A guy in the latest body style V8 Camaro tried to run the C32 from a 50 MPH roll. C32 driver got the jump. Mullet Mobile downshifts. C32 driver lets off a bit to let him try to pull even. When the C32 gets back into the throttle the Camaro couldn't keep up. Repeated it twice. Camaro had a passenger, C32 did not.
Blue C5 with exhaust (and other mods) went from a 30 MPH roll and edged out the C32 by 1 car length to 75 MPH. C32 had a passenger and the C5 had only driver.
Big, nasty, loud, black late model Camaro with gauges on the a pillar and a huge lump on the custom hood went from a 10 MPH roll against the C32. C32 driver expects to get crushed by what appears to be possibly a 9-10 second car. Mullet Mobile gets the jump and the C32 matched its pace up to 50 MPH or so when both let off. All parties seemed surprised.
Kevin
Blue C5 with exhaust (and other mods) went from a 30 MPH roll and edged out the C32 by 1 car length to 75 MPH. C32 had a passenger and the C5 had only driver.
Big, nasty, loud, black late model Camaro with gauges on the a pillar and a huge lump on the custom hood went from a 10 MPH roll against the C32. C32 driver expects to get crushed by what appears to be possibly a 9-10 second car. Mullet Mobile gets the jump and the C32 matched its pace up to 50 MPH or so when both let off. All parties seemed surprised.
Kevin
Ha ha, you're funny. These Camaros were fast cars the V6 model would of had bus lengths put on it.
Here is a quote from a Motor Trend test regarding the V8 version "On our final trip to the track, the manually-equipped Camaro ran a best 0 to 60 time of 5.2 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 108 miles-per-hour. But the slightly torquier automatic Trans Am ran an almost identical 0 to 60 time of 5.1 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 107 miles-per-hour."
13.5@107 compares very well to my C32. Throw a passenger in the Camaro and that makes for the slight advantage I had on the stock one. The heavily modded one would have likely crushed me with enough open, straight road.
Kevin
Edit: It was this one...
1999 Camaro Z28 Specifications
Dimensions
Exterior Coupe Wheelbase 101.1/2568
Length 193.5/4915
Width 74.1/1882
Height 51.2/1301
Engine 5.7L V8 SFI
RPO LS1
Displacement (cu. in./liters)346/5.7
Bore & stroke (in.)3.90 x 3.62(mm) 99 x 92
Compression ratio 10.1:1
Cylinder block materialcast-aluminum
Cylinder head materialcast-aluminum
Valvetrain configurationOHV
Valves per cylinder 2
Induction system SFI
Ignition direct, coil near plug
Lifters hydraulic roller
Cam drive chain
Coolant capacity (quarts/liters)13.58/12.85
Oil capacity (quarts/liters)5.5/5.2
Alternator rating (amps)102
Battery (SAE rating, cca)525
Recommended unleaded fuel91 octane (87 acceptable)
Maximum engine speed (RPM)6000
Horsepower/kW (@ RPM)310/231 @ 5200
Torque/N-m (lb.-ft. @ RPM)340/461 @ 4000
0 / 60 mph5.2 sec
0 / 100 mph12.7 sec
Capacities and Weights
Seating 4
Fuel tank (approx. gal./liters) 16.8/63.6
Curb weights, estimated (lbs./kg)3439/1560
Transmission Type 6-speed manual
RPO MN6
First gear 2.66
Second gear 1.78
Third gear 1.30
Fourth gear 1.00
Fifth gear 0.74
Sixth gear 0.50
Reverse gear 2.90
Final drive ratio 3.42
Fluid capacity (quarts/liters) 4.0/3.8
Clutch size (in./mm) 11.7/297
Here is a quote from a Motor Trend test regarding the V8 version "On our final trip to the track, the manually-equipped Camaro ran a best 0 to 60 time of 5.2 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 108 miles-per-hour. But the slightly torquier automatic Trans Am ran an almost identical 0 to 60 time of 5.1 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 107 miles-per-hour."
13.5@107 compares very well to my C32. Throw a passenger in the Camaro and that makes for the slight advantage I had on the stock one. The heavily modded one would have likely crushed me with enough open, straight road.
Kevin
Edit: It was this one...
1999 Camaro Z28 Specifications
Dimensions
Exterior Coupe Wheelbase 101.1/2568
Length 193.5/4915
Width 74.1/1882
Height 51.2/1301
Engine 5.7L V8 SFI
RPO LS1
Displacement (cu. in./liters)346/5.7
Bore & stroke (in.)3.90 x 3.62(mm) 99 x 92
Compression ratio 10.1:1
Cylinder block materialcast-aluminum
Cylinder head materialcast-aluminum
Valvetrain configurationOHV
Valves per cylinder 2
Induction system SFI
Ignition direct, coil near plug
Lifters hydraulic roller
Cam drive chain
Coolant capacity (quarts/liters)13.58/12.85
Oil capacity (quarts/liters)5.5/5.2
Alternator rating (amps)102
Battery (SAE rating, cca)525
Recommended unleaded fuel91 octane (87 acceptable)
Maximum engine speed (RPM)6000
Horsepower/kW (@ RPM)310/231 @ 5200
Torque/N-m (lb.-ft. @ RPM)340/461 @ 4000
0 / 60 mph5.2 sec
0 / 100 mph12.7 sec
Capacities and Weights
Seating 4
Fuel tank (approx. gal./liters) 16.8/63.6
Curb weights, estimated (lbs./kg)3439/1560
Transmission Type 6-speed manual
RPO MN6
First gear 2.66
Second gear 1.78
Third gear 1.30
Fourth gear 1.00
Fifth gear 0.74
Sixth gear 0.50
Reverse gear 2.90
Final drive ratio 3.42
Fluid capacity (quarts/liters) 4.0/3.8
Clutch size (in./mm) 11.7/297
Member
Quote:
Originally posted by bobs
You're mistaking the Camaro's for the 6-cylinder RS model
Originally posted by bobs
You're mistaking the Camaro's for the 6-cylinder RS model

Almost a Member!
