GL320 Speed vs RPM
#1
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 GL320CDI, C6 Corvette, 1969 Corvair Convertible
GL320 Speed vs RPM
A new GL320CDI owner here with a question. Just got my GL320 after years of Ford Powerstroke diesels. My Powerstrokes would loaf along at about 1750 rpm at 70 mph with 3.73 gears. With a seven speed auto, two overdrives and 3.45 gears, I was suprised to find my MB running at 2000 rpm at 65 mph. I can't seem to find the ratios for the overdrives, but it seems like this is a little high. Is this the normal rpm range? An online review by Edmunds, I think, said they were hitting 2000 rpm at 65 in 6th gear, and it dropped even lower in 7th. Only 325 miles so far, but am I not getting into 7th? Other than that, love the vehicle. Thanks for the help.
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spicewood, TX
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 GL 320, 2007 Silverado LTZ C3500 Duramax Turbo Diesel
A new GL320CDI owner here with a question. Just got my GL320 after years of Ford Powerstroke diesels. My Powerstrokes would loaf along at about 1750 rpm at 70 mph with 3.73 gears. With a seven speed auto, two overdrives and 3.45 gears, I was suprised to find my MB running at 2000 rpm at 65 mph. I can't seem to find the ratios for the overdrives, but it seems like this is a little high. Is this the normal rpm range? An online review by Edmunds, I think, said they were hitting 2000 rpm at 65 in 6th gear, and it dropped even lower in 7th. Only 325 miles so far, but am I not getting into 7th? Other than that, love the vehicle. Thanks for the help.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
That said, at 65 I'm usually out of gears (it's already in 7th). I think maybe it really is just that the engine has to work a little harder to produce that much power from so small a powerplant.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 GL 320 CDI
#6
Senior Member
2000 rpm at 65 mph
My GL320 also runs 2000 rpm at 65 mph.
For comparison, my 3.5L V6 gas-powered SLK350 with the 7-speed tranny runs 2200 rpm at 65 mph.
And my 3.2L V6 gas-powered SLK320 with the 5-speed tranny runs about 2500 rpm at 65 mph.
So the diesel engine revs the lowest of the three. But, like you, I was expecting even lower revs from a diesel engine mated to a 7-speed tranny.
For comparison, my 3.5L V6 gas-powered SLK350 with the 7-speed tranny runs 2200 rpm at 65 mph.
And my 3.2L V6 gas-powered SLK320 with the 5-speed tranny runs about 2500 rpm at 65 mph.
So the diesel engine revs the lowest of the three. But, like you, I was expecting even lower revs from a diesel engine mated to a 7-speed tranny.
Trending Topics
#8
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 GL320CDI, C6 Corvette, 1969 Corvair Convertible
Thanks for all the information, I guess my vehicle is on par with everyone elses then. I was just concerned as I am usually in the 80 mph range when I travel, although I haven't hit that speed yet due to so few miles on the vehicle, but was just concerned that it might be running 3000 rpm or more at that range, and for 1000 mile trips, it just seemed like alot. I will try using the manual shifters next time I'm on the highway.
#9
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Arizona
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dodge 3500 diesel, Jeep Commander
The rpm seems about right for the size of the engine.
My Cummins turns 2250 at 75mph, but its much larger and heavier.
Turbo speed only affected by the exhaust volume/speed, not the engine rpm.
It all seems right to me.
May you have many enjoyable miles.
My Cummins turns 2250 at 75mph, but its much larger and heavier.
Turbo speed only affected by the exhaust volume/speed, not the engine rpm.
It all seems right to me.
May you have many enjoyable miles.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2007 GL320 CDI, 2001 TJ Rockcrawler, 2005 Scoobie STI
According to the specifications for the motor, the 3.0 CDI in the GL puts out 398 lb-ft @ 1,600 - 2,800 rpm, so at 2000 RPM that puts it right in the middle of the fat torque curve, which is really the most efficient spot in the engine's operating range, so it makes sense.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 RX330, 2008 Scion xB, 2001 Honda Insight Hybrid, 2010 Toyot Prius v ATP
According to the specifications for the motor, the 3.0 CDI in the GL puts out 398 lb-ft @ 1,600 - 2,800 rpm, so at 2000 RPM that puts it right in the middle of the fat torque curve, which is really the most efficient spot in the engine's operating range, so it makes sense.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of the Mason Dixon, North of the Gulf
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 GL 320 CDI, 2008 M5
According to the specifications for the motor, the 3.0 CDI in the GL puts out 398 lb-ft @ 1,600 - 2,800 rpm, so at 2000 RPM that puts it right in the middle of the fat torque curve, which is really the most efficient spot in the engine's operating range, so it makes sense.
But you've got to love the instantly available torque for passing and towing at highway speeds.