up by 50k most of the time, so it's really $70k extra.. If that's okay, then why is it not okay to spend an extra $1200 a year to get a second when you own the car for 2-3 years. Certainly more bang for buck.
Do you need a second? no. But you also don't need a Mercedes Benz.




The EQS AMG costs $20k more than a 580 and delivers a 0.5 second improvement in acceleration. And BTW The AMG get's marked up by 50k most of the time, so it's really $70k extra.. If that's okay, then why is it not okay to spend an extra $1200 a year to get a second when you own the car for 2-3 years. Certainly more bang for buck.
Do you need a second? no. But you also don't need a Mercedes Benz.








Trending Topics
I regret very much your interpretation of my thoughts and wording.
In a number of threads and topics here, contrary opinions have often been posted in far stronger terms than mine.
Of course, you are entitled to have and express your opinions.
That’s all I have done, without resorting to an “ad hominem” attack, as it pleased you to do.
Gratefully…
Last edited by Newbyloub; Nov 23, 2022 at 10:25 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

It's a similar concept to an IC engine where timing can be changed to provide more power without any hardware changes.
For the sake of example take two motors
100 kW that weights 200 lbs
200 kW that weights 400 lbs
It does make sense for the more powerful motor to be heavier. Correct?
Take two cars first equipped with the first motor. It will have 100 kW power.
Second car has the second motor and will have two options to pay or not to pay annual fee.
If it doesn't than it will have the motor "crippled" to 100 kW and will have the same power as the first car but will carry 200 lbs more all the time.




I originally posted my opinion, above, on an Audi forum of e-tron GT owners (I have one) and we had a lively debate about it. Someone had written that the hack would probably void the warranty. Here was my response:
For those interested in the law, the provision of the Act placing the burden of proof on the manufacturer (“warrantor” in the Act), can be found at 15 U.S. Code § 2304(c). It provides that the warrantor’s obligation of repair (in § 2304(a)) “shall not be required . . . if [the warrantor] can show that the defect, malfunction, or failure of any consumer product . . . was caused by damage . . . while in the possession of the consumer, or unreasonable use (including failure to provide reasonable and necessary maintenance).”
I have been a trial lawyer for a little over 50 years and have successfully handled numerous Lemon Law cases for myself (unfortunately) and for friends. It's not my area of expertise, however.
Last edited by hlothery; Nov 27, 2022 at 04:54 PM.








We'll need to see the paperwork in order to determine MBUSA's justification.
This European source sheds some light on it
https://www.arenaev.com/exclusive_we...p-news-145.php
Apparently the "upgraded" EQS 450 4 MATIC is absolutely the same as EQS 500 4 MATIC, or to put it in another way 450 is "restricted power" version of 500 so that an "upgrade" can be offered.
500 is not available in the US but it is available in Europe and costs 3,000 euro more than 450. So instead of offering it in the US for $3,000 more MB wants to milk $1,200 per year in perpetuity. Not a bad deal I calculated it at 40% return on $3,000 loan over 10 years.
Last edited by ivanvach; Nov 27, 2022 at 10:37 PM.




This European source sheds some light on it
https://www.arenaev.com/exclusive_we...p-news-145.php
Apparently the "upgraded" EQS 450 4 MATIC is absolutely the same as EQS 500 4 MATIC, or to put it in another way 450 is "restricted power" version of 500 so that an "upgrade" can be offered.
500 is not available in the US but it is available in Europe and costs 3,000 euro more than 450. So instead of offering it in the US for $3,000 more MB wants to milk $1,200 per year in perpetuity. Not a bad deal I calculated it at 40% return on $3,000 loan over 10 years.




