When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So time is nearly up on my Mercedes Me initial trial. I stand to lose, among other things, remote engine start.
Anyone else pissed that "remote start" is listed under Standard Equipment in the Order Guide and yet we have to pay for it as a subscription?!!!
I've checked Order Guides from MY20 to MY25 and the pic below is fairly deceptive!
I personally don't see anything wrong with it except that I wish the subscription fee was a passthrough cost instead of another lucrative revenue stream, unless they put it straight back into R&D, or they go back to the a la carte method of paying.
Other items listed as standard equipment but we all know a subscription is required:
Your mobile phone has a cellular radio standard, but you must pay a monthly service fee to use it. Remote Start functionality is standard, but the data connection and the operating costs of the servers to use the feature need to be paid for on an ongoing basis. It's not a one time cost. BTW, you also need a smartphone to use Remote Start along with data service from your carrier. That's not included in the price of the car, either.
Last edited by superswiss; 05-30-2024 at 01:57 AM.
Mercedes is not a non-profit charity. Why would they sell something with 0% margin? Guessing you don't own a business yourself.
Yes of course it's a business opportunity. Just wishful thinking out loud, whenever a subscription fee topic comes up I start to think about all the subscriptions I currently have that all add up, anyway you can disregard the comment. Just silly wishful thinking of a perfectly competitive economic market.
I lived without Remote start forever.
Then early 2000's manufacturers put it on the key FOB - ok that is cool but why do I need it?
To start cooling or heating my car before I get in?
Is that not a waste of Gas or diesel or Battery power which then is against all this global warming issue?
Dangerous, easier to steal car? something else to break or prevent car from starting normally?
yeah its cool, but I have not had a car with it nor do I care if I have it a I doubt I would use it.
Daughter in-law has it and tries to explain how great it is... I just tell her park in a garage and shut the door and no need.
But if you did park in garage and crank it up while not being there - could that not be dangerous?
Carbon monoxide comes to mind leaking into house or room above garage...
I dunno If I had to pay a subscription for it - I would pass - but I am a cheap-old-*******.
I am sick of this Nickle and Dime and tip for everything world we now live in.
IF they make you pay subscription for remote start that is on a key FOB that would suck worse.
IMO they should have the subscription based "standard" features broken out/identified very clearly in sales material as they're useless and add no value if you don't pay for the subscription. Remote start is also unique as most manufacturers implement it from the key fob and not though a subscription app so I will agree with the OP on the deceptiveness of claiming it's "standard" while requiring a subscription.
Personally I find very little value in Mercedes Me. It allows us to remote lock/unlock, remote start, and a bunch of status things. IMO the list of things it won't do but would add value:
Keep the engine and climate control running when doors are opened during remote start
Control the climate control settings during remote start
Control the heated/cooled seats during remote start
Control the sunroof and windows, it screams about them being open, but doesn't allow you to close them.
Control the trunk (Yes you can unlock and then someone can open the trunk but there's no reason it couldn't be controlled directly.)
Allow a paired and unlocked phone to act as a key fob
Pull strait into or out of a parking spot (Likely needs DAP and the 360 cameras as well to make this safe)
View the cameras remotely
View DTC codes and Mercedes descriptions that go with them
I understand remote start is a subscription model NOW but it is quite deceptive to include it under "Standard Features", especially when it wasn't always this way (my prior Mercedes was a MY16 GL450).
If you look at the main competitor X7, remote start is truly standard and has been this way since at least MY22 (possibly earlier): https://www.bmwofcolumbia.com/bmw-x7-safety-technology/
My X3 has remote start because it was a permanent paid option. The issue is I don't even have that as a permanent option (keyfob enabled) on the GLS, Mercedes' top SUV no less!
Maybe Millennials and Gen Z are used to this but I for one think it's quite tacky for German luxury. Don't even get me started on their "unlocking more hosrepower" subscription model for their EVs!
I personally don't see anything wrong with it except that I wish the subscription fee was a passthrough cost instead of another lucrative revenue stream, unless they put it straight back into R&D, or they go back to the a la carte method of paying.
Other items listed as standard equipment but we all know a subscription is required:
Sirius XM
Hermes Cellular Communication Module
Originally Posted by superswiss
Your mobile phone has a cellular radio standard, but you must pay a monthly service fee to use it. Remote Start functionality is standard, but the data connection and the operating costs of the servers to use the feature need to be paid for on an ongoing basis. It's not a one time cost. BTW, you also need a smartphone to use Remote Start along with data service from your carrier. That's not included in the price of the car, either.
