C43 vs. C32
I know this may have been posted before, probably more than once, but I would appreciate getting a more current opinion.
Also, any concerns on the upkeep/maintenance of a supercharged V-6 vs. a naturally aspired V-8?
Thanks.
Some magazine reviews I have read have said the C43 is destined to be a classic MB car.
I like the w202 styling.
I would go with the C43

Oh, as reliability goes, I think the N/A V8 may outlast a Supercharged V6, due to the stress on the V6, but MB's have proven their kompressor engines so far so it is a tough choice. But I would go with the C43 cuz of rarity (spelling?)

Go for the C43
As for the reliability issue, depends always on the way you treat your car.
Since the S/C on the V6 is only engaged while flooring it, I doubt it shouldnt last as long as any other V6. The V8 is built to last, so I guess it only depends when going over 200'000 km's..
Both car have their advantages and disadvantages. While in the C43 you have the awesome V8 sound, you can tune the C32 more easily and so on..
Can't really help you with the answer, I love both of em..



