Mercedes-Benz named Consumer Reports least-reliable
The magazine's testing staff called Chrysler's hatchback Caliber one of the most disappointing new cars, citing what it called "unimpressive" mileage and a "poorly finished" interior.
In addition, eight Mercedes-Benz vehicles were named to Consumer Reports least-reliable list, the most for any brand.
Champion said many of the problems reported by Mercedes owners concerned glitches in the electrical, audio and power systems for their cars.
Mercedes-Benz spokeswoman Donna Boland said the reliability survey did not reflect the automaker's most recent efforts to work out bugs in those areas. "We did have some issues, but I think the great majority of those have been resolved to the satisfaction of owners," she said.
A total of 20 vehicles on the least-reliable list were from U.S. automakers, including 12 from GM, five from Ford and three from the Chrysler Group.
Chrysler spokesman Sam Locricchio said he expected the automaker's stepped-up investment in quality in recent years would start to be reflected in coming reliability surveys.
"I think you're going to see some dramatic improvements," he said
... now that CR is no longer doing so, it has totally been discredited as a source of any information.
Same for JD Powers or any other surveyor.
IMO, its the legendary name that keeps this brand on top and not it's current product.
EDIT: I mean ditto.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Second, and I don't know this for sure, but I've been told a lot of the negative surveys for JD and CR are due to consumers thinking something is broken when infact they don't know how to use it or are unwilling to real a 700+ page manual for their car. Heck, the average person won't read a 200 page book in an entire year, so its a dream if they're going to read the car's manual.
Mercedes could build a car as reliable as the 1989 420SEL I drive, which is a few years shy of its 20th bday, but they'd have to strip it down to what technology is in my 420SEL.
But that can't explain everything. MB's poor scores across the board cannot be attributed to owners disliking their brake systems or disliking their fully functional electronics or being unhappy with their fuel economy.
No one wanted to acknowledge the drop in quality at first. Some of us came out of denial before others (some MBW members are still in denial, though). Finally MB management came out of denial and has been making a PR effort to convince everyone they are making an honest effort to solve all the problems. Hopefully they will be true to their word.
Well they have active body cont... oh no they don't.
What about distronic plu... nope, none of that either.
Perhaps a V12 with 590lb-ft tor.... nope.
Oh, what about a V8 with 516lb-ft tor... another no.
Well, to Lexus' credit, they have copied the Germans in terms of options very well. Keyless Go, Distronic, etc.
I don't see LS460l's parking themselves accurately either

I didn't mention the active lighting because everyone has it, I only mentioned Mercedes specific / Lexus-lacking.

The point of my post was that Lexus' don't have AS MANY things as Mercedes does usually. Such is the cost of our reliability. You can't have your cake and eat it too -- at least yet. Lexus still has a ways to go until it's the perfect car. That's why their motto is the Passionate Pursuit of Perfection




You're welcome....