Quote:
Originally posted by Accomplice8
Ha ha, you're funny. These Camaros were fast cars the V6 model would of had bus lengths put on it.
Here is a quote from a Motor Trend test regarding the V8 version "On our final trip to the track, the manually-equipped Camaro ran a best 0 to 60 time of 5.2 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 108 miles-per-hour. But the slightly torquier automatic Trans Am ran an almost identical 0 to 60 time of 5.1 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 107 miles-per-hour."
13.5@107 compares very well to my C32. Throw a passenger in the Camaro and that makes for the slight advantage I had on the stock one. The heavily modded one would have likely crushed me with enough open, straight road.
Kevin
Edit: It was this one...
1999 Camaro Z28 Specifications
Dimensions
Exterior Coupe Wheelbase 101.1/2568
Length 193.5/4915
Width 74.1/1882
Height 51.2/1301
Engine 5.7L V8 SFI
RPO LS1
Displacement (cu. in./liters)346/5.7
Bore & stroke (in.)3.90 x 3.62(mm) 99 x 92
Compression ratio 10.1:1
Cylinder block materialcast-aluminum
Cylinder head materialcast-aluminum
Valvetrain configurationOHV
Valves per cylinder 2
Induction system SFI
Ignition direct, coil near plug
Lifters hydraulic roller
Cam drive chain
Coolant capacity (quarts/liters)13.58/12.85
Oil capacity (quarts/liters)5.5/5.2
Alternator rating (amps)102
Battery (SAE rating, cca)525
Recommended unleaded fuel91 octane (87 acceptable)
Maximum engine speed (RPM)6000
Horsepower/kW (@ RPM)310/231 @ 5200
Torque/N-m (lb.-ft. @ RPM)340/461 @ 4000
0 / 60 mph5.2 sec
0 / 100 mph12.7 sec
Capacities and Weights
Seating 4
Fuel tank (approx. gal./liters) 16.8/63.6
Curb weights, estimated (lbs./kg)3439/1560
Transmission Type 6-speed manual
RPO MN6
First gear 2.66
Second gear 1.78
Third gear 1.30
Fourth gear 1.00
Fifth gear 0.74
Sixth gear 0.50
Reverse gear 2.90
Final drive ratio 3.42
Fluid capacity (quarts/liters) 4.0/3.8
Clutch size (in./mm) 11.7/297
I know, I was just bugging you Originally posted by Accomplice8
Ha ha, you're funny. These Camaros were fast cars the V6 model would of had bus lengths put on it.
Here is a quote from a Motor Trend test regarding the V8 version "On our final trip to the track, the manually-equipped Camaro ran a best 0 to 60 time of 5.2 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 108 miles-per-hour. But the slightly torquier automatic Trans Am ran an almost identical 0 to 60 time of 5.1 seconds, and finished the 1/4 mile in 13.5 seconds at 107 miles-per-hour."
13.5@107 compares very well to my C32. Throw a passenger in the Camaro and that makes for the slight advantage I had on the stock one. The heavily modded one would have likely crushed me with enough open, straight road.
Kevin
Edit: It was this one...
1999 Camaro Z28 Specifications
Dimensions
Exterior Coupe Wheelbase 101.1/2568
Length 193.5/4915
Width 74.1/1882
Height 51.2/1301
Engine 5.7L V8 SFI
RPO LS1
Displacement (cu. in./liters)346/5.7
Bore & stroke (in.)3.90 x 3.62(mm) 99 x 92
Compression ratio 10.1:1
Cylinder block materialcast-aluminum
Cylinder head materialcast-aluminum
Valvetrain configurationOHV
Valves per cylinder 2
Induction system SFI
Ignition direct, coil near plug
Lifters hydraulic roller
Cam drive chain
Coolant capacity (quarts/liters)13.58/12.85
Oil capacity (quarts/liters)5.5/5.2
Alternator rating (amps)102
Battery (SAE rating, cca)525
Recommended unleaded fuel91 octane (87 acceptable)
Maximum engine speed (RPM)6000
Horsepower/kW (@ RPM)310/231 @ 5200
Torque/N-m (lb.-ft. @ RPM)340/461 @ 4000
0 / 60 mph5.2 sec
0 / 100 mph12.7 sec
Capacities and Weights
Seating 4
Fuel tank (approx. gal./liters) 16.8/63.6
Curb weights, estimated (lbs./kg)3439/1560
Transmission Type 6-speed manual
RPO MN6
First gear 2.66
Second gear 1.78
Third gear 1.30
Fourth gear 1.00
Fifth gear 0.74
Sixth gear 0.50
Reverse gear 2.90
Final drive ratio 3.42
Fluid capacity (quarts/liters) 4.0/3.8
Clutch size (in./mm) 11.7/297

Out Of Control!!
Accomplice8, nice story, now you know that Sometime's the chicken sometime's the feders

