Nexen Tires
So...never buying those again. Tread life is way too short.
Anyways, I had the ML towed 78mi to Little Rock to the ONLY store in Memphis and Little Rock that had any type of 265/45/20 tires in stock (well, MB Little Rock had non-run flat tires, but they were $1805 for a set of 4...not that desperate).
Turns out the only available tires were Nexen N'fera RU5 tires - which I've never heard of. Korean tire company with a 65k mi warranty on a set of non-run flat all seasons. $621 out the door.
I was intending to replace the tires with the Pirelli Scorpion Plus version (non run-flat) at around $970, but I'm going to see how these turn out.
Just thought I'd share. Will follow up after about 10 or 20k mi.
Run-flats on these MLs are...not recommended...
While I am not an advocate of run-flats or a brand snob, *DECENT* SUV tires from Continental, Pirelli or Michelin can be had for well under $1K US. Tire Rack has the Scorpion Verde Plus with a 740 treadwear rating that you mentioned for $835 (actually $775 after a mail-in rebate). You don't drive a Hundai Santa Fe - so why would you put cheap Korean junk (which are actually made in China) on your premium SUV seeing as the tires are all that keep those 5,000 lbs in contact with the road?
I called every single tire dealer in a 200mi span - the Auto Tire Distributor Warehouse (supplies Firestone, Discount Tire and a few others) was the only place with matching tire sizes and weight rating to get me safely back to Arizona besides the MB dealership. And it was these Nexens - $600 for a quick fix was a no-brainer. MB Little Rock told me frankly the Nexens were the better option in my situation. These were a quick fix.
After about 10k miles these will be taken off and replaced with a new 255/45/19 wheel and tire set with Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus tires when I place the order...which is what I intended anyways.
Thought I would share feedback on some cheap tires with the forum. You may be right, or you may be wrong. Either way, it is free (and friendly) feedback.
I too am sort of curious to know how they'll fare... but I wouldn't expect much and I'd keep a close eye on them. Not only do they harden and ride like crap after a while, but they also crack and I've seen several cars with them come in the shop with sidewall bulges (cut carcass in the sidewall) where the owners swear they've never driven within three feet of a pothole, let alone actualy hit one. Just a word of caution.
Yeah, the run-flats are not a good option, and buying tires from MB is a rip-off... but you can get actual MO rated Pirellis or Contis (IIRC the MOs have an extra set of plies and more rigid shoulders) from any half-decent tire retailer for half the price they charge at the dealership.
I called every single tire dealer in a 200mi span - the Auto Tire Distributor Warehouse (supplies Firestone, Discount Tire and a few others) was the only place with matching tire sizes and weight rating to get me safely back to Arizona besides the MB dealership. And it was these Nexens - $600 for a quick fix was a no-brainer. MB Little Rock told me frankly the Nexens were the better option in my situation. These were a quick fix.
After about 10k miles these will be taken off and replaced with a new 255/45/19 wheel and tire set with Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Plus tires when I place the order...which is what I intended anyways.
Thought I would share feedback on some cheap tires with the forum. You may be right, or you may be wrong. Either way, it is free (and friendly) feedback.
If your tires were just worn, I would have waited to get the right tires.
Trending Topics
The Good:
- Quieter on rough asphalt and very quiet on smooth highway sections
- They absorb small road imperfections better than the run-flats (unfair comparison though)
- Stopping distances have not changed, though I'm a pretty conservative driver.
- Cornering is just okay - Pirellis encouraged more speed through a corner and didn't really roll. With Active Curve, the sidewall roll is noticeable on the Nexens.
The Bad / Questionable:
- 3 of the 4 tires required more weights than the Pirellis to balance out and they still have a slightly noticeable throw between between 60-65; however, I have not checked the round on my wheels to rule out a bent wheel.
- Sidewall roll is pronounced which leads me to think a hard hit on a pothole might actually damage the tire, though I have yet to hit a big pothole.
- Had to stuff a space-saver spare in the back...B&O precludes using the spare well
Overall: Not bad. With very little wear, I have little to complain about. Though any new tire will be improvement over a worn out set of run-flats. The number of weights to balance the tires does make me question the consistency in manufacturing. More useful feedback will actually be at the 10k mile point when they've worn in.
Caveats:
1 - I live in AZ: Dry, flat roads, and temps in the 60s-70s; potholes are not common, though sharp linear cracks and bigger heaves are common
2 - My priorities: quiet, comfortable, predictable (don't need the best grip, but enough to be predictable and safe), and at least 30k miles of safe use
3 - I'm not a spirited driver - I drive for comfort; mostly 2-3hr highway runs at 80mph
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
You said the old tires "fell apart"... did you ever completely lose air pressure in any of them? If yes, then you could have bent a rim fairly easily. If you didn't and the old tires have always been properly inflated, I highly doubt that you've bent one of the OEM MB 20" rims unless you've hit a massive pothole (which would have cut the tire sidewall in the process). Those are pretty solid and with the 20s there's enough sidewall height (air) beteween the metal and the pavement.
