G55 AMG Kompressor
I will remain essentially unchanged except for the increased power and associated modifications. There is also talk of a Jubilee model of the G500 to celebrate the 25th Anniversary of the G-Class, though the details of that are unknown.
Expect performance and specs to be on par or slightly better than the Porsche Cayenne Turbo, though of course it will be far behind when it comes to handling. It will also be more expensive than the current G55.
Ted
Ted
Trending Topics
.........as follow up, the Prsche Cayenne Turbo was tested by motor trend as 0-60 in 5.4 secs and quatermile in 13.79secs @ 102.5mph. Car and driver tested Kleeman G55K as 0-60 at 5.2 secs with quatermile in 14secs @99MPH. Looks like the Kleemann G55 K is faster from 0-60 and then levels off while Porsche then takes over. Also I have info from the owner of the G55K that he has done a 0-60 in 4.9 secs. If the AMG G55 V8K will perform like the Cayenne turbo, then Kleeman G55K might be faster because it will not suffer from the usual problem of Kleeman spercharged V8 cars which is too much Hp and no traction.
Ted
the problem is the Coeficient of Drag or Cx gap between the Porsche and the "G"...is HUGE......on the other hand, with the current ML you do not have that problem
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Ted
..............you may be fighting a battle that doesn't really exist. The Kompressor G55 is not available and was not available when either you or me bought ours. I was aware that the Kompressor version was coming and rather than waiting, I made my analysis and made a decision that I am very pleased with. What I do with my cars is to modify them to my taste and never sell them. As a result no car that I own is exactly stock. Even if I waited for the Kompressor G55, it will not be stock in my hands........I would have wanted to modify it to over 500HP with rentech chip and pulley just like the W211 E55 owners are doing now. This not really a thread about whether or not the AMG Kompressor G55 is better or not better than the Kleemann Kompressor G55.
Ted
Ted
Since we have several cars in our garage ( incl. a new 575 Maranello ), I use the G for what it was meant for in its original design.
Even with the standart 350 HP, the car can be dangerous in corners due to its high center of gravity. A Kompressor really does not make alot of sense with this chassis and all you happy G55 owners should not worry about missing out on something.
If you want a faster car, buy a Gallardo or 575.
JMHO
cheers
ps. obviously I would choose as a new buyer the unreasonable G55K today, lol
some pics : http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/groups/g_10...6ebRABfL4aBrZP
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/groups/g_10...6ebRABfXjqHSyv
Last edited by Romanee_Conti; Mar 3, 2004 at 05:29 AM.
Ted
cheers
To give you an idea of the power that the Kleemann supercharger makes my G55, tested by Car and Driver, ran 0-60 in 4.9 seconds, qtr mile in 13.9seconds,(traction control completely disabled) vs the factory G55k's 5.6 seconds. I have to admit it would have been nice to buy an AMG version with a kompressor direct from Mercedes (with Kleemann exhaust, headers, ECU tune, and cams) but I wasn't willing to wait. However, I have no regrets as Kleemann did a great job, 25,000 miles and not one single problem. Next week my G goes back to Kleemann for upgraded cams and Kleemann headers. I'll post dyno charts when I have them.
Is a 500 -600 hp truck stupid and impractical? Yes, but it sure is fun.
..............Nice to finally gert a chance to talk to you. As you know I too have a Kleemann G55K with high flow cats. I have been interested in getting a further boost by using the boost kit provided by Kleemann. I am not sure how much more HP gain the boost kits provide and if there are any engine management issues. As far as I know, there are two Kleemann G55's in the USA and so getting more info has been difficult. Does your G55K have a boost kit or now, and if so, what are your thoughts and if not, why not?
Ted
I do have the boost kit installed and it made a substantial difference. I'm at altitude, since I live in Colorado, so even with the boost kit I'm only making about the same level of boost as you're making at sea level. I'm not sure if Kleemann would recommend a boost kit on your G55 since you're at sea level, but I may be wrong. If Kleemann is comfortable cranking up your boost I would defenitely have it installed. I'm having headers and cams installed sometime in the next couple of weeks. I'll let you know how much additional power the truck makes after the install.
You've mentioned that it is difficult to use all of the power that your truck makes on the road because of the handling (truck like) characteristics of a G class. I agree with you. It's fun until you hit the twisties at which point it's a little scary if you're not careful. Every once in a while I'll take my truck to our local 1/4 mile track. It's a lot fun to see the look on people's faces when they get beat by a "tank." A couple of weeks ago I raced an NSX a beat him, the guy driving couldn't believe it.
I'm extremly impressed with Kleemann. I've gotten to know the guys well and have driven several of their cars at the 1/4 mile strip and on the road. Not only are they great guys but it's amazing what some of their vehicles are capable of. My father has an 2004 E55 which would get smoked by Kleemann's modified 2001 E55. I've gotten so hooked on the 1/4 mile strip because of these guys that I purchased a Mitsubishi Evolution just for racing (still street legal) that they are modifying for me during their spare time, which isn't very often. The Evo now puts down 550whp. These guys really know what they are doing.
I read all of the debate on this forum about who is better, Kleemann, Renntech, Brabus, Evosport, AMG, etc., and I think most people are missing the point. They are all excellent tuners and each one takes a unique approach. People talk about the dangers of supercharging as a means to bash Kleemann. I've owned over a dozen modified (supercharged) vehicles in my life going all the way back to a 1984 Ford Bronco with a Paxton supercharger. I've never once had a single problem with any of these vehicles that was a result of the supercharger. As long as the tuner is capable, supercharging is a safe and reliable means of making big horsepower. Kleemann is as good as they come in my opinion.
Have fun with your G.
Anyways, it seems that the design remains exactly the same, interior or exterior. Apart from the Kompressor sign added on both sides of the car. (see pics).
I'm about to order in Paris, France a regular G55AMG with some coll extra options for a total cost of 115 000 Euros. With the same options, the price in Europe for the supercharged model will be around, with some cool extra options, about 135 000 Euros which I find nuts. Do you think that since the new G model (not looking very exciting) is about to come out, the then become former version (ours) will come down in price??
Yann.
Ted
What is good though is to sell a car before it is delivered: I was #1 on the order list of the coming Aston Martin V8 and since I didn't find the DB9 (to which it looks like) very sexy, I just sold my order list position for 30 000 Euros. That was a good deal!! Now I'm getting a new Porsche Turbo S instead ( I used to hate Porsche before, what's happening to me) and the 30 000 Euros will almost cover the extra cost. I love the idea. Who said new cars were not an investment.



