When I ran the 300c Srt-8 modded 40-120 with my Clk55 I pretty much kept up. But my friends E63 was a whole new ball game. Talk about a raping By only 120 the E63 was gone I mean gone! My Clk55 was left for dead!

 

A bolton,tuned 300c srt-8 is close to 500hp crank no? Even so the Srt-8 will get a good beating vs the stock E63. They both lbs about the same. My C63 is 3900lbs and has 457hp. I'm sure his modded Srt-8 runs low 12s. About the same as a stock C63 in the 1/4. But from a roll not even a close run vs a stock C63. So even if I had a 150lb passenger do you think it would be a close run vs his modded Srt-8(more than 457hp same lb)? I'm sure he puts out more then 457hp crank.

 

I don't know ,you know so much ,why don't tell you me!

 

I think they have bumped it to a 3.06 in the new one, as I've searched around and all of the sources I've found state it as 3.06, except the fine folks at MB, who have better things to do than list such minutae on their website.

Hey, waitaminute, AMG has a separate website, let me check there: oh, yeah, that settles it: they're listing it as 2.82!!!

Yeah, but that's the great thing about Mopars, they've got lots of options to beef them up pretty quickly that won't bust the bank. Always been a Mopar fan, still have an original "426 Hemi" side badge from the old days, had it since I was a kid.

They upgraded it? Geez I'm slippin', hadn't heard about that.

 

Did this 300C actually trap 115 before you ran it? If so, he should've left your CLK55 for dead unless something was wrong, as that's a 6 mph trap difference, and from experience, a 6 mph trap difference makes for a pretty brisk walk up high.

If you'd started the run at 80 it'd be a bit tighter due to his aerodynamics, but from 40-100 alone he should have pulled 4+ lengths. Was this one run, or multiple runs? If you got a half second jump or thereabouts that would narrow the lead pretty substantially...

 

I kill those all the time, not even close.

 

 

This is a car forum I drive a 09 C63 you drive a old 10 yr old car so it doesnt matter what you write in your sig Don't want to rub it in but you are jealous. Don't be hating son

 

Yes he had a time slip. He pulls in 2nd gear (about a car)and I keep up in 3rd. So the 40-120 he gets me almost 2cars. Did the runs couple times. The Clk55 vs E63 run he is gone before I hit 100. Same 40-120. The 6.3 AMG is no joke

 

Care to show a time slip for your high 12s@111+?

 

Neither is the 5.5L S/C AMG, Jon, as a quick look at dragtimes.com will attest....plenty of them in the 10's, and plenty more with trap speeds well over 120, it's a lot easier to mod an FI car than an NA car. So please, spare me the d!ck-wagging, it's not impressing me or anyone else.

If he's trapping 115, he'd pull a car trapping 109 by more than two cars unless there's something wrong. It's one carlength per mph, Jon, and 115-109 spells would get roughly six lengths, not two. Something's not right here. Either you got a jump, his car doesn't trap 115, or something was wrong with it when you ran it in the CLK, or you're embellishing again.

As to the E63 compared to the 300C, this makes no sense. Stock E63s trap in the 115-ish range, give or take a few, and here's a quick lesson: if it and the modded 300C trap the same speed, then allow me to state what should be the exceedingly obvious here: this means that over the same distance, they've both accelerated to the same speed. Which, in turn, means that neither of them would be appreciably further ahead of the other by the speed of 115 mph, which means that if one of them left you for dead, then the other one would have left you for dead.

Now, I agree that up above this speed, the E63 would be faster due to better aerodynamics and gearing, but TO that speed they should both pull you by roughly the same amount, unless the guy in the 300C is either lying about his trap speed, screwing up mightily (i.e., shifting himself, not a good idea w/that tranny as it shifts s-l-o-w-l-y in manual mode, unless they've fixed it since I had mine), was carrying a lot of extra weight, or had something go wrong w/his car.

So, in yet another link in a long chain, we see yet another Jon story that defies the laws of physics.

For the two people out there that buy this: I've got some real estate for sale, a condo in Miami. Wanna buy? I promise, it's a great investment!!

 

I was referring to a stock E63. Its no brainer a FI motor is mod friendly. Cars that run in the 9s make 10sec cars slow,etc. Well this is what happened in the real world. BTW that Condo in Miami is a great investment!

 

Well, get a vidcam and give him a few runs and get 'em up here, along with his 115 mph timeslip. If you'd ever put some vids up here, it would certainly silence the doubters.

