M-Class (W164) Produced 2006-2011: ML280CDI, ML320CDI, ML420CDI, ML350, ML500, ML550

ML mpg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-27-2008, 02:48 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
c240PORTUGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML mpg?

i'm thinking of trading in the wife's c240 for an ML. trying to decide between the 350 and the 320CDI. i currenty have a vw TDI and diesel is expensive, but i still do ok w/ the 46mpg average. what mileage are you ML owners getting?
Old 06-27-2008, 04:05 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
dgiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 898
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
His 2019 RAM Cummins Turbo Diesel Laramie; Her's 2007 ML320 CDI P3; Mine BMW R1200R
Gotta envy the mileage of your TDI.

For my ML, the highest seen on the highway, driving 55MPH or so is 33.7MPG average.
If I step up to 70-75 MPH, same route, it drops to 27MPG average.
In the City, late for a meeting or enjoying the turbo, I can get it down to 22MPG.
If I am stuck in heavy Chicago traffic, (2 hrs and only 30 miles travelled) I can see 19 MPG
Hope the info helps.
Go Diesel.
Old 06-27-2008, 06:50 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
uhaveit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 ML 320 CDI
Although I like the mileage of your TDI but I still think VW diesels are still unrefined and lot noisy . I hope the new 2009 Jetta diesels are better and comparable to Mercedes diesels.

I have around 3000 miles in my ML320 and the highest I got is 28 on highway driving mostly between 67-72 mph. Careful combination drive yields around 22 mpg.

Too much stop and go will result in poor mileage around 16-17,which makes gas engine a better choice. If you travel mostly highway diesel is a better choice.

I previously owned a R350 and the max mileage I got was 23.5 and the low mileage was 15.Averaging 19.5 in combination driving .

Overall you get around 10-15% better mileage with diesels.


Originally Posted by c240PORTUGA
i'm thinking of trading in the wife's c240 for an ML. trying to decide between the 350 and the 320CDI. i currenty have a vw TDI and diesel is expensive, but i still do ok w/ the 46mpg average. what mileage are you ML owners getting?
Old 06-27-2008, 08:40 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Nickerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML350 '06
Yep...Hwy around 23-24 mpg for me, otherwise, according to the computer, I'm averaging 17.4mpg overall for 24,000 miles so far.
Old 06-27-2008, 11:25 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
MB Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Suzuki Burgman Executive
drove from from hendrick motors in nc to chicago in my ml its about 750 miles and only used about a tank and quarter in my ml500 and i was going 75 set on the cruise control. i dont want to talk about city milage because its so sad i laugh
Old 06-28-2008, 12:53 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
BruNo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: PHILIPPINES
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07' ML350
my ML averages 12mpg in city driving. the best i had was 16mpg, the worse 9mpg. its a little thirstier than the C240 but its much much faster.
Old 06-28-2008, 09:26 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Floobydust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,028
Received 131 Likes on 100 Posts
2018 GLE350, 2014 G550, 2000 SL500, 1980 TR8, 1995 E320 Cabriolet
In my ML550 I get 18 - 20 pretty consistently in mixed highway/suburban driving. It drops to 16 - 18 during the wretched New England winter. The new 550 engine seems to be more fuel efficient than the older 500 engine.
Old 06-28-2008, 10:52 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
Brian_74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 ML550; 2005 SLK55
Originally Posted by Floobydust
In my ML550 I get 18 - 20 pretty consistently in mixed highway/suburban driving. It drops to 16 - 18 during the wretched New England winter. The new 550 engine seems to be more fuel efficient than the older 500 engine.
+1
On the freeway at 80mph for 250mi trip with the AC blasting, I've averaged 20-22 mpg. Phenomenal efficiency for the power
Old 06-28-2008, 02:54 PM
  #9  
Member
 
CrazyDonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 ML320 CDI
on my trip to and from Birmingham with a week old 08 ML 320 i was getting 23-24 with cruise set at 80. if i dropped it down to 70-75 when i got to slow cars it would go up 1 or 2.

driving to and from the golf course today in the city i was getting 20 driving like an old lady.
Old 06-29-2008, 01:06 PM
  #10  
Member
 
dante&david's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Thessaloniki, GREECE & Tirana, ALBANIA
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From 2006 ML 320 CDI - from 2009 Audi Q5 S-Line 3.0 TDI DSG - from 2011 Range Rover Sport TDV6 HSE
DIESEL certainly!

I did 61000 km with average 11,9 ltr/100 km.

I do, when driving calm, even 8 ltr/100 km.

When I speed a lot I do 12-13 ltr/100 km

Diesel in Greece, where I live costs 1.25-1.3 Euro per liter.

-------------------------------------------------------

If I compare it with the benzine consumpion and costs:

With the VW Touareg 3.0, similar engine, my last SUV, I think I was a dump to use that car. I hardly did 4 km with 1 liter with that car. The car was burning more fuel even in low speeds! Not to speak about accelerations or speeding in long trips over 150 km/hour! I hardly did about 400 km with 105 litres of benzol!

Today with my ML I do easily from 800-950 km (in proportion with how I drive) with only one tank with 95 litres of diesel! Anyone can do the comments on his own! The diesel engines provide more torque, lot's of power, are more silent inside the cabine (100% proven), you have your horse power in a longer secuence and from very low rpm (in benzine engines you need to burn your engine or your ears in order to have your horse power), you can doubble or nearly tripple your autonomy, and you certainly can save a lot of money for the fuel.

