Location, location, location!
#26
85mm,
I agree with you. I think the iPOD sounds pretty good in the GL. Again, considering the source of the music, it's not that bad for casual listening as you are driving along. MPEG is what it is, music with small files, the compression algorithms do a good job. Engineers and physicists are smart people!
Gordon
I agree with you. I think the iPOD sounds pretty good in the GL. Again, considering the source of the music, it's not that bad for casual listening as you are driving along. MPEG is what it is, music with small files, the compression algorithms do a good job. Engineers and physicists are smart people!
Gordon
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
You are talking about a major project...I am sure you have to get at it from inside and that would mean taking the head liner down and what else is only conjecture. I am sure MB placed the antenna in the best possible location to get the best possible signal.
Don't let a few dropouts or the quality get to you. I think the music I get is fine for traveling at 80mph with wind noise and other noises you get inside a car. If better quality is your concern, get some DVD audio disks and play them in your DVD player or use the CD player. I buy into gordo's rationale and take car audio for what it is...a compromise. If you want better quality go to a audio mod shop and totally customize your sound system. Just my 2 cents...:-)
Don't let a few dropouts or the quality get to you. I think the music I get is fine for traveling at 80mph with wind noise and other noises you get inside a car. If better quality is your concern, get some DVD audio disks and play them in your DVD player or use the CD player. I buy into gordo's rationale and take car audio for what it is...a compromise. If you want better quality go to a audio mod shop and totally customize your sound system. Just my 2 cents...:-)
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
GL450 (Alabaster White/Black Interior)
Hi Everyone,
You know I always chuckle when the forum gets into the discussion of the poor sound quality of satellite radio and the iPOD integration. My question is poor sound quality compared to what? Another car, at home, what?
All of these formats are so digitized and so compressed it's ridiculous. I am an audiophile and was engrossed in the literature when CD's were first introduced and the sampling rate of 44.1kHz was feared to be way to low!! Now when you add MPEG compression of any type, your file size is so small it looses quality. It can't be at "CD Quality" as Apple likes to state. Then add the fact that you are listening on a car audio system and you are not going to have great sound.
Listen to quality audio at home with your CD"s. Be happy you have so many choices of music in your car for entertainment.
Our kids, the MPEG generation, will never understand quality audio, because it is all about convenience now, which mean small file sizes.
Remember the days of an analog dial AM/FM radio in the center of the dash with a 5 by 9 inch oval speaker on the top of the dash. I do. I am amazed and satisfied with what the engineers have managed to put into the GL for entertainment, AM/FM radio, iPOD, satelite radio, DVD players, 6 CD changer, game ports!
My 2 cents.
Gordon
You know I always chuckle when the forum gets into the discussion of the poor sound quality of satellite radio and the iPOD integration. My question is poor sound quality compared to what? Another car, at home, what?
All of these formats are so digitized and so compressed it's ridiculous. I am an audiophile and was engrossed in the literature when CD's were first introduced and the sampling rate of 44.1kHz was feared to be way to low!! Now when you add MPEG compression of any type, your file size is so small it looses quality. It can't be at "CD Quality" as Apple likes to state. Then add the fact that you are listening on a car audio system and you are not going to have great sound.
Listen to quality audio at home with your CD"s. Be happy you have so many choices of music in your car for entertainment.
Our kids, the MPEG generation, will never understand quality audio, because it is all about convenience now, which mean small file sizes.
Remember the days of an analog dial AM/FM radio in the center of the dash with a 5 by 9 inch oval speaker on the top of the dash. I do. I am amazed and satisfied with what the engineers have managed to put into the GL for entertainment, AM/FM radio, iPOD, satelite radio, DVD players, 6 CD changer, game ports!
My 2 cents.
Gordon
Gordon, in my case I am comparing the GL sound system to my wife's Honda Odyssey (i.e. a $30,000+ car versus a $60,000+ car). I am completely serious when I say the GL sound system is not any better/slightly inferior to hers (in all fairness she does have the Touring model which has the upgraded system). I am also comparing the GL sound system to other cars I have ridden in (Lexus, BMW, etc.) and feel it is just not that good. I paid for the upgraded system in my GL and my guess is that the regular GL system is probably just as good. I completely agree that the speakers in the GL are not going to sound as good as my Paradigm's at home and nor would I expect them to. And yes I remember the days of installing a set of 6X9's in the rear deck of my car and do appreciate the modern car's conviences but expect a whole lot more with the price tag on these vehicles. I am not trying to be argumentative, but as an audiophile, you really think the sound system in the GL is good?
