Nuieve

Visited dealership today re: whine. They confirmed transmission problem. They didn't tell me exactly what they think the problem is, but it's definitely looking to be a major repair.

We had the car for 2 weeks only. Didn't even get the license plates yet.

ble2716

If it is a transmission problem then you should be happy because it's still cover under warranty.
It's bad to see the transmission goes but worst if you have to pay for it.

MBRedux

What????? This new and the tranny falters? Get out of the car and demand another!

ble2716

I could be wrong, but I thought his GLK is a 2010 model.

MBRedux

You're right! Too many with same issue on this thread. In any case, I still would get out of it if I could. Smells (& sounds) like a lemon!

Nuieve

We wouldn't buy a MB without warranty. We have extended warranty (7years/135k miles so we're good for the next 4 years or so)

And yes, the transmission will be replaced next week.

I'm not even slightly upset. I actually find it quite amusing. Owned a new car for two whole weeks before it went caboom.

ble2716

Like I said.
It's too bad too bad to see the transmission goes too early.
But don't give up just yet as many of us, GLK owners, have found the car is pretty reliable.... compare to other MB models.
My car's warranty will be out next year too.
I think I'll looking into buying extended warranty too.

Nuieve

We will get rid of it before warranty runs out (and this was decided before we bought it, tranny has nothing to do with it).

I had my last CLK 1.5 years beyond warranty. I didn't have to do any repairs, but it did give me quite a few "is my pocket about to get $2000 lighter moments?" moments... Worries like that take a lot out of enjoyment of car ownership. Even if you don't get to use that warranty, just piece of mind alone is worth it.