Oil: 229.51 vs 229.52

For my engine, it says to use the 229.51-rated oil. But what about the 229.52? From what I understand (please correct me if wrong), the 229.52 is specifically developed for engines with DPF filters and helps them to burn/stay cleaner. For example, Mobil 1 ESP 0W-30. Is it worthwhile to use 229.52, or is that maybe for the newer generation DPF's? In other words, is it better to use this oil for my engine, or is it not really necessary?

I called the dealer, and he (honestly) admitted he didn't really know what the difference was between the .51 and .52. The carry the Mobil ESP 0W-30 229.51 -- which is what I was planning on using, anyways.
I'm probably splitting hairs here with the comparison. I know that I'm totally fine using 229.51, really just curious about the 229.52 and if there are any "real" benefits.
EDIT: I just checked Mobil's website. It looks like Mobil 1 ESP 0W-30 now also carries the .52 approval with it now being labelled Mobil 1 ESP X1 0W-30. I don't know how "new" that is and whether that's on shelves, or not. Will find out soon.
Last edited by DennisG01; Feb 22, 2016 at 09:34 AM.

The answer was "No, that's the right stuff. It's the same thing that comes in all the new Mercedes and it's what we put in every diesel we work on". A tech happened to stop by (seemed interested in the conversation) while the parts guy and I were discussing it. I said that, although maybe I'm wrong, it's my understanding that the ESP formula is specifically designed for diesels with certain additives to contain the soot and also to help the DPF burn cleaner. The tech looked at both of us and while he didn't actually say anything, he nodded his head to agree.
The parts guy was very cordial about everything (as was I), but I asked him to show me a document from Mercedes showing that the Fuel Economy version was OK to use. He took some time going through the papers, but stated that he couldn't find any hard evidence to back-up his statement.
I returned the oil, stating that if THEY would be doing the oil change, and then I suffered some engine damage (that could somehow be traced to the wrong oil), that's one thing. But since I'm doing it, it sure would be a lot harder to prove that the wrong oil caused the damage. Granted, it would likely be hard to prove the oil caused the damage anyways. But the type of damage would more likely be a cumulative damage over time.
He said "good point" and happily returned my money. I did keep the (Mann) oil filter as it was only about $2 more than online. Close enough for me and I keep my money local.
If you're still reading this...
I went to three other parts stores in the area and no one carries the ESP. So... Amazon to the rescue! About $49 for a case of 6. Ordered two.

But, yes you did the right thing. You do not want that in your diesel. It will bung up your DPF.
I bought a case of 12 bottles of 0w30 ESP at Monarch Oil for $108CAD.
The dealer here sells the MB branded 229.52 oil. It's $10CAD/liter. I'm sending off oil analysis on each to see which provides better protection in real-world use.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...A2KP3IL9AY5EQ9

My dealer's price was actually pretty good (about $9/qt), just the wrong stuff.
Marc, I'll be very interested to hear the results of your oil analysis. Did you get a baseline analysis, as well?
Trending Topics

I imagine an oil analysis is not going to measure how clean the DPF is staying, though? Also just a guess... the difference from one quality brand of oil to one that is specifically designed for keeping the DPF clean might be negligible?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

It would be worth figuring out if the computer records the values over time.




The exhaust gasses are circulated back in to reduce the combustion temperature, thereby reducing the the production of nitrogen oxides. This in turn causes more soot, thus requiring the DPF.


Only 229.52 is permitted
http://bevo.mercedes-benz.com/d/d/en/Spec_223_2.pdf


http://carinfo.kiev.ua/cars/vin/merc...uster?v=164822

I'm going to continue with the 229.52 spec though, just because it is a higher spec that covers off all the rest, and it is applied retroactively to models prior to its advent.

I'm going to continue with the 229.52 spec though, just because it is a higher spec that covers off all the rest, and it is applied retroactively to models prior to its advent.
You'll note 5W-40 Mobil 1 Formula M is no longer available, replaced by 5W-30 Mobil 1 ESP Formula
The purpose of the replacement is improved fuel economy.
If you want to get this oil cheaper, order Mercedes part number 001 989 37 01 USA6 from a Mercedes dealer selling online, e.g. mbdirectparts.com
I think these paragraphs from Wikipedia explain it ...
CK-4 and FA-4 have been introduced for 2017 model American engines.[13] API CK-4 is backward compatible that means API CK-4 oils are assumed to provide superior performance to oils made to previous categories and could be used without problems in all previous model engines (but see Ford below).
API FA-4 oils are different (that is why API decided to start a new group in addition to API Sx and API Cx). API FA-4 oils are formulated for enhanced fuel economy (presented as reduced greenhouse gas emission). To achieve that, they are SAE xW-30 oils blended to a high temperature high shear viscosity from 2.9 cP to 3.2 cP. They are not suitable for all engines thus their use depends on the decision of each engine manufacturer. They cannot be used with diesel fuel containing more than 15 ppm sulfur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_oil
Bottom line is if 229.51 or 229.52 is not PRINTED ON THE BOTTLE, the oil is not suitable for the OM642.
Things that Fiat Chrysler does are irrelevant to Mercedes.






