Maybach (W240) Produced 2002-2012

Maybach 57S or S65 AMG? Which would you prefer and why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 12 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 05-17-2006, 08:08 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
patrick_y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2006 E55 and 2002 E320
Originally Posted by NY C32
x3 now

I can say I've never driven/been driven in either one and only sat in the Maybach 62. IMO, aside from knowing how much the Maybach costs and what it, I don't really care much for it.

Here in NYC, there are several chauffer driven Maybachs and very few people stop and look. The RR on the onther hand, people always stop and stare. The car has a presence that commands attention

Not to compare, my parents have an old RR Silver Shadow LWB at their house in MI that sits in the garage for the most part to match the grand old English tudor. The car drives like crap but its very comfy and quiet in the back seat.
Yes, the ultimate house accessory, a Rolls Royce. It's almost as important as furniture! And it's cheaper than most art (compared to the Lichienstein I wish to acquire).
Old 05-27-2006, 01:33 PM
  #27  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 9,984
Received 3,171 Likes on 1,977 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
The RR vs. Maybach comparison is an old one, but I thought I still add a few points.
1. Strangely enough, not only is the Maybach in the RR league, it has been widely recognized as being the more luxurious of the two and simply being the best car to be chauffeured in (the 62). This used to be the longtime RR stronghold.

2. The Maybach was designed to be a background car. It was also designed as a long distance business cruiser and that goal has certainly been accomplished. When it comes to the way a car looks is in the end a question of personal taste...
For the primary target audience, attracting attention is normally considered a negative, but I guess some people are desperate; for that the Phantom is unbeatable.

3. Price. I am always amazed by the comments of many on the board that a $300k-$400k car should perfect in every little aspect. While the Maybach and the Rolls Royce are very well built (due to their German ownership), that is usually quite the opposite.
Rolls Royces and Bentleys used to virtually break in front of your eyes. Not just electrical, but mechanical as well.
Same with sports cars; Ferrari, Lamborghini and Aston Martin have been just about the most unreliable cars money can buy.

Ultimately, the price is primarily driven by low volume and only to a smaller extend by materials or manufacturing methods. R&D costs need to be recouped. Simple as that...

Wolfman
Old 12-14-2006, 01:09 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
This thread is 10 months old....I've had a chance to spend a little time in a 57S (being chauffeured, that is) and with the advent of the new S65, it would seem the decision would now be even tougher....W221 S65....or....57S?

Which would you select?
Old 12-14-2006, 09:26 PM
  #29  
Out Of Control!!
 
55fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 14,212
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
00 MB ML55, 91 Toyota Supra Turbo(sold), 06 E500(gone), 03 BMW M3
65 all the way
Old 12-15-2006, 12:20 AM
  #30  
Newbie
 
rnds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course I would choose a 57 S over a MB S65 ...but I would much rather own a EWB Phantom over a Maybach any day. Maybach is a very nice car ...but that is not enough really. Lets be honest here, why do people buy Maybachs and Rolls-Royces? ...primarily they are bought as status symbols ..and most buyers for these cars are almost certainly self-made American, Russian, or Chinese business people -- not old European aristocrats like the marketing people would like us to imagine. There really is not much that is aristocratic about either of these cars -- they epitomize nouveau-riche taste. The S 65 is also a car for the newly-rich.

Anyone who criticizes the Phantom for being too "flashy" is seriously misunderstanding why people buy these types of cars in the first place -- they are supposed to make a statement, inspire awe in others ...and BTW, the Maybach is hardly inconspicuous when it dives past you on the street.



The Phantom has a true sense of style, which is something the Maybach seems to lack a bit. I love these hidden 12" TV screens.


Last edited by rnds; 12-15-2006 at 12:29 AM.
Old 01-12-2007, 12:08 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
I don't see the point of the 57-platform. Why spend all that money yet lose out on rear seat space for relatively little more? Now the 62S is something to covet.
Old 01-17-2007, 09:29 AM
  #32  
Newbie
 
rnds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is quite true Carl ...but the 57 does look better proportioned. The reclining seats in the 62 are really fun ...but I doubt I would ever use them.
Old 01-17-2007, 11:55 AM
  #33  
Out Of Control!!
 