I strongly advice to you to go for a diesel!

If you do not care for the consumption at all, at all, then just take whatever you feel ok! But if the consumption is one of your issues - certainly diesel!

The ML 350 will give you almost same joy in riding but you will pay more then doubble for the fuel for the same kilometres! This is as true as the light of the day!

Last edited by dante&david; 06-29-2008 at 01:09 PM.
Old 06-29-2008, 11:32 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alewifebp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,348
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 BMW 550i
Originally Posted by Brian_74
+1
On the freeway at 80mph for 250mi trip with the AC blasting, I've averaged 20-22 mpg. Phenomenal efficiency for the power
That's quite nice with the extra power. On a single long highway trip from NJ to DC, I achieved about 22-24 MPG, and I can maybe get 22 MPG on shorter pure highway trips. However, with my mix of a lot of local and some highway, I average about 15-16 MPG.
Old 06-30-2008, 01:59 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
mr.iridium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Land Rover LR3
I just crossed the 3,000K mark and MPG from day of purchase has been 15.4mpg on my ML350. That is city driving with two different drivers behind the wheel.

I was hoping for better when I traded in my LR3 for the ml350. The LR3 averaged 14mpg but it was much heavier, V8 engine, and larger overall.

saving grace is we don't do that much driving.
Old 07-13-2008, 03:16 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AWDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MILFORD,CT
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E36M3 race car/Ferrari F355 GTS/1973 Mini 1275GT/Fiat Abarth/ML63/SLK55
hey guys with the cdi pl provide feedback if possible. i would like to know the initial gas consumption on startup- say for the first 2 miles.

my wife does very short trips and gets horrible mileage as our gas vehicles never warm up. now i need to tow a race car i'm thinking of getting rid of her jeep in favour of a ml 320 cdi, which i would borrow on occasion.

thanks.
Old 07-13-2008, 05:04 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
birjuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 ML350
Hi I have an 06 ML350. I live in the city and most of the time I average about 15mpg (range is 12.5-17 depending on how heavy my foot is that day and if I use the A/C). In the highway it maxes out at like 22.
Old 07-13-2008, 09:48 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
dgiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 898
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
His 2019 RAM Cummins Turbo Diesel Laramie; Her's 2007 ML320 CDI P3; Mine BMW R1200R
Originally Posted by AWDman
hey guys with the cdi pl provide feedback if possible. i would like to know the initial gas consumption on startup- say for the first 2 miles.

my wife does very short trips and gets horrible mileage as our gas vehicles never warm up. now i need to tow a race car i'm thinking of getting rid of her jeep in favour of a ml 320 cdi, which i would borrow on occasion.

thanks.
On a short trip, say under 5 miles, you wont see that much of a difference. It will still be slightly better with the diesel though, maybe by 2-3 MPG. Drive 20 miles, and it gets better, say 6+ MPG. Cruise the highway and you will smile. If you are going to tow, 400 ft. pounds of diesel torque will always come in handy.
Old 07-14-2008, 02:24 PM
  #16  
Member
 
Flubadub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 132
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
2017 GLC300, 13 PorscheC4S, 12 Porsche Cayman S
Originally Posted by dgiturbo
On a short trip, say under 5 miles, you wont see that much of a difference. It will still be slightly better with the diesel though, maybe by 2-3 MPG. Drive 20 miles, and it gets better, say 6+ MPG. Cruise the highway and you will smile. If you are going to tow, 400 ft. pounds of diesel torque will always come in handy.
My experience agrees. Maybe he should get the wife a bike or scooter!!
Old 07-14-2008, 02:46 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
nantucketsleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1992 500E, 2006 E500, 2007 GL 450
Originally Posted by Floobydust
In my ML550 I get 18 - 20 pretty consistently in mixed highway/suburban driving. It drops to 16 - 18 during the wretched New England winter. The new 550 engine seems to be more fuel efficient than the older 500 engine.
Your mileage is identical to what I get in my GL450. My '06 E500 gets over 27 mpg on the highway and 18-19 around town. From what I see on the 211 forum the mileage for an E550 is about the same.
Old 07-17-2008, 06:37 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AWDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MILFORD,CT
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E36M3 race car/Ferrari F355 GTS/1973 Mini 1275GT/Fiat Abarth/ML63/SLK55
Ok thanks for the feedback guys. as it turns out a local dealer had a 07 320 cdi so i test drove it. the vehicle was not totally cold even tho i asked - i observed 20-22 mpg before getting to hiway. on hiway it got 25-27 but there was tons of traffic and i couldnt get clear stretches to go over 70 mph.

i saw the 08 ml550 and boy that's a beautiful truck. the amg kit does wonders for it appearance- making it much more masculine. i like.

i went onto http://www.fueleconomy.gov and noted that there was not much diff between the 350 vs the 550 engines. in fact the 550 seems pretty efficient. coupled with discounts available this may be the way to go for me......i would love the power of the ml63 but don't think i could stomach the mpg. btw i don't like the 09s styling.

and no kidding i'm looking for a aprilia rs50.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: ML mpg?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM.