2 Kills in 2 days!! C6 and GTO
#76
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mymbonline
Originally Posted by Thericker
Well I'm still down as long as they deliver my tires tomorrow....I did get a PM from the GTO guy---I told him to call my cell today haven't heard from him yet---he said there meeting in Huntington Beach at some mall around 4-5pm then on to the PCH----I'm not driving way down to HB, but I will meet anyone in LA beverly hills area w/Vadim
I'll call you tomorrow Vadim when I get my tires.
I'll call you tomorrow Vadim when I get my tires.
![wall](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
as much as i would love to silence these trolls
![poke](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/stickpoke.gif)
but i will b down to meet up w/ u, call me tommorow so we can set something up
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#77
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Show me a timeslip where any GTO with any sort of forced induction ever broke a 9. Ridiculous. IRS is the crippler there, you just can't do it in a car with such sloppy dynamics, a fat, flexy chassis and a poorly designed suspension without tack-welding the entire structure and ripping out every suspension bit. I've been building and tuning cars for years man, my Supra is a work of art with well over 100k in it , and its engine puts out over 1,000 ponies to the rear wheels with C16 in the tank (the rwhp figure in my sig is on 92 octane, the very first day we fired up the new engine). No GTO, nada, zip, zero, is gonna touch it.
You're comparing an engineering masterpiece, a car that has been revered for a decade as the best Japanese car ever built, to a car with a production run of a few years that is soon to be extinct due to complete lack of public interest.
And BTW: I just looked up timeslips for blown GTO's- Dragtimes.com states that a 600whp blown GTO ran an 11.344 @ 130 with a 1.9 60ft. time. Not, I repeat, not very impressive.
You're comparing an engineering masterpiece, a car that has been revered for a decade as the best Japanese car ever built, to a car with a production run of a few years that is soon to be extinct due to complete lack of public interest.
And BTW: I just looked up timeslips for blown GTO's- Dragtimes.com states that a 600whp blown GTO ran an 11.344 @ 130 with a 1.9 60ft. time. Not, I repeat, not very impressive.
#78
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by Falco
too bad...i'll be in beautiful san jose by 3pm...Vadim be sure to post the results so we can silence these trolls!
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![slap](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/slap.gif)
#80
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,732
Received 563 Likes
on
372 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by HLG600
I thought the Skyline was given the title of the best Japanese automobile ever. What is your best time in that Supra? I actually like that it's not insanely modified like those extreme widebody ones, this one looks like it can driven hard on a road, not just softly into a SEMA booth.
Thanks for your compliments on the look of the car, all I've done to the exterior is the CF hood, which I painted, the CF RMM wing which most people consider the wing that should have just come with the car, and I have a CF front splitter that is sitting in my basement. I can basically drive the thing everyday, as the clutch is a carbon/carbon unit that will both handle over 1000hp and slip all day long (carbon clutches actually get grippier as they get hotter, the inverse of what organic/metal clutches do). But alas I don't really drive it b/c no TC=Me in a wall if I hit a bump.
#81
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SFV, CA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 SLK55
Originally Posted by Thericker
Hey guy why the insult? I haven't treated you w/any disrespect
![slap](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/slap.gif)
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![slap](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/slap.gif)
#82
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Ahhh some guys are in the Skyline camp, but those things are hell to modify, because when you go over 500hp (which the supra can do on a stock fuel system and stock turbos) the transmission needs to be REPLACED with something more akin to a full dog box, and I don't know if you know how to rev match and double clutch, but its not fun on everyday roads. Maybe I should have said the best Japanese car ever available in the US.
Thanks for your compliments on the look of the car, all I've done to the exterior is the CF hood, which I painted, the CF RMM wing which most people consider the wing that should have just come with the car, and I have a CF front splitter that is sitting in my basement. I can basically drive the thing everyday, as the clutch is a carbon/carbon unit that will both handle over 1000hp and slip all day long (carbon clutches actually get grippier as they get hotter, the inverse of what organic/metal clutches do). But alas I don't really drive it b/c no TC=Me in a wall if I hit a bump.
