GLS Class (X167) Produced 2020 to present

Standard Wheel/Tire Size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-11-2024, 09:59 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wyatt88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
GLS 450
Standard Wheel/Tire Size

Hello All, coming from a 2018 GLS with the standard 19" wheels, I now have a 2024 GLS with the standard 21" staggered wheel setup. My question to those in the know, what are the advantages to having larger wheels, other than looks, which are important? Also what is the advantage of having the very wide rear wheels? I have heard narrower wheels/tires perform better in snow/wet conditions.

I live in a metro area where our tax money goes to anything but road maintenance. I have to say that my 2018 with the smaller and narrower wheels road the city potholes and huge pavement seams like a champ. The 2024 with the standard setup crashes over these pavement imperfections even with the air suspension.

My only other complaint about the 2024 compared to the 2018 is the wimpy steering wheel heat and the capacitive buttons on the steering wheel which randomly escalate the music when a turn a corner.

Thanks for any responses.
Old 03-11-2024, 10:55 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
EWL5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 762
Received 185 Likes on 148 Posts
'23 GLS450
Originally Posted by wyatt88
My only other complaint about the 2024 compared to the 2018 is the wimpy steering wheel heat and the capacitive buttons on the steering wheel which randomly escalate the music when a turn a corner.

Thanks for any responses.
I don't have an answer for your wheel/tire question (sorry!). Just curious if the music volume changes because your hand brushes the capacitive buttons or something else?
The following users liked this post:
wyatt88 (03-12-2024)
Old 03-11-2024, 11:32 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
z28lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 604
Received 173 Likes on 110 Posts
C450, GLS 63 and a few other things
Larger wheels are primarily for looks as you mentioned. However, large/wide tires (particularly with the associated low profile/stiff sidewalls) will provide for better dry traction and handling (and the expense of comfort). Not surprisingly, those wide tires help with many of the tests that automotive journalists use in their testing including 0-60 times, braking distances and lateral handling with g's or figure 8 tests, which are important to some manufacturers.

The following 3 users liked this post by z28lt1:
EWL5 (03-11-2024), Splaktar (03-12-2024), wyatt88 (03-12-2024)
Old 03-12-2024, 01:09 AM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wyatt88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
GLS 450
Thanks z28lt1 for the explanation and taking time to reply. Personally any increased performance is not worth the harsh ride on lousy pavement, but I am sure others may disagree.

Last edited by wyatt88; 03-12-2024 at 01:16 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Eraser-X (03-12-2024)
Old 03-12-2024, 01:15 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wyatt88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
GLS 450
EWL5, I am sure that the volume level change that happens seemingly randomly is because of my technique of somehow brushing against the capacitive volume steering wheel button when turning. My sixteen year old son, who is in driver's training, points out my outdated hand position on the steering wheel among my many other driving 'faults'.

Thanks!

Last edited by wyatt88; 03-12-2024 at 01:17 AM.
The following users liked this post:
EWL5 (03-12-2024)
Old 03-12-2024, 07:25 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Scott Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 73
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
GLS 450 (2022)
On my 2022 GLS my hand has in the past brushed the RESUME toggle switch on the steering wheel while turning into a parking space, and the car immediately tries to accelerate back to 50 MPH. So that's a lot of fun when it happens!
The following users liked this post:
wyatt88 (03-12-2024)
Old 03-12-2024, 08:19 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
streborx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,994
Received 956 Likes on 732 Posts
G550
Regarding the OP topic, 21" (or larger) wheels are primarily for looks that you and maybe 2 or 3 other people will notice. The price for all this attention and admiration is dismal tire selection, high prices, poor availability, compromised ride comfort, and risk of pothole damage. Staggered setups, that rule out tire rotation, make even less sense with an even smaller choice in tires, and especially in winter tires. But being on the back-order wait list for a set of snow tires in mid- February makes some folks feel special, I guess. My BMW came equipped with a 22" staggered setup (even worse, performance summer rated run-flats), and the first modification I made was changing them out to a squared-up set of 20" wheels with Michelin CC2s. I don't care what others think of 20" wheels, and my doctor tells me my testosterone level hasn't been compromised.
The following 3 users liked this post by streborx:
EWL5 (03-12-2024), Splaktar (03-12-2024), wyatt88 (03-12-2024)
Old 03-12-2024, 03:05 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mikapen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,769
Received 1,589 Likes on 1,169 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
Originally Posted by streborx
Regarding the OP topic, 21" (or larger) wheels are primarily for looks that you and maybe 2 or 3 other people will notice. The price for all this attention and admiration is dismal tire selection, high prices, poor availability, compromised ride comfort, and risk of pothole damage. Staggered setups, that rule out tire rotation, make even less sense with an even smaller choice in tires, and especially in winter tires. But being on the back-order wait list for a set of snow tires in mid- February makes some folks feel special, I guess. My BMW came equipped with a 22" staggered setup (even worse, performance summer rated run-flats), and the first modification I made was changing them out to a squared-up set of 20" wheels with Michelin CC2s. I don't care what others think of 20" wheels, and my doctor tells me my testosterone level hasn't been compromised.
I agree that staggered tires are for looks, since my 53 needs more front grip, but I disagree that big, grippy tires are for appearance only.

