GT2 humiliates W221 S65
It is there, in the thread, from very early on. Furthermore, I even pointed this out to another guy.
Shall I quote them for you, ldangeli, or are you capable of going back and reading the post for yourself?
And the fact is that long after I pointed out that I agreed with you on this point, you continued to argue, so this is a red herring, nothing more.
Yes, I quoted SL65 acceleration data, to show that the S65 would be faster; at that time, I did not have an S65 test, or video, or timeslip, which I have now. But I did have data showing, since backed up by my finding an S65 test, and videos, and timeslips, that the S65 is equally as fast. So the citing of that data was valid.
And again you refer to the citing of data as a "rant", establishing ever more firmly that you regard the citing of data which disagrees with what you want to believe as insulting, a rant, etc.
In other words, as long as someone agrees with everything you say, they are your best friend. The moment they disagree with anything you say, even if they agree with other things you say, they become your worst enemy and are treated as such.
And the facts speak for themselves: the moderators banned you for a week for issuing insults after being warned no fewer than three times.
As to my ride: it will bury anything you drive, so I don't think you want to go there. Wow, a CLK430? CLK55 AMG kills it. S4? Close, but no cigar. You don't even own an AMG, and you have the sack to take potshots at one? At least I own one, dude....

I note that you refused to answer my question, so I repeat it: I've laid out a plethora of road tests, videos of both cars at dragstrips, timeslips (which were, I remind you, provided by you ), and even the testimony of our own Ben Treynor and Rogerv, who you might happen to note owns *both* of the cars in question.
So answer the following question: how could one look at all of that and conclude that the preponderance of evidence shows the Gallardo to be faster?
Answer the question. You argued with me over this, and continue to claim that my presentation of this data is "insulting". How? Where is my analysis unsound?
Last edited by Improviz; Oct 20, 2006 at 10:41 AM.
WOW.. As for me owning an AMG, yes I had one, got rid of it, and if you search my posts of late, you'll see both my Silver AMG sitting next to my black 430. But I thought you did your research. Someone else had asked about it. You really think that your one 5 year old car impresses me or anyone else? Bury anything I drive? I don't buy cars for their speed alone? THat just proves your arrogance. Really. if you want to whip out peckers and start comparing, well lets see then, had a 360, got rid of it, had an AMG, got rid of it, currently have an S4, 50k, (Bought it new) currently have a 5 year old 430 - 60k (bought it new), Currently have an ML500 - 50K (bought it new), currently have a RRS Supercharged, 78K (bought it new), currently looking at a 911 Twin in comparison to a Gallardo. So, if you want throw down, because you think your man enough. I'll be more than happy to.The moderator who banned me is a friend of yours and has sided with you on multiple occassions when bias was needed, so don't fool yourself.
As for your question, again, go back and slowly read my posts. I never said the Gallardo was faster. I made a statement about the unbelievable speed of the S65. WOW, you proved me wrong.
It is there, in the thread, from very early on. Furthermore, I even pointed this out to another guy.
Shall I quote them for you, ldangeli, or are you capable of going back and reading the post for yourself?
Yes, I quoted SL65 acceleration data, to show that the S65 would be faster; at that time, I did not have an S65 test, or video, or timeslip, which I have now. But I did have data showing, since backed up by my finding an S65 test, and videos, and timeslips, that the S65 is equally as fast. So the citing of that data was valid.
And again you refer to the citing of data as a "rant", establishing ever more firmly that you regard the citing of data which disagrees with what you want to believe as insulting, a rant, etc.
In other worse, as long as someone agrees with everything you say, they are your best friend. The moment they disagree with anything you say, even if they agree with other things you say, they become your worst enemy and are treated as such.
And the facts speak for themselves: the moderators banned you for a week for issuing insults after being warned no fewer than three times.
As to my ride: it will bury anything you drive, so I don't think you want to go there. Wow, a CLK430? CLK55 AMG kills it. S4? Close, but no cigar. You don't even own an AMG, and you have the sack to take potshots at one? At least I own one, dude....

I note that you refused to answer my question, so I repeat it: I've laid out a plethora of road tests, videos of both cars at dragstrips, timeslips (which were, I remind you, provided by you ), and even the testimony of our own Ben Treynor and Rogerv, who you might happen to note owns *both* of the cars in question.
So answer the following question: how could one look at all of that and conclude that the preponderance of evidence shows the Gallardo to be faster?
Answer the question. You argued with me over this, and continue to claim that my presentation of this data is "insulting". How? Where is my analysis unsound?
WOW.. As for me owning an AMG, yes I had one, got rid of it, and if you search my posts of late, you'll see both my Silver AMG sitting next to my black 430. But I thought you did your research. Someone else had asked about it. You really think that your one 5 year old car impresses me or anyone else?Again: any of the cars you own. $1,000 a race. Bring it. Otherwise, retract your idiotic "Honda" statement.
As for your question, again, go back and slowly read my posts. I never said the Gallardo was faster. I made a statement about the unbelievable speed of the S65. WOW, you proved me wrong.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...78#post1799678
As to what you were arguing: you are simply uncapable of telling the truth. I pointed out to you in my first post in the thread, I wrote the following:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....1&postcount=18
You did it again in your next post:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....6&postcount=20

Here is the thread:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=163025
I'd go on quoting more examples of your arguing about the S65 in that thread, but it won't make any difference, and you'll just come up with some other red herring or rant.
Last edited by Improviz; Oct 20, 2006 at 11:07 AM.
BY then you'll have upgraded? HAHA. By when? I may buy the 911 or the gallardo next week, next month or next spring. You really are a fool Complete and total fool. "I'm not wallowing in poverty" - Um, ok, never put your financial stature to the test. SHUT UP!
Never said any of my cars would beat your wonderful AMG, and again for the 100th time, because you are so freaking thick headed, as I stated over and over, I didn't refute the S65 being faster, I stated I couldn't believe it was that fast!! YOU ARE AN IDIOT! JESUS CHRIST, please my ears are bleeding just shut up, shut up, shut up, shut up.
Sure. Let me know when you get your turbo. By then, I'll probably have upgraded, and we can run. I'm not exactly wallowing in poverty here, dude, and talk is cheap. You made the ridiculous statement that my AMG couldn't "beat a Honda", and started with the cheap shots. As I said: my AMG will slaughter anything you own. So if you can't bring the heat, you might think about shutting up about how Hondas can beat my car, dude.
Again: any of the cars you own. $1,000 a race. Bring it. Otherwise, retract your idiotic "Honda" statement.
False and false. I don't know the moderator personally, and he banned you for violations of the Terms of Use, which I listed here:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...78#post1799678
As to what you were arguing: you are simply uncapable of telling the truth. I pointed out to you in my first post in the thread, I wrote the following:
Again: arguing the Lambo is faster than the S65. As you continued to do, for multiple posts, in that thread. And now you lie about it. But anyone can read it...you are not fooling anyone, except possibly yourself.

I'd go on quoting more examples of your arguing about the S65 in that thread, but it won't make any difference, and you'll just come up with some other red herring or rant.

Last edited by ldangeli; Oct 20, 2006 at 11:24 AM.

Well, you've dug yourself into that hole deep enough to satisfy me....I now return you to your regularly scheduled rant-and-insult campaign.

Well, you've dug yourself into that hole deep enough to satisfy me....I now return you to your regularly scheduled rant-and-insult campaign.





The Best of Mercedes & AMG