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: .
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 GL450
Yeh . I know all about the " golden ear " audiophile world where half million dollar 10 watt mono amps designed to produce a sound pressure level barely above a whisper , sitting one foot away in the perfect nearfield spot of a set of vintage 60s Quad screens , playing a Fritz Reiner Chicago Symphony LP pressed nearly 50 years ago ....and swearing that if you close your eyes you are standing right next to the conductor at the moment the recording was made ... hearing the breathing of the violinists ....:OTOH, I've witnessed some of these phenomena and it IS spooky . There is audio and atmospheric room info in the grooves of well made older LPs that will probably never be fully extracted , as the audiophile market has gone more digital as the " old guys " in the hobby fade away . After all, the sampling rate of audio info in an analog LP is in the "gajillions".
Last edited by MKW; 09-19-2007 at 07:29 PM.
#31
Beancounter,
Thanks for your response. I am not trying to argue either. I just trying to help define the complaints relative to the fact that we are all listening in a truck.
Example of defining the complaints: you say the GL sound system is "not any better/slightly inferior to the Honda" minivan. So it's the same (= not any better)? Or what to you hear that makes it "slightly" inferior? To shear slight differences is to say that you have done real comparisons with the bass and treble equalized and the sound pressure levels exactly the same, etc., etc.. Removed all the variables.
I actually think that the bass and treble control and the balance and fade control (joystick) in the GL is quite effective.
In terms of being an audiophile and commenting on whether the sound in the Gl is good or not, I can't do that, because what is my reference. It is what it is for a truck.
I can get adequate bass and I can turn up the treble to get enough crispness in the high end to satisfy me. I works and it sounds OK over engine noise and road noise.
I think all vehicle stereo systems are going to be "just OK" for what they are designed for.
Thanks again.
Gordon
Thanks for your response. I am not trying to argue either. I just trying to help define the complaints relative to the fact that we are all listening in a truck.
Example of defining the complaints: you say the GL sound system is "not any better/slightly inferior to the Honda" minivan. So it's the same (= not any better)? Or what to you hear that makes it "slightly" inferior? To shear slight differences is to say that you have done real comparisons with the bass and treble equalized and the sound pressure levels exactly the same, etc., etc.. Removed all the variables.
I actually think that the bass and treble control and the balance and fade control (joystick) in the GL is quite effective.
In terms of being an audiophile and commenting on whether the sound in the Gl is good or not, I can't do that, because what is my reference. It is what it is for a truck.
I can get adequate bass and I can turn up the treble to get enough crispness in the high end to satisfy me. I works and it sounds OK over engine noise and road noise.
I think all vehicle stereo systems are going to be "just OK" for what they are designed for.
Thanks again.
Gordon
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
If better quality is your concern, get some DVD audio disks and play them in your DVD player or use the CD player. I buy into gordo's rationale and take car audio for what it is...a compromise. If you want better quality go to a audio mod shop and totally customize your sound system.
As for aftermarket, I have gone that route. It's a nightmare of transient teenagers whose only qualification is knowing the difference between wire cutters and electrical tape. This is true whether I've gone to the big names or specialty custom shops. And then you lose COMAND functions on top of that. No, thank you. Not again.
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
I thought you had the RSE.
#34
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 BMW 540i/6-speed, 2008 GL550
I just listened to the iPod using Loudness, and I thought it sounded fantastic. I suppose that a purist might find it unnatural, but to me it was very punchy but crisp at the same time.
#37
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 BMW 540i/6-speed, 2008 GL550
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LA LA Land
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'07 GL 450, '02 S 80 T6
oknish,
I was following your line of thought about audio in a car until you said "we should at least get same (did you mean some) fidelity regardless of source."
Define what you mean by fidelity. Do mean equal quality and representation of all relevant frequenices in the music, close to the orginal event, that is high fidelity recording and play back.
Or did you simply mean equal dynamic range or volume as you switch between sources. I agree with that, I have to turn up the volume on the iPOD to match the volume of the rest of the sources. That's a dynamic range matching problem since the iPOD has it's own internal volume control and recording adjustments. I have differnent volumes between songs on the same playlist.
In any event, my basic point is high fidelity discussions are difficult with car audio and severe digital compression formats are not in the realm of high fidelity.
Gordon
I was following your line of thought about audio in a car until you said "we should at least get same (did you mean some) fidelity regardless of source."
Define what you mean by fidelity. Do mean equal quality and representation of all relevant frequenices in the music, close to the orginal event, that is high fidelity recording and play back.
