Suspension & Rim Size & tire selection – My experience
And they don't do 21" run flats on the GLC43 so I wouldn't know that. I can most definitely state that teeth do not shatter.
And they don't do 21" run flats on the GLC43 so I wouldn't know that. I can most definitely state that teeth do not shatter.
If I go to the fronts at 255/45R20 then there is too much choice to quickly count

The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I've noticed that the GLC Wagon 'normally?' Has run flats. But the GLC Coupe , which has the same 20" rims on front, has normal tyres.... no where on tyre sticker on body does it specify run flats.
MB tech at Mulgrave refused to answer if it was safe or approved in Oz to fit normal tyres to wagon, even though identical rims on Coupe had non run flat tyres. Concerned if I change the comp ins might be void ? Realise if normal tyres fitted I need a spare or goo and air pump as supplied in Coupe. So in Oz, Wagon only has runflats currently and Coupe only has normal tyres.
Any suggestions or comment. Anyone running wagon with normal tyres. Might give better ride. Thanks
Last edited by Teckno; Feb 17, 2017 at 05:38 PM. Reason: Typing error
I've noticed that the GLC Wagon 'normally?' Has run flats. But the GLC Coupe , which has the same 20" rims on front, has normal tyres.... no where on tyre sticker on body does it specify run flats.
MB tech at Mulgrave refused to answer if it was safe or approved in Oz to fit normal tyres to wagon, even though identical rims on Coupe had non run flat tyres. Concerned if I change the comp ins might be void ? Realise if normal tyres fitted I need a spare or goo and air pump as supplied in Coupe. So in Oz, Wagon only has runflats currently and Coupe only has normal tyres.
Any suggestions or comment. Anyone running wagon with normal tyres. Might give better ride. Thanks
I really have only one complaint about my 20" Pirelli RFT combined with springs, and that is crashing into potholes. I have test driven (briefly) an AMG43 with 21" non-RFT and I can confirm that it doesn't seem to crash into potholes. That is, you hear the car hit the hole, but you don't really feel it.
That's what I want. What's the cheapest way of getting it? Would 20" non-RFT be sufficient? Would 19" non-RFT be better, at the cost of five new rims & tyres? (I always carry a spare when out of town, even with RFT.) Or do I really need to changeover to a GLC with the air option, however named? That's still the outstanding question for me.
I really have only one complaint about my 20" Pirelli RFT combined with springs, and that is crashing into potholes. I have test driven (briefly) an AMG43 with 21" non-RFT and I can confirm that it doesn't seem to crash into potholes. That is, you hear the car hit the hole, but you don't really feel it.
That's what I want. What's the cheapest way of getting it? Would 20" non-RFT be sufficient? Would 19" non-RFT be better, at the cost of five new rims & tyres? (I always carry a spare when out of town, even with RFT.) Or do I really need to changeover to a GLC with the air option, however named? That's still the outstanding question for me.
What I've having difficult in getting a precise picture of is the how far you can get just with tyres and wheel size, and how much more of a difference would air make. Upgrading cars is a fairly drastic option for me, and the other part-owner would take some convincing.
However in my opinion the 21" with air body control is super comfortable. I had a chap come over last Thursday who wanted to experience the crabbing/juddering issue. He couldn't believe how comfortable 21" on air body control is compared to his q5 on 19" springs.
But it all depends on perspective, if you are after that old fashioned American floaty suspension, none of them do that in any configuration. It is definitely a European, German, car.
Coming home took a little adjustment as our roads are not that smooth, and as you say, the up-market European marques do aim for the firm and sporty style of ride. Even with air, it ain't no hovercraft.
But crashing into potholes is not good enough for what is in all other respects a luxury car.
Coming home took a little adjustment as our roads are not that smooth, and as you say, the up-market European marques do aim for the firm and sporty style of ride. Even with air, it ain't no hovercraft.
But crashing into potholes is not good enough for what is in all other respects a luxury car.
To be fair - the interest is not a good place if this is really important to you. The only way to know is test drive the varying configuration on roads that you know. We all have different reference frameworks as to what is good.
The first thing I noticed as I drove away from the dealer wast how different the suspensión is from my GLC 250D with airbody control + 19" non-runflat. Very noticeable. Much stiffer. Only have driven it in ECO with COMFORT suspensión mode so fart (15km). I am glad I sticked to the 19" non-runflat.
AS I said in my previous posts about this I enjoy performance driving (I do not race on the roads) but appreciate a comfortable ride in long highway trips.
I have exactly that combination - 21" run flats on a GLC43 - even on potholed California roads the ride is smooth
i wouldn't switch out my wheels for anything - they're the most striking and visually appealing feature.
We've been lucky to only have one tire eaten by a pothole this year but they are still hungry
Speed hardly even matters when the holes run all the way down through the road bed.
The mistake people make is asking someone else's opinion on a car's ride when they have no idea where they're coming from or their personal preferences. The one and only way to get a reliable answer is to go to the dealership and drive it yourself.



