M-Class (W163) Produced 1998-2005: ML 230, ML 320, ML 350, ML 400 CDI, ML 430, ML 500, ML 270 CDI

Vote! 99 ML430 vs 00 ML320

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-05-2007, 09:40 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
pon97007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Vote! 99 ML430 vs 00 ML320

Hey guys!
I gonna buy 99 ML430 46000mile or 00 ML320 99000mile
Both are good condition, and price are almost same!

If I buy 99 ML430 will get pritty wheel and poor interior.
If 00 ML320, loose 17inch wheel but will get better intrior.


Please vote with your mile/gal and opinion.
Old 06-06-2007, 01:02 AM
  #2  
Member
 
E4///Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California,Washington,St.Croix
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very Slow Mercedes
I have 99 ML 430 with a bunch of upgrades, if you love the open road and road trips get the 430....care for i nicer place to sit the 320...I get about 17 MPG at freeway speed, about 14 around town...I think it is a 50 hp difference but the ML320 seem to need more repairs and more often, I can only assume the things wear out faster with less power pulling around more weight...no major repairs with 180,000 miles eventually it will need something and it will get replaced with a ML500/55 or 63 once they start coming off lease with no value....
Old 06-07-2007, 10:25 PM
  #3  
Member
 
SL-ML-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 MR-S daily driver, 1997 SL600 weekend fun, 1999 ML430 tow vehicle
99 Ml430

i've got a 99' ML430 with 91,000 miles on it, and I agree, the 320 is a good car, but the 430s extra power is nice and with similar mileage numbers, cant go wrong. i get around 20MPG @63MPH, and about 16.4 at 80, probably 16 around town

hope that helps you decide
SL-ML-C
Old 06-07-2007, 10:44 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
430 no question. mpg is about the same.
Old 06-12-2007, 07:07 AM
  #5  
Newbie
 
Dungaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: York, England
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML 320
Personally i'd go for the 99 ML430, theres only a year between it and there both prefacelift models so are susceptable to similar problems.

the low milage will be crucial and probably means the cars had a better life than the other one. will also help resale. However i would check to see if these miles are actually correct (if you are buying privately)

Finaly i have a 02 mL320 and recieve a shocking 18-22mpg and although the 430 is the larger engine it doesnt have to be worked as hard and gives much improved performance for only slightly reduced mpg. that said there both strong engines (the most reliable piece of the car..)

good luck
Old 06-12-2007, 11:08 AM
  #6  
Out Of Control!!
 
AsianML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2007 E63
I'll be the devil's advocate and say go for the 320. You said the 430 has a poor interior compared to the 320, and the only thing about the 320 you said you don't like is the lack of 17" wheels. You can always buy a set of 17" wheels afterward, aftermarket or OEM.
Old 06-12-2007, 11:09 AM
  #7  
Out Of Control!!
 
AsianML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2007 E63
Originally Posted by CoastLine
I have 99 ML 430 with a bunch of upgrades, if you love the open road and road trips get the 430....care for i nicer place to sit the 320...I get about 17 MPG at freeway speed, about 14 around town...I think it is a 50 hp difference but the ML320 seem to need more repairs and more often, I can only assume the things wear out faster with less power pulling around more weight...no major repairs with 180,000 miles eventually it will need something and it will get replaced with a ML500/55 or 63 once they start coming off lease with no value....
Not necessarily true with the MLs. The 430 is a stronger engine, but the 320 can hardly be considered a weakling. There are 98 320s around with hundreds of thousands of miles on them with the original engine and tranny.
Old 06-13-2007, 01:03 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
fkong777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 677
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
07 GL450, 91 NSX, 12 Prius
ML430 seems to me like a win-win situation. More power, less mileage and better wheels package.

You can always upgrade the seats from offering on Ebay or get nice seat covers thru autoleathers.com for about $750
Old 06-13-2007, 04:10 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,795
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
My mom used to have an 2003 ML350. It was a nice car, especially with the inspiration package. Although it was the "slowest" car in our garage, I could hardly consider the car a slouch. Power was always there when you needed it, it ran on regular for three years without so much as a hiccup, and returned very decent fuel economy for a heavy AWD SUV.

Now, lets compare the two cars you have listed. If the price is nearly the same, the go with the 430. Some reasons why:

1. Half the mileage. I am well aware that these motors can take much punishment and run seemingly forever when maintained. Still, here you have an option to go for a larger motor with literally half the wear.

2. The interior can be repaired. As fkong said, you can order online seat covers to replenish a worn interior - no big deal.

Hope this helps.
Old 06-16-2007, 06:25 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by HLG600
My mom used to have an 2003 ML350. It was a nice car, especially with the inspiration package. Although it was the "slowest" car in our garage, I could hardly consider the car a slouch. Power was always there when you needed it, it ran on regular for three years without so much as a hiccup, and returned very decent fuel economy for a heavy AWD SUV.

Now, lets compare the two cars you have listed. If the price is nearly the same, the go with the 430. Some reasons why:

1. Half the mileage. I am well aware that these motors can take much punishment and run seemingly forever when maintained. Still, here you have an option to go for a larger motor with literally half the wear.

2. The interior can be repaired. As fkong said, you can order online seat covers to replenish a worn interior - no big deal.

Hope this helps.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Go with the lower miles.
Also V8 > V6!!
Take that AsianML!LOL
Old 06-16-2007, 08:21 PM
  #11  
Out Of Control!!
 
AsianML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2007 E63
Originally Posted by Stiggs
Couldn't have said it better myself. Go with the lower miles.
Also V8 > V6!!
Take that AsianML!LOL
LOL.

It's been two weeks. What's the verdict!?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Vote! 99 ML430 vs 00 ML320



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.