Or did you simply mean equal dynamic range or volume as you switch between sources. I agree with that, I have to turn up the volume on the iPOD to match the volume of the rest of the sources. That's a dynamic range matching problem since the iPOD has it's own internal volume control and recording adjustments. I have differnent volumes between songs on the same playlist.
In any event, my basic point is high fidelity discussions are difficult with car audio and severe digital compression formats are not in the realm of high fidelity.
Gordon
Gordon - what I meant by fidelity was "equal dynamic range or volume" as you put it so succinctly.
#40
I just tried adjusting the EQ on my ipod including the Loudness setting and am still get poor sound. Again, I'm no audiophile. I did notice that the sound quality difference between the cd changer and ipod is most noticeable for rap songs which I gather most of you won't lose sleep over.
Example 1. I downloaded Kanye West's new album from itunes and also burned it on a cd. I played 'good life' and it sounds great on the cd changer. From the ipod it really sounds muffled like it can't play the vocals, rythm and bass in the right balance.
Example 2. I downloaded a bunch of Eagles songs from itunes and also burned them on a cd. It actually sounds just fine out of the ipod, but when I play the cd, the cd output just has more punch to it.
In both cases, it's just not a volume issue. It's as if the ipod aux kit is muffling the music and throwing the balance off. When I shuffled through various types of music, the ipod was actually just fine except for pop or rap songs. I'll compare some Coltrane next but I'm thinking there will be a significant difference.
Example 1. I downloaded Kanye West's new album from itunes and also burned it on a cd. I played 'good life' and it sounds great on the cd changer. From the ipod it really sounds muffled like it can't play the vocals, rythm and bass in the right balance.
Example 2. I downloaded a bunch of Eagles songs from itunes and also burned them on a cd. It actually sounds just fine out of the ipod, but when I play the cd, the cd output just has more punch to it.
In both cases, it's just not a volume issue. It's as if the ipod aux kit is muffling the music and throwing the balance off. When I shuffled through various types of music, the ipod was actually just fine except for pop or rap songs. I'll compare some Coltrane next but I'm thinking there will be a significant difference.
#41
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LA LA Land
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'07 GL 450, '02 S 80 T6
Originally Posted by sraj
I just listened to the iPod using Loudness, and I thought it sounded fantastic. I suppose that a purist might find it unnatural, but to me it was very punchy but crisp at the same time.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LA LA Land
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'07 GL 450, '02 S 80 T6
Originally Posted by 85mm
In both cases, it's just not a volume issue. It's as if the ipod aux kit is muffling the music and throwing the balance off.
#43
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 BMW 540i/6-speed, 2008 GL550
I'm a little new to iTunes and iPod, but I think that the settings in the EQ function on the iPod affect playback only. iTunes is probably where you adjust the recording quality. I've always only used the default settings to record into iTunes.
#44
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 BMW 540i/6-speed, 2008 GL550
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LA LA Land
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
'07 GL 450, '02 S 80 T6
Originally Posted by sraj
That's odd, for me there was a night and day difference. Maybe differences in the source music change the effect of the loudness setting?
Time to get a new iPod for car. YAY..........
#46
History Of The Loudness Control
This has been a good discussion on audio and I have enjoyed the thread. Thanks.
I wanted to add something, so maybe we can all listen for the same thing. Pardon me if this is common knowledge to everyone, but I thought from the way the thread was going I would add this information.
The history of the "loudness" control has nothing to do with gain or volume. There used to be a switch on amplifiers called "Loudness." You don't see it too often anymore. Here was the point.
Lets say you are listening to music at home at a relatively high volume and the music sounds really good to you. But then you realize you are disturbing someone in the next room and you turn down the volume/gain by half. This lower volume causes you loose more bass response then you do midrange or treble response and your music is going to sound different. Because it takes more power to drive the woofer, to move the cones, to move the air that makes the bass. So that is when you would engage the loudness switch. It would "roll-in" extra bass frequencies to make up for the removal of power from the woofers. It was a pretty rough estimate at correction but that was the concept. If you had loudness engaged when you were listening at regular volumes the bass would be too much and sound "boomy."
I am not sure how Apple implements "loudness" with the iPOD but I'll bet the concept is the same. It is probably increasing the bass response slightly. It actually seems weird to me that the iPOD would even have the control since the small amplifier is really designed to drive little ear buds.
Anyway, in the GL try to listen for an increase in bass when you engage the loudness on the iPOD. I will fool around with this for my own test although I hate playing with the menu and submenus in the iPOD.
Thanks for the discussion.