 

So your saying if i prove his car traps 115 he will be close with my C63? If I see him I will run him.

 

Say what? We're talking about your CLK55, and your claim that it'll run within two lengths of a car that traps 115 all the way up to 140, which I think is rubbish.

I don't know what your C63 traps at, nor do you, but according to you, your CLK55 trapped at 108.6, and it was that car that you said ran a 115-trapping 300C all the way up to 140, only losing a few lengths in the process. So, what I'd like to see is video of your CLK55 doing what you said it could do, as I don't think it's plausible.

If in this video you run as close to him as you say without getting a jump and can establish that his car did, in fact trap at 115 mph, then I'll be very happy to eat my words.

 

Re-read what I wrote where I said that at Atco everybodys car will do fast times because it is one of the fastest tracks on the east coast. And the word I stressed is probably 111 to 112mph, bottom line is that my 5.5L converted C43 is faster than your CLK55. I will def go run at Atco as soon as it opens again. Bring your CLK55 to E-town and we can run for 1k. Put up or shut up clown! And stop your lies Son!

I guaurantee your car won't run 108mph. Put up the loot SON!

Now continue with your lies again about how your car runs with Will's SRT8 from 40 to 120mph.
You are a very delusional young man who needs help.

Hey how about racing my 15 yr old eagle Talon vs your C63 for 1K? Should help you with a car payment if you win.

 

No 40-120 was a few cars. I has some other gearing mod now. But lets see how he does vs my C63.

 

I meant the 300c has other gearing mod now.

 

 

My Atco timeslip of 13.1@108.6 is old news look it up. Don't assume your c55 will run high12s@111+. Time slips please.. I'm a clown? I'm also going to Atco in the spring with my C63. Don't know what it will run. Oh wait maybe high 11s@119. I did walk a E63.

 

I never said your modded c55 is not faster than my Clk55. But don't guess what it will run. Also which car would I rather be driving your 15 yr old Talon or a 09 C63? Please give it a rest.

 

Same *****, different day...Jon makes claim, gets challenged to prove claim, trys to change subject, when doesn't work, gesticulates and dances away.

Do you really think that anyone believes any of this crap? Honestly, what a waste of time.

 

Well unfortunately alot of people don't believe what they read or hear.

 

The C63 vs E63 claim was proven. My friend was really cool about it. But sadly most guys wouldve made excuses or think otherwise.

 

Most people don't believe claims as outlandish as yours.

As usual: change the subject to something unrelated to the topic at hand to try and divert attention from the bogus claim you made. I'm not discussing your run in your C63 vs. the E63, I'm discussing the claims you made about your CLK55, because as a former CLK55 owner (longer than you, in fact) who ran mid-12 cars and know what they'd do to one, not to mention knowing the laws of physics, I find your claim to be virtually impossible.

There is NO WAY that a 13.2 @ 108.6 car would be within two carlengths of a 12.5 @ 115 car in a 40-120 run, unless you jumped the gun, he screwed up mightily (doubtful if he can run a 12.5), or something was wrong with his car. It is physically impossible. Simple college-level Physics and Algebra will prove this, as will simple common sense, which you seem to believe that everyone here lacks: if he's accelerating to 6.5 mph faster than you in a 1/4 mile distance, then at the end of that distance since he is going faster, he will be pulling away from you.

Further, the very nature of acceleration is such that due to the higher multiplicative effect of lower gears at lower speeds, he'd pull away from you very quickly at lower speeds. Which, again, shows that you're making yet another BS claim, and as usual, when challenged to replicate it, you duck, dodge, weave, do everything but actually try to prove it, while if it's a run that you *know* you can win, like running your C63 against a car you know to be slower than yours, you suddenly turn from Ms. Mouse into Mr. Macho, and accuse anyone who won't show up and prove what common sense already tells anyone with a brain of being a wimp.

YOU made the claim. So far, you've claimed your CLK55 will run with an S/C AMG car from 5-60, that it beat an E90 M3 in a rolling race up pas 130 mph, that it pulled a supercharged Mustang, and now that it ran within two lengths of a 12.5 @ 115 mph car from 40-120.

Ridiculous.

And as is usual with the impossible claims with which you keep polluting this forum, you again refuse to make an honest effort to prove your claim, just as you refused to make any honest effort to prove the three previous, equally nonsensical claims.

Which to me proves that you're nothing but a habitual liar and a troll, who should've been kicked out of here a long time ago.