Bilstein and H&R the combination that will make it or break it
Both Eibach and H&R have different listings when it comes to the actual lowering values. Since most of the people using H&R springs are complaining about the ride quality, I start digging out any info and help I can find. First I will start with the fact that the original springs are progressive and the b/s shocks made by KYB are softer than soft. Now the only available replacements are a non available Koni, the newer oem made by Sachs, one aftermarket Monroe and the too hard no comfort HD Bilsteins. I have the proof that no sport version of the Bilsteins are or will be available to this part of the world and if one will ask they should not be used with lowering springs. Back to the springs, they all state that will lower 1.25” and 1.4” while their TUV papers are clear about a lowering of 40 to 50 mm witch is as far as I now 40mm = 1.57” and 50mm = 2”. Also TUV papers for the H&R’s will show that “customer shocks can be use” if all the requirements are available : no bottom adjustable spring support, the presence of rubber stops…..which is actually nothing more than use your oem shocks and lower your truck, NO PROBLEM. Also the same paper shows that the spring is 340mm uncompressed and is a linear design. We all know that the newer revised shocks/springs are revalved and provide a nicer ride. Why very simple: Sachs makes quality shocks since the beginning of the days and the new units are totally different then original ones cause the spring now is liniar not progressive as the original was. Sow far so good but why we have problems with the lowering trucks why the rear becomes hard and bouncy and why people they throw all that into the shocks? I read all the posts about this and most of the complaining people will say use them in the front and keep oem shocks in the back and you will be happy. Why all this and for what? I took my truck apart more than 20 times and I talked to every person I could find with some experience and knowledge of the ML. I made my shocks fully adjustable so I can raise the back every .25” to a raise of 6” in total the only bad part I still have to take them out to do that. Finally I get a call from people that were heavily involved into racing the MLs. The story about my 3” drop is normal sort off since we leave in these dark age of European left over and giving the lower bid a chance to supply any manufacture ends up in a nightmare. To make this clear for everybody: when you use a different shock than oem please don’t mix and mach parts. From the old shock the only parts needed are the tops not the bottom spring plate as sow many of you did. The two parts are sitting exactly the same since Bilstein is TUV approved and is a direct replacement. Also use the bump stops provided with it. Now when it comes to springs go to the german web site of H&R and see that MLs they got a newer version of # 29497 . That is the damn problem; TUV papers are the ones that solved the mystery in my case. I have a 2000 ML55 and my original springs were progressive in design and both broken at the last bottom coil. When I installed the H&R’s I realize that I need no spring compressor to put them on, so the spring was way shorter. But hey “lowering springs right? Wrong. The part that I suppose to have provided was the old flat top spring which is only 40 mm longer and a different design than the new one. Talking to H&R in US I have mention a million times the part number on the spring and to their knowledge was right #29497 (R) is the one to use. NO. I have a newer part witch is linear design, 40mm shorter and no one could see that is just wrong. That is how I got my more than 3” lowering and the back is just stiff like rock. I like progressive springs, if you drive by yourself they are really comfy, that is the main reason for the last 20 years I used only H&R. Don’t take me wrong I never said any bad thinks about Eibach, there are just not my pot of coffee. So now I will see if I can find my 29497 – 2 and let you now.
I have yet to install my Bilstein HDs and H&R lowering springs as I need to remove most of my stereo system to do the install but from what it sounds like... you are saying NO GO?
From what you are saying is that the flat springs are going to be WAY too low and not the 1.5" drop they claimed it would be but closer to 3"
Ill get those measurements for you today, but do you have any pictures of the work you have done on the suspension to help explain what you are talking about?
the front is 17.25" to the center of the amg wheel
Trending Topics
And dont you need to grab the top of the shock towers from inside the rear hatch area? I have a sub enclosure on the right side of my ML... I cant get at the top of the shock tower unless I remove my fiberglassed enclosure... but if you say I can do the install from the outside of the car then by all means give me a how to...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Let’s start from the beginning. Raise the back, use floor jacks I will say min 3” from the tires to the ground. Remove both wheels than have a beer. Now you have to remove the wheel housing lining but I have done it with that in place (6 or 7 10mm plastic nuts, than pull from inside and play with it a bit). Look at the shock and to the left and the right you have to take out first the plastic cap (a little screwdriver will help). Now have I mentioned if you have bid hands pay a guy to do it? You have to use a 13mm ratcheting wrench like a GearWrench Ratcheting Combination Wrench (that’s what I use). Make shore is not a flexible one. After you manage to take all 3 out, one in the front as towards you and two in the back toward opposite side (as a triangle).13mm will help you to remove the link bar between stabilizer bar (sway bar) and lower control arm. Use a 21mm socket and a 21 wrench (inside the cutout is a nut) remove the bolts between the lower control arm and the sub frame. Now 18 mm socket will remove the lower strut assemble nut in the middle of the lower control arm. Lower the control arm from inside so will hang on the lower ball joint .Remove the suspension strut and using a spring compressor remove the spring (nut on the top is 17mm and watch the order of the bushings). Install your new spring over the shock; use the top parts from the old one. Put all back in the reverse order. Torque specs are: link rod to torsion bar 28 NM, lower control arm to the sub frame 135 NM, strut top nuts to the body 20 NM, lower strut nut to control arm 85 NM. I will post the WIS files also. Let me know if you need more info. They are Office Document Imaging files if any of you can convert them will be great but for now that is the only way for me. I have to make them a jpg or other so i can post them and i don't know how ???
I know that there are two access panels built into the panels that allow you to grab the three bolts from the top of the shock but I have a sub enclosure built over one of those access panels so its not possible to access them... Ill try your way tomorrow...
AND with new bilstien HD shocks in the front... my new height is 19.5" from center of wheel to fender flayer... I didnt have time to do the rears today, so only the fronts
I still don't understand why anyone would want to lower an ML as to do so negates any off-roading ability. Might as well remove the transfer case too! When lowered they look more like a van.
In any case, toclk43 is correct. Height is governed by torsion bars and springs. The body has been completely sealed to maintain the ML's low NVH levels, and to maintain structural integrity even when there is body damage or rust. The suspension is tugged into the separate ladder chassis, so to gain access for spring/shock replacement you'll need to hoist the entire car.
Mohawk... lowering it also increases its drivability as it makes it an entirely different animal ON the road. Im not sure what type of ML you have but as a 55 owner I can assure you that the ML is as FUN to drive as it is capable as an offroader. The tourque it has makes it VERY fun off the line and its ability as a highway cruiser is great
I went to napa auto parts for an oil filter for my C230 a few months ago, and they gave me the wrong filter...twice...Their computer tells them what part is for which car...I dunno why, but it's like Napa swears their parts will work, and when you bring the part back to them, they tell you "well it should work" or "gotta go to Mercedes for that"...



