Modded C32 vs. E92 M3 Freeway Race
M3 was a sort of gun metal grey color. Really great looking car. My favorite color on one of my favorite cars. . . nice!
In any case, M3 came up behind me like a BOOH, and then slowed down quickly right next to me. I'm sure he saw the AMG badging, and was going to show me some "M Power." The traffic opened up in the fast lane only, so we were stuck doing a train race (me behind him). It seemed like we both hit it pretty much simultaneously at about 80 MPH, and ran up to about 130 MPH. To my surprise, he did not pull me, but nor was I closing the gap on him. It would have been really interesting if we had been able to line up side-by-side and had been able to run longer. I think that, without the 200 extra pounds of tires and wheels I might have been able to edge him slightly. Maybe, dunno.
I know that the E92's forte is really not straight-line stuff, and that he would absolutely kill me in twisties. I also know that I would trade my C32 for an E92 in a hot second (but would not trade my C32 plus $50K for one, which is probably what it would take).
My mods are 178 pulley, Powerchips, wires, plugs, SL55 intake, Optima, resonator removal, K&Ns. Best 1/4 is a 12.8/112





Nice run, wonder if he was 6 speed or DCT... if he was 6 speed, Im sure the DCT would have pulled ever so slightly.
My mods are 178 pulley, Powerchips, wires, plugs, SL55 intake, Optima, resonator removal, K&Ns. Best 1/4 is a 12.8/112

-Rob
M3 was a sort of gun metal grey color. Really great looking car. My favorite color on one of my favorite cars. . . nice!
In any case, M3 came up behind me like a BOOH, and then slowed down quickly right next to me. I'm sure he saw the AMG badging, and was going to show me some "M Power." The traffic opened up in the fast lane only, so we were stuck doing a train race (me behind him). It seemed like we both hit it pretty much simultaneously at about 80 MPH, and ran up to about 130 MPH. To my surprise, he did not pull me, but nor was I closing the gap on him. It would have been really interesting if we had been able to line up side-by-side and had been able to run longer. I think that, without the 200 extra pounds of tires and wheels I might have been able to edge him slightly. Maybe, dunno.
I know that the E92's forte is really not straight-line stuff, and that he would absolutely kill me in twisties. I also know that I would trade my C32 for an E92 in a hot second (but would not trade my C32 plus $50K for one, which is probably what it would take).
My mods are 178 pulley, Powerchips, wires, plugs, SL55 intake, Optima, resonator removal, K&Ns. Best 1/4 is a 12.8/112
It is effin' stupid. Maybe the draft helped him.

Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...cker_3f_page_2
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...cker_3f_page_2
Remember, in magazine tests it can often have more to do with conditions and engine variances from the factory rather than JUST the transmissions....
-Rob




http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...cker_3f_page_2
In Vbox 60-130MPH runs, even an RD Stroker 6MT making at least 70whp more than my DCT could not match my times, 10.71s vs. 11.02s. The fastest 6MT with comparable bolt ons is 11.58s in perfect conditions, I also managed a 119MPH trap, the highest 6MT with bolt on's is 115 I believe, so yes in most cases the DCT is faster, even well into triple digits.
In Vbox 60-130MPH runs, even an RD Stroker 6MT making at least 70whp more than my DCT could not match my times, 10.71s vs. 11.02s. The fastest 6MT with comparable bolt ons is 11.58s in perfect conditions, I also managed a 119MPH trap, the highest 6MT with bolt on's is 115 I believe, so yes in most cases the DCT is faster, even well into triple digits.
115mph is hardly into the triple digits and that is awfully low for a bolt-on 6MT car.
From what I could find, at 124mph the DCT shifts into 5th, a 4.38 overall ratio and the 6MT is 4.58 overall ratio (4th gear) up to 143mph.
At 150mph, the DCT car drops to a 3.79 ratio to 173mph and the 6MT car is in 5th, a 3.85 ratio all the way to 171mph.
I also found several mistakes on the m3 forum, using the wrong final drive ratio and not taking into account overall gear ratios including the final drive. Hopefully what I supplied is accurate.
It just reminds me of that one quote from jay leno. "Racing is like sex, every guy thinks he's good at it. Most arent." lol.
In Vbox 60-130MPH runs, even an RD Stroker 6MT making at least 70whp more than my DCT could not match my times, 10.71s vs. 11.02s. The fastest 6MT with comparable bolt ons is 11.58s in perfect conditions, I also managed a 119MPH trap, the highest 6MT with bolt on's is 115 I believe, so yes in most cases the DCT is faster, even well into triple digits.
http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/bmw-e92-m3-supercharger




and exactly- The DCT makes driving easier, maybe not more fun- but yet easier.Deuuuce thanks for the facts; I am sure you are correct. My experiences obviously involve driver input and real world conditions which take away from the gearing advantange that the 6 speed would have up top with two exact same cars driven in the exact same conditions with perfect driving. The DCT is just stupid easy IMHO.
and exactly- The DCT makes driving easier, maybe not more fun- but yet easier.Deuuuce thanks for the facts; I am sure you are correct. My experiences obviously involve driver input and real world conditions which take away from the gearing advantange that the 6 speed would have up top with two exact same cars driven in the exact same conditions with perfect driving. The DCT is just stupid easy IMHO.



