Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

CLK 63 BS vs Dodge Challenger SRT8 LOL!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-21-2009, 01:36 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by Deuuuce
If you want to call a $40k sedan that easily runs low 13s bone stock and tops out a 173mph a slug, go ahead. That would include C5s, E39 M5s, and host of other sloths too.

Or I/E/dyno-tuned running 12s in the 113-114mph range giving pullied C32s a headache a slug, you're entitled to your opinion.

But it's your research that is lacking. 7 SRT-8s in the 10s, an eighth one trapping over 130mph:
http://www.lxforums.com/board/timeslips.php

Not bad considering they weigh 2-tons like FI AMGs but never came FI from the factory.
Right, I was looking for videos-- not posts on a site that a 13-year old can modify. In any event, impressive still-- BUT, to take out JRCart's Black Series, it's going to take more then "light-modding", that was my main point; I hardly consider S/C, cams, heads, coated headers, ecu, pulley, & Nitrous "light-modding". I went with the fastest SRT-8 **I** was able to find, guess someone should go ahead an send a message to the 11.2 SRT-8 and inform him he no longers holds the crown.

And, they (the ones in the 10s) must have an insane amount of whp because even the one that trapped 11.9 was at 565whp... over 140whp of a stock E55, yet posts the same numbers. Don't forget, while the SRT-8s weigh 2-tons, so do the E55s!

Thank you for posting up the numbers and clearing that up!

Last edited by Akademiks; 03-21-2009 at 01:42 PM.
Old 03-21-2009, 01:41 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by Timeless
Had to fix that for you as they would beat a stock 63 Black series.
When I said "the Black Series", yes it was in reference to JRcarts'. Even still, in a rolling-start, I don't doubt even a stock one (Black Series) would put up a fight against the GTR... you know, unless they have the ECU'd GTR.
Old 03-21-2009, 04:17 PM
  #53  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by Akademiks
When I said "the Black Series", yes it was in reference to JRcarts'. Even still, in a rolling-start, I don't doubt even a stock one (Black Series) would put up a fight against the GTR... you know, unless they have the ECU'd GTR.
The BS basically weighs the same as the E63, maybe 50-100lbs less, you now that right? It also has the same engine and tranny. GTR is a faster car stock to stock and the Z06 would humiliate it, the M5 traps higher too. I like the BS, and it's a good all rounder but freeway dominator it is not. Leave that to the S65.

Last edited by transferred; 03-21-2009 at 04:20 PM.
Old 03-21-2009, 05:06 PM
  #54  
Banned
 
Akademiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL600
Originally Posted by transferred
The BS basically weighs the same as the E63, maybe 50-100lbs less, you now that right? It also has the same engine and tranny. GTR is a faster car stock to stock and the Z06 would humiliate it, the M5 traps higher too. I like the BS, and it's a good all rounder but freeway dominator it is not. Leave that to the S65.
I wasn't referring to the Z06 here. I was talking about the GTR. I've heard some conflicting times being posted with those things. Ranging anywhere from high 12s to mid 11s.

As I said, I think it would depend on the GTR.

And yeah, your 65s just not fair.
Old 03-21-2009, 09:07 PM
  #55  
Super Member
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
Originally Posted by Akademiks
And, they (the ones in the 10s) must have an insane amount of whp because even the one that trapped 11.9 was at 565whp... over 140whp of a stock E55, yet posts the same numbers. Don't forget, while the SRT-8s weigh 2-tons, so do the E55s!

Thank you for posting up the numbers and clearing that up!
There are issues with the stock SRT-8 halfshafts at high hp levels, so guys launch gingerly or don't bother with DRs or slicks. Those that do seem to have the 10 second cars with good 60fts.

And yes, for 116-118mph trap speeds, an S/C or heads/cam will be needed.

Got to take the databases at face value - including the Corvette forums too!

Last edited by Deuuuce; 03-21-2009 at 09:11 PM.
Old 03-22-2009, 03:35 AM
  #56  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by Akademiks
A GTR would not beat the Black Series-- especially not in a rolling-start, and not stir up drama but I'm pretty sure a Z06 can't either. Regardless, even if he raced a Z06 and posted the story here lord knows it's going to start a fire. Yeah, I know... the car can't be beat.