Apple Carplay and Android Auto don't have a disclaimer that says "requires an appropriate smartphone and cellular service". Why? Because this is understood and has been since they've been in cars!
Not the same for "remote start". It hasn't always been a feature of an app but rather a physical button on the keyfob as I mentioned before. To make the switch and not mention this "minor" change to a subscription model in the Order Guide for new customers and owners w/older Mercedes is a bit egregious, no?
For folks cross-shopping an X7 and GLS, they'd think the remote start feature is equitable when clearly it's not!
Bringing the point home, here's a list of my expiring services:
Remote Vehicle Finder Theft Notification and Parking Damage Detection Car-to-X Communication Valet Protect Parking for Navigation Weather forecast Online Map Update Personalization Vehicle Locator Geofencing Vehicle Tracker Weather map Remote Engine Start Local Search Live Traffic Information Remote Door Lock & Unlock
Mercedes was a bit sneaky mixing a permanent feature "MB Navigation" w/future subs "Live Traffic" and "Map Updates" in the Order Guide.
Aside from that, clearly "Remote Engine Start" should not be in the Order Guide under Standard Features if nothing else above in my expiring service list is!
Allow a paired and unlocked phone to act as a key fob
View the cameras remotely
I have the paid "Digital Key" option on my X3 and can make my iPhone or my Apple Watch a key. It comes in handy on occasion, especially when switching cars out of the house and you didn't bring the other key!
I can also "spy" on the surroundings near my X3 using the app since I have the surround cameras. Helps you remember where you parked or see if the situation has changed around you since you parked.
Apple Carplay and Android Auto don't have a disclaimer that says "requires an appropriate smartphone and cellular service". Why? Because this is understood and has been since they've been in cars!
Not the same for "remote start". It hasn't always been a feature of an app but rather a physical button on the keyfob as I mentioned before. To make the switch and not mention this "minor" change to a subscription model in the Order Guide for new customers and owners w/older Mercedes is a bit egregious, no?
For folks cross-shopping an X7 and GLS, they'd think the remote start feature is equitable when clearly it's not!
Sneaky.
What's more, there is even an EPA fuel economy rating without the disclaimer that you have to put fuel in it to run the car.😧
What's wrong with Mercedes these days. Misleading people about needing gasoline.....
The salesman never said it needed gasoline to go places either. I am really pissed. 😡
I've even heard that they charge for the gasoline they put in the car if you run out on the highway and call Mercedes for Roadside assistance.
All this without a disclaimer. My world is ending.💀
What's more, there is even an EPA fuel economy rating without the disclaimer that you have to put fuel in it to run the car.😧
What's wrong with Mercedes these days. Misleading people about needing gasoline.....
The salesman never said it needed gasoline to go places either. I am really pissed. 😡
I've even heard that they charge for the gasoline they put in the car if you run out on the highway and call Mercedes for Roadside assistance.
All this without a disclaimer. My world is ending.💀
BTW NAV works without live traffic.
Very funny!
When Mercedes is interested in making luxury cars again, let me know!
This really pissed me off, but it's not the worst. I tried to use the monthly subscription for remote start over the winter when I use it. Unfortunately the app inexplicably has the monthly option grayed out leaving only the annual subscription. 4 calls to Mercedes later and hours wasted and they have no idea why and no means to figure it out, even when talking to app support. Thanks MB! I spent a 100k and my kids ride to school in frozen car seats.
It's interesting what the different manufacturers offer. The MDXs I had, as well as the 2022 Honda Ridgeline truck I recently purchased, have remote start on the key fob. Plus, the Ridgeline also has a compartment for my sunglasses!
It's interesting what the different manufacturers offer. The MDXs I had, as well as the 2022 Honda Ridgeline truck I recently purchased, have remote start on the key fob. Plus, the Ridgeline also has a compartment for my sunglasses!
At least w/BMW and Acura, you can have remote start be part of the keyfob functionality. No such luck on Mercedes!
I wouldn't put it past Mercedes to charge (via monthly subscription) for heated seats/steering wheel, A/C, and third row folding/unfolding in the not too far future!
At least w/BMW and Acura, you can have remote start be part of the keyfob functionality. No such luck on Mercedes!
