GL Class (X164) 2007-2012: GL320CDI, GL420CDI, GL450, GL550

GL320 Speed vs RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-06-2008, 11:01 PM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
chieftam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL320CDI, C6 Corvette, 1969 Corvair Convertible
GL320 Speed vs RPM

A new GL320CDI owner here with a question. Just got my GL320 after years of Ford Powerstroke diesels. My Powerstrokes would loaf along at about 1750 rpm at 70 mph with 3.73 gears. With a seven speed auto, two overdrives and 3.45 gears, I was suprised to find my MB running at 2000 rpm at 65 mph. I can't seem to find the ratios for the overdrives, but it seems like this is a little high. Is this the normal rpm range? An online review by Edmunds, I think, said they were hitting 2000 rpm at 65 in 6th gear, and it dropped even lower in 7th. Only 325 miles so far, but am I not getting into 7th? Other than that, love the vehicle. Thanks for the help.
Old 05-06-2008, 11:13 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
scottybdiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
Originally Posted by chieftam
A new GL320CDI owner here with a question. Just got my GL320 after years of Ford Powerstroke diesels. My Powerstrokes would loaf along at about 1750 rpm at 70 mph with 3.73 gears. With a seven speed auto, two overdrives and 3.45 gears, I was suprised to find my MB running at 2000 rpm at 65 mph. I can't seem to find the ratios for the overdrives, but it seems like this is a little high. Is this the normal rpm range? An online review by Edmunds, I think, said they were hitting 2000 rpm at 65 in 6th gear, and it dropped even lower in 7th. Only 325 miles so far, but am I not getting into 7th? Other than that, love the vehicle. Thanks for the help.
I too came to the GL 320 after many years driving a Powerstroke. Actually, my wife drives the GL, but I have noticed that it runs at considerably higher RPM's than the Powerstrokes or my current Duramax. The idea of getting that much torque and HP from a 3.0L V6 is still mind blowing to me. I think it has to work a little harder to achieve it than what we are used to.
Old 05-07-2008, 12:03 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StevethePilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
Originally Posted by chieftam
An online review by Edmunds, I think, said they were hitting 2000 rpm at 65 in 6th gear, and it dropped even lower in 7th. Only 325 miles so far, but am I not getting into 7th? Other than that, love the vehicle. Thanks for the help.
One thing I do sometimes (well, a lot) is hit the "up-shift" button (for some steering wheels, it's one side to up shift, the other to down shift - on mine it's the outsides of the buttons to up shift, the insides to down shift) while the cruise control is on and I'll usually drop around 100 RPMs (depending on speed). It's like it's not shifting into 7th as soon as I'd like. I thought it was just the GL but the same thing happened on my loaner (the C).

That said, at 65 I'm usually out of gears (it's already in 7th). I think maybe it really is just that the engine has to work a little harder to produce that much power from so small a powerplant.
Old 05-07-2008, 02:01 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Comfy_Couch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL 320 CDI
Originally Posted by chieftam
... but am I not getting into 7th?
Using the steering wheel mounted shift buttons, you can switch to manual mode just to check what gear it's in.
Old 05-07-2008, 02:40 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lkchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 6,075
Received 205 Likes on 182 Posts
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550
Big difference indeed between 3.0 l and 7.3 l.
Old 05-07-2008, 03:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mbslk350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: N. Illinois, USA
Posts: 254
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2021 GLS450, 2015 E250BT 4Matic, 2007 GL320CDI, 2005 SLK350, 2001 SLK320
2000 rpm at 65 mph

My GL320 also runs 2000 rpm at 65 mph.

For comparison, my 3.5L V6 gas-powered SLK350 with the 7-speed tranny runs 2200 rpm at 65 mph.

And my 3.2L V6 gas-powered SLK320 with the 5-speed tranny runs about 2500 rpm at 65 mph.

So the diesel engine revs the lowest of the three. But, like you, I was expecting even lower revs from a diesel engine mated to a 7-speed tranny.
Old 05-07-2008, 07:41 PM
  #7  
Member
 
TV550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
maybe the engines have to reve that high to keep the turbos going so you can have instant on demand torque?
Old 05-07-2008, 09:46 PM
  #8  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
chieftam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 GL320CDI, C6 Corvette, 1969 Corvair Convertible
Thanks for all the information, I guess my vehicle is on par with everyone elses then. I was just concerned as I am usually in the 80 mph range when I travel, although I haven't hit that speed yet due to so few miles on the vehicle, but was just concerned that it might be running 3000 rpm or more at that range, and for 1000 mile trips, it just seemed like alot. I will try using the manual shifters next time I'm on the highway.
Old 05-08-2008, 01:44 AM
  #9  
Newbie
 
dieseldel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Arizona
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dodge 3500 diesel, Jeep Commander
The rpm seems about right for the size of the engine.
My Cummins turns 2250 at 75mph, but its much larger and heavier.
Turbo speed only affected by the exhaust volume/speed, not the engine rpm.

It all seems right to me.
May you have many enjoyable miles.
Old 05-08-2008, 05:09 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Danno4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 GL320 CDI, 2001 TJ Rockcrawler, 2005 Scoobie STI
According to the specifications for the motor, the 3.0 CDI in the GL puts out 398 lb-ft @ 1,600 - 2,800 rpm, so at 2000 RPM that puts it right in the middle of the fat torque curve, which is really the most efficient spot in the engine's operating range, so it makes sense.
Old 05-09-2008, 11:36 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StevethePilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
Originally Posted by Danno4x4
According to the specifications for the motor, the 3.0 CDI in the GL puts out 398 lb-ft @ 1,600 - 2,800 rpm, so at 2000 RPM that puts it right in the middle of the fat torque curve, which is really the most efficient spot in the engine's operating range, so it makes sense.
And again, the award for "Most Knowledgeable About His Car" goes to Danno!
Old 05-22-2008, 08:50 AM
  #12  
Member
 
oinick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of the Mason Dixon, North of the Gulf
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 GL 320 CDI, 2008 M5
Originally Posted by Danno4x4
According to the specifications for the motor, the 3.0 CDI in the GL puts out 398 lb-ft @ 1,600 - 2,800 rpm, so at 2000 RPM that puts it right in the middle of the fat torque curve, which is really the most efficient spot in the engine's operating range, so it makes sense.
It takes a little getting used to, but the transmission does a really great job of keeping the motor in the fat part of the torque curve. Even after a year and a half of driving it, sometimes I still think it's not shifting into the higher gears as it should.

But you've got to love the instantly available torque for passing and towing at highway speeds.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: GL320 Speed vs RPM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.