Unless your tires are quite under-inflated, the lack of lateral rigidity is due to the absence of additional reinforcing belts that are present on all of the MO tires. Yes, the extra wheel weights and vibration at speed could be due to quality issues (again assuming that you haven't bent a rim), however it can often be corrected by road-force balancing. Having them road-force balanced at a shop that has the equipment will likely cost you an extra $80-100 in labour though, but you may want to try it. They can also visually check the wheels for run-off (see if they're bent) at the same time while they're being spun. Good luck - and please let us know how things work out.
As for Pirelli's Chinese ownership, it's no different from India's ownership of Land Rover and Jaguar for example, or China's ownership of Volvo. I am talking about a specific cheap tire manufacturer whose tires are crap regardless of where they're made, although some plants may make slightly better or worse products than others. Nexen opened a second plant in Korea a couple of years ago that apparently produces somewhat better tires. It also has nothing to do with them being Korean either - Kumho and Hankook are also Korean tire companies, but their tires are at least an order of magnitude better than the Nexens. Both make decent tires - I've used Kumho Victoracers for a number of years on my various P-car track rats, and MB now uses Kumho tires as OE equipment on the G-Wagen.
---
They also mention OEM supplier - which searching indicates is Kia Optima / Soul...on pissedconsumer.com. Not exactly a good thing.
If I wind up in a ditch, I'll make sure to share...
These also flat spot very easily. I garage park every night and feel them rounding out in the morning.
Details:
After 4 spin balances and 1 road force balance it turns out 2 of the tires have a 'hop' between 62-68; had them spin the tire on the wheel with the road force machine and re-balance, but the two tires won't balance out. Tested the run out on the wheels to rule out a bent wheel.
So, after 7k miles, these Nexens are coming off and the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Plus tires are going on.
Main problem was vibration - both from flat spotting overnight and the tire hop mentioned above. These are just not up to snuff - problems point to manufacturing inconsistency and an inadequate compound that can't deal with the weight of an ML.
No cupping or any other safety related problems I could see, but I can't stand a shaky ride in a Merc. I drive too many highway miles for that.
Details:
After 4 spin balances and 1 road force balance it turns out 2 of the tires have a 'hop' between 62-68; had them spin the tire on the wheel with the road force machine and re-balance, but the two tires won't balance out. Tested the run out on the wheels to rule out a bent wheel.
So, after 7k miles, these Nexens are coming off and the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Plus tires are going on.
Main problem was vibration - both from flat spotting overnight and the tire hop mentioned above. These are just not up to snuff - problems point to manufacturing inconsistency and an inadequate compound that can't deal with the weight of an ML.
No cupping or any other safety related problems I could see, but I can't stand a shaky ride in a Merc. I drive too many highway miles for that.
The salesmen never tell SUV and truck buyers they will need a set of tires every year, brakes every two years, and more fuel than they ever imagined haha.
A friend of mine bought a Raptor and traded it after 6 mths, $8K in fuel, and $3K in tires!




I think it interesting that Hyundai Sante FE owners get Michelin and new GLEs come with Coopers. So much for name brand tires on Mercedes
Always Monday morning quarterbacks around
The tires on any car are the ONLY thing that connects the car to the road, and the difference in tire quality is often the difference between you and your family getting home safe and disaster. I sincerely hope you or a family member don't end up in the hospital or worse because you in your infinite wisdom decided that saving $150 on your awesome NEXEN tires was worth more than their well-being.
I sold this ML550 to another forum member here at 175k miles last year with two sets of wheels and a spare set of tires (3 tire sets in total). 2 sets of Michelin tires and a set of Continental tires.
I’d like to think that sharing high mileage experience after going through over 8 sets of tires is worth something - even if it is about a set of inexpensive tires.
I believe Nexen tires improved in quality since this batch I had. I wouldn’t really take issue with using them now. Wouldn’t be my first choice considering Conti or Pirelli sets can be had for $8-900 for a set - which is a negligible difference from the Nexen set at $700.
The Continental LX25 tires I last used were pretty great. They balanced easily and looked nice. As were the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Plus sets. The Pirellis just had a tendency to get pretty noisy at the end of their tread life. That was the only reason I switched away from them.
The Michelin Latitude tires were a bit soft (19” only), but were long lasting and very comfortable.
A set Michelin x-ice 2 winter tires were phenomenal in 3ft snow storms in NY - and were surprisingly quiet in non-snow conditions. Would absolutely buy those again if I lived in the snow belt.
Tires are important - so buy what makes sense for you.
And don’t mind the pettiness of others judging decisions they don’t understand…