And also in regards to SRT-8_Turbo as well, price? Please-- a ricer excuse if I ever heard one. Fact is, and I don't know how many times I've said this, if I really wanted the fastest car on the block, I can very easily pick up a 88' Civic hatchback, strip it, drop a beefed up B16 in there, a couple go-fast bottles of juice, and run 9s all the day at the track-- yes, that's faster then any stock Viper ACR, ZR1, Zonda, BS etc. etc.

And... best part? It'd be for but a FRACTION of the price of any of those.

With that said, I do like my vented seats, navigation, distronic and convertible top, thank you.

+1..i agree its a ricer excuse. I hate it when a car gets beats, someone goes well if the car had this or this mod, i would've smoked that car.


Question? is it still considered a ricer excuse if a domestic lover uses it?
Old 03-24-2009, 12:14 PM
  #57  
Super Member
 
Z06EATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA BayArea
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1997 C36AMG
Originally Posted by hkycoldrct



Our Govenor even likes this one! eatts goooot a seax poooint vone litreee Hemmmmi ein it.
LMFAO
Old 03-28-2009, 03:26 PM
  #58  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
jrcart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Naperville, IL/Chicago
Posts: 6,621
Received 54 Likes on 44 Posts
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
I can't believe this thread is still alive, I posted this like 9 months ago LOL
Old 03-31-2009, 12:18 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
JG26_Irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Morehead, KY USA
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
SLK55 AMG, E320 BlueTec, ML350, (formerly) C32 AMG, MR2 Turbo, HD-FLH-FSE, BMW R100RS, Ducati M900
What kind of MB is that??

Originally Posted by SickSpeedMonte
Should have said, "Oh yea? Well could it do this?" and mashed the go pedal

I was thinking about how cool it woudl be to have a C32, put the sport wheels on it, de-badge it, and put the C230 grill/upright star on it. I actually like the look of the C230, and I dont think too many people would expect it to be fast, even if they knew what to look for.
HaHa, later that day, I actually sort of did that. She was running out of time to make her flight out at the airport. We had about 15 miles to go. I had been going moderately quick but never hard on the gas. But, I had to stop for a red light on the edge of town. When it turned green, I short shifted thru the gears at about 1/4 throttle, but just enough to engage the Supercharger. With the C3P intake you can really hear it whine and even at light throttle and short shifting, it ran from 0-about 80 in ~10 sec. Just a tiny bit of exhaust growl. She turns to me and say's, "Your right, this one is different from my C230"

Mine has the upright star on the hood and cept for the wide tires on the larger wheels, the big brakes and the AMG badge on the rear and V6 Kompressor badges on the sides, it sorta looks like a regular C-Klasse. But the Ferrari Red is a bit of a give away.

Irish
Attached Thumbnails CLK 63 BS vs Dodge Challenger SRT8 LOL!-amg-red.jpg  
Old 04-22-2009, 08:53 PM
  #60  
Super Member
 
Mantooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by jrcart
I can't believe this thread is still alive, I posted this like 9 months ago LOL
BUMP! lol

I just came in here to say that my bone stock 04 E55 was tried by both a Challenger SRT8 and a Charger SRT8. If we were to put these races on a point systems, it would go as follows...

E55-2
SRT8-0

Oh, but I bet if it had a supercharger, it would have been closer.
Old 04-24-2009, 02:07 AM
  #61  
Junior Member
 
Flight55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by vtecsti
BUMP! lol

I just came in here to say that my bone stock 04 E55 was tried by both a Challenger SRT8 and a Charger SRT8. If we were to put these races on a point systems, it would go as follows...

E55-2
SRT8-0

Oh, but I bet if it had a supercharger, it would have been closer.


ahahahahahah omg ahahahahaha only if! after you beat them, call the wambulance for them
Old 04-24-2009, 04:53 PM
  #62  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by jrcart
I can't believe this thread is still alive, I posted this like 9 months ago LOL
the dodge guys are a proud bunch...

-Rob

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLK 63 BS vs Dodge Challenger SRT8 LOL!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.