Sport exhaust volume on cold start
it is not really a problem but I leave for work around 7 when some of my neighbors are still asleep.
Anyone else see this before I go in for Service A next week?




it is not really a problem but I leave for work around 7 when some of my neighbors are still asleep.
Anyone else see this before I go in for Service A next week?




Would sorta make sense that it's trying to make sure it gets all of the highly-oxygenated gasses completely out of the exhaust system, since that's what a lot of cars do on cold starts via some kind of injection pump. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong in the case of our specific cars, though.
Would sorta make sense that it's trying to make sure it gets all of the highly-oxygenated gasses completely out of the exhaust system, since that's what a lot of cars do on cold starts via some kind of injection pump. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong in the case of our specific cars, though.
Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG








It looks like numbers from the driver's door post, which aren't the recommended tire pressures. Which aren't the recommended inflation pressures.
The gas flap gives the recommended tire pressure.
I usually end up plus one or plus two over the gas flap pressures.
It looks like numbers from the driver's door post, which aren't the recommended tire pressures. Which aren't the recommended inflation pressures.
The gas flap gives the recommended tire pressure.
I usually end up plus one or plus two over the gas flap pressures.




However, after 5,000 miles, I saw excessive middle wear on the rears (>1/32), and backed off to 37/34. A slight change in feel, rear seems to contribute more to balance, so I'm still there. Wear evened out.
The 164/166 seemed to like the additional rear roll stiffness - with higher rear pressures.
But one of the things I like about the 167 is it's better balance and better involvement of the front end. Better overall balance.
However, after 5,000 miles, I saw excessive middle wear on the rears (>1/32), and backed off to 37/34. A slight change in feel, rear seems to contribute more to balance, so I'm still there. Wear evened out.
The 164/166 seemed to like the additional rear roll stiffness - with higher rear pressures.
But one of the things I like about the 167 is it's better balance and better involvement of the front end. Better overall balance.
Assume you are running the 22" setup?




Assume you are running the 22" setup?





