M-Class (W163) Produced 1998-2005: ML 230, ML 320, ML 350, ML 400 CDI, ML 430, ML 500, ML 270 CDI

2003 C240 4matic or ML320?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-05-2002, 07:44 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Mr. White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 C240 4matic or ML320?

Have post this thread in the C's forum, just want to see different opinions from both side.

Thanks
Old 08-06-2002, 09:42 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
amb9800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 ML320
I think this really depends on your needs: if you want a functional 4matic sedan, the C240 is a nice choice. If you are willing to spend a couple thousand more and want an SUV with more space, the ML is the better choice.
Old 08-06-2002, 12:14 PM
  #3  
Almost a Member!
 
tcp_ML500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ditto,

Intended use will dictate which way you should go. We once looked at the C320 Wagon, but limited room in the back and cargo space directed us back to the M.

If you are talking about the C sedan VS the MClass, you really are looking at completely different uses and it will be difficult to rationalize the decision process as the two vehicles can't compare.
Old 08-06-2002, 01:30 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2010 ML550, 2010 E350 4M, 1966 Corvette Convt C2
Of the 2 there is no question that the M will do more for you. If you want a very nice all wheel drive sedan and have the budget to do so I would go with the E class 4Matic.
Old 08-06-2002, 04:25 PM
  #5  
Almost a Member!
 
shkeller55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lilburn, GA, USA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 ML320
Yes it depends on what you want to do with it. If you want an SUV that handles well *FOR AN SUV*, get the ML. But if you want something that's nimble and more tossable but with AWD, get the C class with 4Matic. I've had my ML for over 4 years and it's good at what I need it for, but it's not a sports car. I wouldn't consider tossing it around like you can a C class sedan.
Old 08-07-2002, 09:57 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Darkmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ML
Like everyone else has said, it depends on your intended use. I had a Nissan Pathfinder which worked well, and then I bought a E430 'cause my wife really wanted a sedan - I have 3 kids and guess what, the E still didn't provide the room the Pathfinder did for long trips with plenty of luggage. Even the Pathfinder with no 3rd row was becoming a big problem. I traded the Pathfinder for a ML430 with 3rd row and so far, it's proven to be a great bargain.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2003 C240 4matic or ML320?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 PM.