Tires are what provides that performance.

Sorry about your manhood concerns, but don't buy a performance car if you don't want performance!

Get a car with little tires, that are always in stock at Walmart for under $99.
It'll be a better match for your sensitivities, at least based on your post.
Old 03-12-2024, 06:02 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
streborx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,994
Received 956 Likes on 732 Posts
G550
Originally Posted by mikapen
I agree that staggered tires are for looks, since my 53 needs more front grip, but I disagree that big, grippy tires are for appearance only.

Tires are what provides that performance.

Sorry about your manhood concerns, but don't buy a performance car if you don't want performance!

Get a car with little tires, that are always in stock at Walmart for under $99.
It'll be a better match for your sensitivities, at least based on your post.
Agreed - when tire performance counts, big grippy tires are the way to go. But my BMW X7 is considered an upscale soccer-mom ride in some circles, even with its 4.4L TT 523 hp and increased top speed limiter. Performance tires on it seems to be like trying to make it respectable if I try to elbow my way into a Ferrari rally (lol).
Old 03-13-2024, 08:20 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
jkaetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 274
Received 108 Likes on 74 Posts
2021 GLS580 | 2011 ML350 BlueTec | 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP
Originally Posted by streborx
Agreed - when tire performance counts, big grippy tires are the way to go. But my BMW X7 is considered an upscale soccer-mom ride in some circles, even with its 4.4L TT 523 hp and increased top speed limiter. Performance tires on it seems to be like trying to make it respectable if I try to elbow my way into a Ferrari rally (lol).
Can't speak for the X7 but I appreciate that the GLS feels more like a car than a massive people mover. After ~5 months of ownership I only recently found its front grip limit on a wet roundabout. It absolutely provides more performance than needed but I appreciate the 21x10 front and 21x11 wheels. I'd certainly take the extra 1/2" of sidewall if offered but I don't see it making a massive difference. I do agree that going above 21 gives diminishing returns and a more limited tire selection but I suspect this will change as time goes on. There seems to be a never ending push to increase wheel sizes from all manufacturers. My guess is the larger wheel/tire combinations allow less rolling resistance ever so slightly increasing their CAFE ratings when multiplied by thousands of vehicles sold.
Old 03-13-2024, 10:38 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wildta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,671
Received 616 Likes on 455 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by jkaetz
There seems to be a never ending push to increase wheel sizes from all manufacturers. My guess is the larger wheel/tire combinations allow less rolling resistance ever so slightly increasing their CAFE ratings when multiplied by thousands of vehicles sold.
I always thought that rotational mass (like increasing tire/wheel size which typically adds to the unsprung weight), is known to reduce your gas mileage. Also because a larger tire typically might be wider as well and thus has more contact with the ground, it would have a higher rolling resistance.
Old 03-13-2024, 10:47 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
streborx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,994
Received 956 Likes on 732 Posts
G550
Originally Posted by jkaetz
Can't speak for the X7 but I appreciate that the GLS feels more like a car than a massive people mover. After ~5 months of ownership I only recently found its front grip limit on a wet roundabout. It absolutely provides more performance than needed but I appreciate the 21x10 front and 21x11 wheels. I'd certainly take the extra 1/2" of sidewall if offered but I don't see it making a massive difference. I do agree that going above 21 gives diminishing returns and a more limited tire selection but I suspect this will change as time goes on. There seems to be a never ending push to increase wheel sizes from all manufacturers. My guess is the larger wheel/tire combinations allow less rolling resistance ever so slightly increasing their CAFE ratings when multiplied by thousands of vehicles sold.
The OE tires on my X7 were performance grade, optimum for dry pavement. Tread design and rubber compound are the critical factors in rain, snow and mud. The skinny 205 Blizzaks on my Jeep will push a plow loaded with snow uphill. The X7's 305's excel at spinning in place on a flat surface. Contrary to some beliefs, traction control cannot turn tires into something they're not.
Old 03-13-2024, 11:09 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
streborx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,994
Received 956 Likes on 732 Posts
G550
Originally Posted by wildta
I always thought that rotational mass (like increasing tire/wheel size which typically adds to the unsprung weight), is known to reduce your gas mileage. Also because a larger tire typically might be wider as well and thus has more contact with the ground, it would have a higher rolling resistance.
Maybe in combination with mild hybrid systems there is some beneficial flywheel effect. How much is real and how much is imputed is anyone's guess.
Old 03-13-2024, 02:04 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
jkaetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 274
Received 108 Likes on 74 Posts
2021 GLS580 | 2011 ML350 BlueTec | 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP
Originally Posted by streborx
Maybe in combination with mild hybrid systems there is some beneficial flywheel effect. How much is real and how much is imputed is anyone's guess.
This is kind of what I was thinking. More weight yes, but once it's moving the impact is negligible and the larger overall diameter will more easily roll over the road surface. We'd likely need an engineer to do the math for us and tell us if there's any statistical relevance or if it is just for marketing and looks.
Old 03-14-2024, 12:04 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
DesertGolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
2020 GLS 450
Originally Posted by wyatt88
Hello All, coming from a 2018 GLS with the standard 19" wheels, I now have a 2024 GLS with the standard 21" staggered wheel setup. My question to those in the know, what are the advantages to having larger wheels, other than looks, which are important? Also what is the advantage of having the very wide rear wheels? I have heard narrower wheels/tires perform better in snow/wet conditions.