Gordon
I wanted to add something, so maybe we can all listen for the same thing. Pardon me if this is common knowledge to everyone, but I thought from the way the thread was going I would add this information.
The history of the "loudness" control has nothing to do with gain or volume. There used to be a switch on amplifiers called "Loudness." You don't see it too often anymore. Here was the point.
Lets say you are listening to music at home at a relatively high volume and the music sounds really good to you. But then you realize you are disturbing someone in the next room and you turn down the volume/gain by half. This lower volume causes you loose more bass response then you do midrange or treble response and your music is going to sound different. Because it takes more power to drive the woofer, to move the cones, to move the air that makes the bass. So that is when you would engage the loudness switch. It would "roll-in" extra bass frequencies to make up for the removal of power from the woofers. It was a pretty rough estimate at correction but that was the concept. If you had loudness engaged when you were listening at regular volumes the bass would be too much and sound "boomy."
I am not sure how Apple implements "loudness" with the iPOD but I'll bet the concept is the same. It is probably increasing the bass response slightly. It actually seems weird to me that the iPOD would even have the control since the small amplifier is really designed to drive little ear buds.
Anyway, in the GL try to listen for an increase in bass when you engage the loudness on the iPOD. I will fool around with this for my own test although I hate playing with the menu and submenus in the iPOD.
Thanks for the discussion.
Gordon
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
No, I didn't get the RSE, and I can't listen to live news on a CD or a DVD unfortunately, which is what I primarily use the sat radio for. The source of my dissatisfaction stems from a long term relationship with XM in several vehicles, which drops out maybe 5% of the time that Sirius drops out. Honestly, it's about that much. And as for why I think MB didn't necessarily put the antenna where it'd get the best reception is because I think they put it where it'd get good GPS reception and telephone transciever operations for everyone, rather than including a different antenna in a different location for Sirius. I think the engineers were looking at the larger world market for placement rather than the smaller American market. IMHO. And also my reception is okay, but very often on what I'd consider open road under clear skies, there's a distinct compressed quality to the voice I hear, as if the signal is weak. It makes me almost afraid to go the music channels sometimes.
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
No, I didn't get the RSE, and I can't listen to live news on a CD or a DVD unfortunately, which is what I primarily use the sat radio for. The source of my dissatisfaction stems from a long term relationship with XM in several vehicles, which drops out maybe 5% of the time that Sirius drops out. Honestly, it's about that much. And as for why I think MB didn't necessarily put the antenna where it'd get the best reception is because I think they put it where it'd get good GPS reception and telephone transciever operations for everyone, rather than including a different antenna in a different location for Sirius. I think the engineers were looking at the larger world market for placement rather than the smaller American market. IMHO. And also my reception is okay, but very often on what I'd consider open road under clear skies, there's a distinct compressed quality to the voice I hear, as if the signal is weak. It makes me almost afraid to go the music channels sometimes.
But as far as dropouts, they just do not occur very often, nor did they on the trip from Denver.
#49
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2015 GL550, 2019 GLC350e
I have Sirius in my C55, which btw the antenna is located on top of the trunk. Same poor reception, so I'm convince moving the antenna will improve the reception.
This is one big reason why I have hesitated activating it on the GL.
Maybe it's not Sirius but the actual antenna, which I believed is made by a Chrysler subsidiary company, Mopar? (I read that some where)
It's bad enough the reception drops so easy, but it's also very annoying the song title/artist is also lost and goes back to the station name when the signal is returned.
This is one big reason why I have hesitated activating it on the GL.
Maybe it's not Sirius but the actual antenna, which I believed is made by a Chrysler subsidiary company, Mopar? (I read that some where)
It's bad enough the reception drops so easy, but it's also very annoying the song title/artist is also lost and goes back to the station name when the signal is returned.
#50
Junior Member
I have Sirius in my C55, which btw the antenna is located on top of the trunk. Same poor reception, so I'm convince moving the antenna will improve the reception.
This is one big reason why I have hesitated activating it on the GL.
Maybe it's not Sirius but the actual antenna, which I believed is made by a Chrysler subsidiary company, Mopar? (I read that some where)
It's bad enough the reception drops so easy, but it's also very annoying the song title/artist is also lost and goes back to the station name when the signal is returned.
This is one big reason why I have hesitated activating it on the GL.
Maybe it's not Sirius but the actual antenna, which I believed is made by a Chrysler subsidiary company, Mopar? (I read that some where)
It's bad enough the reception drops so easy, but it's also very annoying the song title/artist is also lost and goes back to the station name when the signal is returned.