I wouldn't put it past Mercedes to charge (via monthly subscription) for heated seats/steering wheel, A/C, and third row folding/unfolding in the not too far future!
BMW already tried charging a monthly subscription fee for heated seats but ended up dropping it due to the unsurprising backlash. Let's be clear. All car manufacturers are exploring alternative revenue streams. Audi charges a subscription fee for their matrix headlights and other things for example. The only upside to this is that it lets used car buyers add additional options that the original buyer didn't purchase.
BMW already tried charging a monthly subscription fee for heated seats but ended up dropping it due to the unsurprising backlash. Let's be clear. All car manufacturers are exploring alternative revenue streams. Audi charges a subscription fee for their matrix headlights and other things for example. The only upside to this is that it lets used car buyers add additional options that the original buyer didn't purchase.
So nobody sees the downside of the first owner paying for hardware they will never use?!!!
Who said the first owner pays for the hardware? They don't pay for the hardware, reducing the initial purchase price, and instead the manufacturer banks on recouping the cost of installing the hardware via future subscriptions. This actually lowers the production costs, because the manufacturer doesn't have to account for different hardware configurations. Instead they build all the cars the same and then unlock features based on what the buyer decides to subscribe to.
Who said the first owner pays for the hardware? They don't pay for the hardware, reducing the initial purchase price, and instead the manufacturer banks on recouping the cost of installing the hardware via future subscriptions. This actually lowers the production costs, because the manufacturer doesn't have to account for different hardware configurations. Instead they build all the cars the same and then unlock features based on what the buyer decides to subscribe to.
With the way car prices increase every year, you could've fooled me that the average consumer is benefitting!
This is not the sell video game consoles at a loss and make it back in the video game software business model. Believe me when I say these cars don't sell at a loss!
With the way car prices increase every year, you could've fooled me that the average consumer is benefitting!
This is not the sell video game consoles at a loss and make it back in the video game software business model. Believe me when I say these cars don't sell at a loss!
Not yet it is. Polestar is the only manufacturer so far who is trying the subscription model, although I haven't checked recently how that is going or if they've abandoned the model. Today's cars are still being sold on the premise that you option them the way you want and pay for all the options, and then there are a few subscription based connected car features that you can subscribe to. There's a good chance that especially with EVs personal car ownership is going away and is getting replaced with subscription models. So instead of buying a car, you pay a monthly subscription and get to change into a new car once a year or something like that.
Last edited by superswiss; 05-30-2024 at 06:45 PM.
Not yet it is. Polestar is the only manufacturer so far who is trying the subscription model, although I haven't checked recently how that is going or if they've abandoned the model. Today's cars are still being sold on the premise that you option them the way you want and pay for all the options, and then there are a few subscription based connected car features that you can subscribe to.
Honestly, the only mainstream cars selling at a loss these days are EVs and only because no one wants them! The high insurance gets old real fast after more people find out that cars are declared total losses from what many would consider minor accidents for an ICE car!
If it makes you feel better Lexus does the same thing. Doesn't bother me...I find value in the Mercedes Me functions so I pay for them, if you don't find value in them don't pay for them. On my Chrysler the remote start is built into the fob but you have to pay for the app. I like the app, so I pay for the app. No big deal.
I see little value in having the remote start on the fob, but on the app where I can start it from within a building etc, that I like.
Originally Posted by EWL5
When Mercedes is interested in making luxury cars again, let me know!
Not sure why this means Mercedes isn't making luxury cars. Luxury costs money.
There's a good chance that especially with EVs personal car ownership is going away and is getting replaced with subscription models. So instead of buying a car, you pay a monthly subscription and get to change into a new car once a year or something like that.
I canceled Mercedes Me because the terms and conditions are highly invasive of my personal privacy. Mercedes Benz collects information reflecting your preferences, characteristics, predispositions, behavior, attitude, and any other inferences drawn from your personal information and can sell it to third party marketers, such as auto insurance companies. That includes navigation data, driving habits, internet searches, biometric data, car data, sensory data and app usage. I decided that the services provided by Mercedes Me are not worth the loss of privacy and the subscription expenses. You pay M-B for the services and they are free to further monetize your personal information with third parties. Each to their own, but it is worth understanding the fine print before accepting the terms and conditions.
05-29-2024, 06:25 PM
