New GLK?
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
2007 C280 4Matic - Iridium Silver
New GLK?
Hello - I currently own a 2007 C280 4Matic that has approximately 65,000 miles on it and am looking to possibly trade it in for a new 2013 GLK. Has anyone else made the switch from a C Class to the GLK? If so, have you been happy with the switch?
In addition, has anyone used the USAA Car Buying Service? I'd be interested in hearing both positive and negative experiences using this service. Thank you....
In addition, has anyone used the USAA Car Buying Service? I'd be interested in hearing both positive and negative experiences using this service. Thank you....
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: NYC
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
I didn't exactly switch from a C to a GLK but I do own both and came from an '05 ML500 to the GLK and I'm very happy so far, no the GLK can't tow or haul as much as my ML but it still moves around a lot of stuff but more importantly to me I really enjoy the ride/handling of the smaller GLK and the fuel economy improvement is a plus too. Compared to my C, most times the GLK is the vehicle of choice to get things done and the C is there only to put a smile on my face lol
I'd go for it
I'd go for it
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 356
Likes: 33
From: NYC
glk
I didn't exactly switch from a C to a GLK but I do own both and came from an '05 ML500 to the GLK and I'm very happy so far, no the GLK can't tow or haul as much as my ML but it still moves around a lot of stuff but more importantly to me I really enjoy the ride/handling of the smaller GLK and the fuel economy improvement is a plus too. Compared to my C, most times the GLK is the vehicle of choice to get things done and the C is there only to put a smile on my face lol
I'd go for it
I'd go for it
Have some questions comparing the C and GLK
- do you feel safer when driving the GLK over the C?
- does driving the GLK feel much different to the C (getting into parking spaces, driving in city etc)
Since the GLK is 'based' on the C, I wonder if its just feels like a 'taller' C?
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 15
From: Boston and SWFlorida
2025 GLC300 white, 2023 Taycan RWD black
I traded a 2010 C300 4Matic for my GLK. The difference is night and day. Although I know that the new C has a more upgraded interior than mine did, the GLK seems even more high quality. The GLK ride is more solid. With the larger engine there is more power than I had in the C and the GLK has better fuel economy. The car is not as sporting but the ride is more comfortable in the GLK and there is greater utility in the GLK. The GLK is actually a few inches shorter than the C300 so it is easier to park.
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
C250w
I did the exact same thing Boylston trading my 2010 C300 for the 250 bluetec GLK and now after one month I haven't looked back. By the way fuel mileage gets better after the initial break-in period. Higher quality finish on the vehicle than my C300, smooth ride and pretty quiet for twin turbo diesel.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: NYC
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
I can't say The GLK feels safer than the C, they both feel very secure and safe to me. I feel the GLK is easier to maneuver than the C, but then the C63 is almost 5" longer than a standard C so my GLK is almost 8" shorter than my C. I also have the multimedia package in the GLK so the camera helps a lot. To me the GLK has its own feel, not like a taller C.
I don't think you can go wrong with either vehicle, just depends on what your needs are. I'm very happy with both for totally different reasons
I don't think you can go wrong with either vehicle, just depends on what your needs are. I'm very happy with both for totally different reasons
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 356
Likes: 33
From: NYC
glk
I can't say The GLK feels safer than the C, they both feel very secure and safe to me. I feel the GLK is easier to maneuver than the C, but then the C63 is almost 5" longer than a standard C so my GLK is almost 8" shorter than my C. I also have the multimedia package in the GLK so the camera helps a lot. To me the GLK has its own feel, not like a taller C.
I don't think you can go wrong with either vehicle, just depends on what your needs are. I'm very happy with both for totally different reasons
I don't think you can go wrong with either vehicle, just depends on what your needs are. I'm very happy with both for totally different reasons
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
2013 GLK250BT
My switch was B200 to GLK250BT. It's a night - day difference.
While waiting for GLK to arrive (B200 was a trade in), I was given 2012 GLK350 to use.
Once I got GLK250BT... oh, what a difference (-2012 GLK350 owners - no hard feelings) but GLK250BT is quite different.
I have driven C class as well. I'd say comparable, although I prefer higher seating position in GLK and SUV feeling.
While waiting for GLK to arrive (B200 was a trade in), I was given 2012 GLK350 to use.
Once I got GLK250BT... oh, what a difference (-2012 GLK350 owners - no hard feelings) but GLK250BT is quite different.
I have driven C class as well. I'd say comparable, although I prefer higher seating position in GLK and SUV feeling.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: NYC
2015 E63S AMG & 2013 GLK350
Now my current recommendation is Mercedes of Massapequa, so far they have been great in bth sales and service, purchased both my current cars through them with Hank Woloz and he was great to deal with. IMHO they are worth the trip.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 11
From: Gulf Coast but not Florida
GLK350, SL63 AMG
Purchase Metro area
We had good luck with MB Danbury. No service yet, but did have a positive experience there with a previous MB model.
If you decide to buy from them, I would go right to the sales director (avoid a salesperson) after you get 2 or three bids from other dealers.
If you decide to buy from them, I would go right to the sales director (avoid a salesperson) after you get 2 or three bids from other dealers.
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 193
Likes: 4
From: Denver
2014 CLS550 4Matic; 2010 E550, 2007 SL550
Howdy,
I traded a 2011 C300 4Matic for a 2013 GLK350. The primary reasons were C300 riding too low for deep snow and ice, plus the passenger seat geometry didn't work for my wife.
The turning circle and maneuverability are the same or better. Cross-visibility is better as you're sitting taller. Side visibility is a little less as the vehicle is taller, but the mirror are bigger so it works out.
Comfort is better. The GLK drives like a taller C300 (which is exactly what it is), but it doesn't feel big or tall. The rear seats are actually better, as the taller seats leave more legroom, and it's easier to get in and out.
The direct injected engine and Eco in the 2013 GLK actually gave me better economy that the C300, except for high-speed highway drives (engineering tricks can't fix aerodynamics). 70mph on the highway gives me 28-30mpg with the GLK, it gave 34-38ish in the C300.
Interior noise levels are about the same, as long as you keep the cargo/tonneau cover in the back closed. When it's open, you hear more road noise from the back.
I've never regretted the change. As much as I loved the C300, I've have not found myself wishing I hadn't traded for the GLK. It's big enough to be very flexible, small enough to be economical and fun to drive.
Brought home a Troy-Bilt snowblower in the back, went for a drive in the mountains that weekend.
I traded a 2011 C300 4Matic for a 2013 GLK350. The primary reasons were C300 riding too low for deep snow and ice, plus the passenger seat geometry didn't work for my wife.
The turning circle and maneuverability are the same or better. Cross-visibility is better as you're sitting taller. Side visibility is a little less as the vehicle is taller, but the mirror are bigger so it works out.
Comfort is better. The GLK drives like a taller C300 (which is exactly what it is), but it doesn't feel big or tall. The rear seats are actually better, as the taller seats leave more legroom, and it's easier to get in and out.
The direct injected engine and Eco in the 2013 GLK actually gave me better economy that the C300, except for high-speed highway drives (engineering tricks can't fix aerodynamics). 70mph on the highway gives me 28-30mpg with the GLK, it gave 34-38ish in the C300.
Interior noise levels are about the same, as long as you keep the cargo/tonneau cover in the back closed. When it's open, you hear more road noise from the back.
I've never regretted the change. As much as I loved the C300, I've have not found myself wishing I hadn't traded for the GLK. It's big enough to be very flexible, small enough to be economical and fun to drive.
Brought home a Troy-Bilt snowblower in the back, went for a drive in the mountains that weekend.