I live in a metro area where our tax money goes to anything but road maintenance. I have to say that my 2018 with the smaller and narrower wheels road the city potholes and huge pavement seams like a champ. The 2024 with the standard setup crashes over these pavement imperfections even with the air suspension.

My only other complaint about the 2024 compared to the 2018 is the wimpy steering wheel heat and the capacitive buttons on the steering wheel which randomly escalate the music when a turn a corner.

Thanks for any responses.
I traded a 2020 GLS with standard 20" wheels and NON-runflat tires for a 2024 GLS with standard staggered 21" wheels with NON-runflat tires. While I don't sense much change in ride quality, the 2024 has greater directional stability due to the wider rear tires. The 2024 feels significantly better connected to the pavement.

What air pressure are you running with the front and rear tires?

Old 03-16-2024, 10:22 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nc211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,074
Received 647 Likes on 402 Posts
2014 E350 4-matic Sport & 2020 GLS450
We have the 21's staggered on our 2020. Definitely holds that rear end in place, which in a big SUV like this, is why I tolerate the $750 kick to the wallet every 25k miles to replace them.

What I don't like is the alignment MB puts on them, too kicked in towards each other, which I get it, adds to the stability factor. However when one wheel goes over say a lane stripe that is slick, the other immediately wants to push the rear over, causes a wiggle in the rear and throughout the car. Always has done that, even after a few checks of the alignment from the dealer and my Indi. I would much prefer the tire width be the stability factor only and less alignment influence.
Old 03-16-2024, 10:26 AM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
wyatt88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
GLS 450
Originally Posted by DesertGolfer
I traded a 2020 GLS with standard 20" wheels and NON-runflat tires for a 2024 GLS with standard staggered 21" wheels with NON-runflat tires. While I don't sense much change in ride quality, the 2024 has greater directional stability due to the wider rear tires. The 2024 feels significantly better connected to the pavement.

What air pressure are you running with the front and rear tires?

Tires at 33. Is there a better number? Thanks.
Old 03-16-2024, 10:35 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nc211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,074
Received 647 Likes on 402 Posts
2014 E350 4-matic Sport & 2020 GLS450
Originally Posted by wyatt88
Tires at 33. Is there a better number? Thanks.
That's what we've always run ours at too. Not sure what brand you have on yours? Our originally came with the Pirelli tires and switched over to the Michelins at 25k all around (I like Michelin better in general, personal preference).
Old 03-17-2024, 07:32 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
DesertGolfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
2020 GLS 450
My tires are also set to 33 PSI, which is just 2 PSI above the recommended pressure (displayed inside the fuel door). I find that 33 PSI provides good ride quality with decent steering response.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Standard Wheel/Tire Size



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.