Thanks for your compliments on the look of the car, all I've done to the exterior is the CF hood, which I painted, the CF RMM wing which most people consider the wing that should have just come with the car, and I have a CF front splitter that is sitting in my basement. I can basically drive the thing everyday, as the clutch is a carbon/carbon unit that will both handle over 1000hp and slip all day long (carbon clutches actually get grippier as they get hotter, the inverse of what organic/metal clutches do). But alas I don't really drive it b/c no TC=Me in a wall if I hit a bump.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 414
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 Corvette Z06/2011 BMW M3
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
A GTO keeping up with an E60 M5???
Can I order a pound of what you're smoking??
On the highway an E60 is slightly faster than an E55!!
If you did, in fact, stay even it was because A. The driver doesn't know what a "power band" is or B. It wasn't broken in and he had it in P400.
I see a GTO, I smoke a GTO. I see a C6, I smoke a C6. There's not much that can touch this thing, and the only American badges I'm afraid of are SRT/10 and Z06.
![slap](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/slap.gif)
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
If you did, in fact, stay even it was because A. The driver doesn't know what a "power band" is or B. It wasn't broken in and he had it in P400.
I see a GTO, I smoke a GTO. I see a C6, I smoke a C6. There's not much that can touch this thing, and the only American badges I'm afraid of are SRT/10 and Z06.
#85
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by 6.3AMG
Smoke a C6? Hardly. Beat, yes(stock only).
Last edited by Carl Lassiter; 08-07-2006 at 10:56 PM. Reason: typos
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 414
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 Corvette Z06/2011 BMW M3
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
You're numerous posts make very little sense. You're "stock only" reference is superfluous and I agree with Cylinder that a C6 isn't keeping up with an E60 M5. Not to mention the fact the M5 has more than one string to its bow.
numerous? Its the only post I made on THIS thread
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
#87
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by 6.3AMG
numerous? Its the only post I made on THIS thread![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
ta-ta little troll-boy!!
#88
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ATL.GA.
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01 C320, 07 Tacoma, 67 F100, 08 boxter S
Why are these people that are so in love with the GTOs' and C6s' in a MB forum? Cant a man just post a kill, get some props, and move on?
I just dont get it
You dont see us going over to the "budget domestics" room and causing a fuss do you? Its just like when you are on the nice side of town trying to enjoy a moment, and some skank in a camaro with flowmasters comes "kid rockin" it down the road and F#cking up your chi. lol.
Mad props to Yellow R1 for fending off the trolls er.. "kid rocks" and keeping your cool.
And why does this Exodus guy keep talking about blowing goats???
I just dont get it
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Mad props to Yellow R1 for fending off the trolls er.. "kid rocks" and keeping your cool.
And why does this Exodus guy keep talking about blowing goats???
![Wtf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wtf.gif)
#90
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
12 Posts
03 E500 and Corvette
Originally Posted by Pmoffatt
What year was the GTO and Corvette? Was the Corvette a Z06 option or standard? They must not have been trying because they have better axle ratios and the weight to horsepower ratios are better than yours.
SLK AMG app. 9.5 lbs/hp
2006 Pontiac GTO app. 9.3 lbs/hp
2006 Standard Corvette app. 7.9 lbs/hp
2005 Z06 Corvette app. 6.4 Lbs/hp
SLK55 AMG
355 HP (DIN) - Axle: 3.06 Weight: 3397.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 9.5 lbs/HP
2006 GTO
400 HP (SAE Net) - Axle: 3.63 Weight: 3700.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 9.25 lbs/HP
2006 Corvette (Standard)
400 HP (SAE Net) - Axle: 3.42 Weight: 3199.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 7.9 lbs/HP
2006 Corvette (Z06)
500 HP (SAE Net) - Axle: 3.42 Weight: 3199.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 6.4 lbs/HP
SLK AMG app. 9.5 lbs/hp
2006 Pontiac GTO app. 9.3 lbs/hp
2006 Standard Corvette app. 7.9 lbs/hp
2005 Z06 Corvette app. 6.4 Lbs/hp
SLK55 AMG
355 HP (DIN) - Axle: 3.06 Weight: 3397.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 9.5 lbs/HP
2006 GTO
400 HP (SAE Net) - Axle: 3.63 Weight: 3700.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 9.25 lbs/HP
2006 Corvette (Standard)
400 HP (SAE Net) - Axle: 3.42 Weight: 3199.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 7.9 lbs/HP
2006 Corvette (Z06)
500 HP (SAE Net) - Axle: 3.42 Weight: 3199.00 Pounds + Driver.
App. 6.4 lbs/HP
I own an E500 and vet. vettdvr
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)