ML quality problems...
You are very lucky you didnt buy a Range Rover though - I have friends with them and they break regularly, the engines and transmissions are poor (they are very very old design), and inside panel fit is not good. They fixed the problems by having the car sent to specialist tuner OverFinch who put a 6.7Liter engine in, removed *all* the panel work, put the latest interior in it and added extra fixing, dampening etc, and best of all put huge brakes on it - now its as quick as the ML500 - see www.overfinch.co.uk
(the door seals were rubbing against the doors wrong and they were replaced and all is well!). I looked at the ML500 at the auto show and find all the panels very tight, and upon slamming the tailgate there was minimal rattling. I really would like to upgrade but im an in the process of getting a new C240 or 325i. I would say go for the ML500 and if there are problems (which i HIGHLY doubt), the dealer will always fix it. Clair in boston,ma does!
Although I would have preferred fewer trips to the dealer for warrantee service, overall I’m quite pleased with the ML430 and will probably upgrade to the ML500 soon. I use the ML mostly for long trips, or when I need more than two seats. Most of my trips involve some driving on unimproved roads and trails. I took a trip late last summer from San Diego to Alaska in the ML430 and I can’t think of another vehicle that would have been better. The ML offers a great combination of on and off-road capability.
I’ve owned three Land Cruisers (91, 93, 98) in the past and find the ML430 more appropriately sized for my application and much more fun to drive than the ’98 V8 Land Cruiser it replaced. I actually prefer the size of the earlier model Land Cruisers to the new V8 models. If you need the third row of seats, the Land Cruiser or LX470 is probably a better option than the M-Class. I had fewer problems with the Land Cruisers than the ML, but the service experience with Mercedes is muuuch superior to that offered by Toyota. I think I would buy the LX470 over the Land Cruiser just for the upgraded service environment.
In my opinion there are only two suitable SUV alternatives -- the M-Class or the LX470/Landcruiser. If you don’t need the size of the Toyota/Lexus then I would recommend the M-Class. Of course, if you need a more serious off-roader, then the G500 becomes the vehicle of choice.
hey vanos... i have a 2000 430 and im not afraid to admit, that i am very disappointed with the quality of the car. i have 26k miles and since day 1 i heard creaks in the interior, right front windows squeeking, door panels rattleing etc. not to mention the car overall just doesnt feel like a REAL benz. my parents have owned the big bodies before and they are the real deal. i had a choice of this or a range rover and i kinda wish i chose the 4.6. i opted for the 430 for it's performance over the rr's. im gonna give it to my wife and may get into an e class...
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




.... Now where is my screwdriver ?? Got to go break some stuff.....
One annoying problem was the door locks...they would keep going up and down up and down and sometimes wouldn't automatically lock, etc.
There are a LOT of squeaks and rattles in this car. Our E320 and even my CL-S is quieter than the ML...
any ideas mbtech?
does most dealers know about these problems and are they aware of how to fix them?


