Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

Crossfire vs. 211 E55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 10:08 PM
  #1  
moparrbust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
2005 Crossfire SRT-6
Crossfire vs. 211 E55

I went out last night for some runs and two E55's showed up(wich is very rare). I talked to a cool guy that ownes a silver one and he told me that his buddy ownes the black one and it put down 480rwhp and would be a good race against me. I ended up lining up against the black one by luck of the draw and here's the result.............


Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #2  
Benz-O-Rama's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 26
From: Maryland
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Your Crossfire is quick, no doubt. But with only a 112 MPH, that E55 has some issues. Most likely a bad I/C pump.

And did he completely fall asleep at the line? That's got to be one of the worst R/Ts I've ever seen.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
RacerX0911's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Benz-O-Rama
Your Crossfire is quick, no doubt. But with only a 112 MPH, that E55 has some issues. Most likely a bad I/C pump.

And did he completely fall asleep at the line? That's got to be one of the worst R/Ts I've ever seen.
lol
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
moparrbust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
2005 Crossfire SRT-6
Originally Posted by Benz-O-Rama
Your Crossfire is quick, no doubt. But with only a 112 MPH, that E55 has some issues. Most likely a bad I/C pump.

And did he completely fall asleep at the line? That's got to be one of the worst R/Ts I've ever seen.
The E55's time doesn't seem that far off to me. I had a 460rwhp Charger SRT-8 and it could only manage 12.8's at 109 with a 2.0 60'.......and I raced and beat a E63(by a fender length) in it as well. With that being said and the E55 supposedly making 480rwhp a 12.5@112 with a 2.0' is on par. This race was at LVMS, not Famoso or some other track that has 0 or negative DA.


I too thought the guy took a short nap before leaving the line. Maybe he thought he would play with the little Crossfire by giving a big head start and reeling me in to add insult to his intended win. I didn't get a chance to talk to the guy before or after the race.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #5  
cal1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,897
Likes: 85
From: Central WI (BFE)
SL55, ML500 & Acura TL
Nice run, what kind of mods are you running on that quick car.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #6  
moparrbust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
2005 Crossfire SRT-6
Originally Posted by cal1
Nice run, what kind of mods are you running on that quick car.
SL55 complete intake
my own custom modded AMG manifolds
inmotion tune(that needs re tuning)
custom 3 gallon resevoir in trunk and separated s/c cooling system
LET 185 pulley
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #7  
frankthetank's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
e55
unhealthy E55.

Originally Posted by moparrbust
The E55's time doesn't seem that far off to me. I had a 460rwhp Charger SRT-8 and it could only manage 12.8's at 109 with a 2.0 60'.......and I raced and beat a E63(by a fender length) in it as well. With that being said and the E55 supposedly making 480rwhp a 12.5@112 with a 2.0' is on par. This race was at LVMS, not Famoso or some other track that has 0 or negative DA.


I too thought the guy took a short nap before leaving the line. Maybe he thought he would play with the little Crossfire by giving a big head start and reeling me in to add insult to his intended win. I didn't get a chance to talk to the guy before or after the race.
This claimed 480rwhp sounds optimistic. That's nearly 100hp over stock and it only ran a 12.5@112? A stock e55 would be the same or better even at a higher elevation. Maybe the car is not running %100 or maybe the hp is guestimated. Either way, your car is really quick and this e55 should be quicker.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #8  
E55AMGGG04's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
04 w211 E55
I was just at the track a few nights ago for the first time ever. I had some bad 60 ft's and bad reaction times lol. My best was 12.5 @ 114.6 2.0 60 ft. I'm going to another track which records quicker times for watevr reason.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #9  
jmf003's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by moparrbust
I went out last night for some runs and two E55's showed up(wich is very rare). I talked to a cool guy that ownes a silver one and he told me that his buddy ownes the black one and it put down 480rwhp and would be a good race against me. I ended up lining up against the black one by luck of the draw and here's the result.............
Nice work to get your SRT running 12.0 @ 116!

Originally Posted by E55AMGGG04
I was just at the track a few nights ago for the first time ever. I had some bad 60 ft's and bad reaction times lol. My best was 12.5 @ 114.6 2.0 60 ft. I'm going to another track which records quicker times for watevr reason.
Don't sweat the reaction time. If you're running against the clock rather than the car next to you, r/t just doesn't matter.

Key thing is the 60' time. Nail that and everything else will follow.

FWIW....
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #10  
moparrbust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
2005 Crossfire SRT-6
Originally Posted by frankthetank
This claimed 480rwhp sounds optimistic. That's nearly 100hp over stock and it only ran a 12.5@112? A stock e55 would be the same or better even at a higher elevation. Maybe the car is not running %100 or maybe the hp is guestimated. Either way, your car is really quick and this e55 should be quicker.

His buddy said he took it to Vadim and had it dynoed in Cali and it put down 480rwhp. 211 E55's run mid to low 13's out here stock.............nobody ever believes me until they come and run their cars. Everybody that I've ever seen bring out a high dollar high hp car(that is stock) goes home disappointed and thinking something's wrong with their car after running at LVMS. The semi high altitude, bad dry air coulpled with poor track prep= sub par timeslips...........especially for N/A cars.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #11  
cahiil55k's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
211-55
Originally Posted by moparrbust
His buddy said he took it to Vadim and had it dynoed in Cali and it put down 480rwhp. 211 E55's run mid to low 13's out here stock.............nobody ever believes me until they come and run their cars. Everybody that I've ever seen bring out a high dollar high hp car(that is stock) goes home disappointed and thinking something's wrong with their car after running at LVMS. The semi high altitude, bad dry air coulpled with poor track prep= sub par timeslips...........especially for N/A cars.
The time slip speaks volumes, moreso than dyno numbers, so great win for you there. As for the 480hp E55, I corrected their mid-12 second ET and trap speeds and something just doesn't seem right. Corrected, considering the night of the 13th was hovering near 3000' DA, they're still only running ~12.2ish with traps under 118. For comparison, my 465rwhp (Dynojet) in 1800' DA trapped 122.9xx on 3 runs with street tires and poor track prep.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #12  
Deuuuce's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Charger SRT-8
Originally Posted by moparrbust
The E55's time doesn't seem that far off to me. I had a 460rwhp Charger SRT-8 and it could only manage 12.8's at 109 with a 2.0 60'.......
To put that in perspective, a 400rwhp Charger would run 12.6s @ 114mph in negative DA. Or that 12.8 @ 109 time at 100 degree outdoor temps.

A H/C SRT-8 like that would run low 12s @ 117mph or so?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 11:00 PM
  #13  
mrphotoman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
srt6
cool video.

what did you do to your im's?

Last edited by mrphotoman; Nov 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #14  
V12Godspeed's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 5
From: South FL & NYC
Your worst nightmare...
Now that's how you fall asleep at the tree...LOL.

Nice Run for the SRT!
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #15  
tyanger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: DFW
09 C63 steel grey
Originally Posted by V12Godspeed
Now that's how you fall asleep at the tree...LOL.

Nice Run for the SRT!
+1

At first I thought it was a bracket race
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.