AsianML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 E63
Originally Posted by rnds
Of course I would choose a 57 S over a MB S65 ...but I would much rather own a EWB Phantom over a Maybach any day. Maybach is a very nice car ...but that is not enough really. Lets be honest here, why do people buy Maybachs and Rolls-Royces? ...primarily they are bought as status symbols ..and most buyers for these cars are almost certainly self-made American, Russian, or Chinese business people -- not old European aristocrats like the marketing people would like us to imagine. There really is not much that is aristocratic about either of these cars -- they epitomize nouveau-riche taste. The S 65 is also a car for the newly-rich.

Anyone who criticizes the Phantom for being too "flashy" is seriously misunderstanding why people buy these types of cars in the first place -- they are supposed to make a statement, inspire awe in others ...and BTW, the Maybach is hardly inconspicuous when it dives past you on the street.



The Phantom has a true sense of style, which is something the Maybach seems to lack a bit. I love these hidden 12" TV screens.

You are obviously generalizing and making assumptions based on stereotypes.

omg, there are people that like the discreet looks of the Maybach.
Old 01-17-2007, 03:41 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Soon2bMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 C300W4 Sport, 2006 Honda CBR600F4i
i have had the chance to drive both, the 57s has more power, the RR doesnt, and i dont like how big it feels when you are driving it, you can be doing 120 in the 57s and actually control the car.
Old 01-24-2007, 11:14 PM
  #35  
Newbie
 
rnds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AsianML
You are obviously generalizing and making assumptions based on stereotypes.

omg, there are people that like the discreet looks of the Maybach.
Of course I was generalizing -- I can't possibly be expected to make an analysis of every single buyer of these vehicles.....

....and if you have ever seen a Maybach on the street you will know it is not as discreet as you suggest ....everyone notices it.
Old 01-25-2007, 04:39 PM
  #36  
Out Of Control!!
 
AsianML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 E63
Originally Posted by rnds
Of course I was generalizing -- I can't possibly be expected to make an analysis of every single buyer of these vehicles.....

....and if you have ever seen a Maybach on the street you will know it is not as discreet as you suggest ....everyone notices it.
Due to the size, yes. Probably not due to the styling.
Old 01-28-2007, 12:42 AM
  #37  
Newbie
 
rnds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AsianML
Due to the size, yes. Probably not due to the styling.
That is most probably true.

Neither of these cars is particularly beautiful ...but do you not agree the Rolls-Royce is more dramatic and interesting?
Old 01-28-2007, 09:03 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZedStyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Youngtimer
Originally Posted by rnds
Neither of these cars is particularly beautiful ...but do you not agree the Rolls-Royce is more dramatic and interesting?
for sure... maybachs are great, but you would be hard-pressed to find something more imposing than a roller in your rear view mirror...

Old 01-29-2007, 11:29 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
crb49's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 424
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1985 380 SL 2001 SL 500 2007 E350 Sport 2008 T & C Ltd.
First time I've ever seen cleavage on a Rolls...

Let me think........Yeah, I like it. it kind of grows on you.

Last edited by crb49; 01-29-2007 at 11:31 AM.
Old 01-31-2007, 09:54 AM
  #40  
Member
 
MotorWerkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 146
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
E280 W211, X5 F15, X6 F16
Originally Posted by crb49
First time I've ever seen cleavage on a Rolls...

Let me think........Yeah, I like it. it kind of grows on you.
yeah ... cleavage .... drool
Old 12-17-2010, 07:52 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
I dont't know why, but I've been dreaming about a Maybach 57 again. A truly bespoke vehicle, and leftover 2009s can be had at bargain prices. My heart desires a 57s, perhaps a Zeppelin edition.
Old 08-15-2011, 08:41 PM
  #42  
Member
 
Whufc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E250 Cabriolet
Im so happy I can say Ive been driven in a Maybach around New York at Christmas (1-2 Years ago) And it was beautiful, It hurt to get out of it :-(
But, Im going back to New York this christmas and Im staying at the same hotel, so fingers crossed!

Also, that hotel, previously Had a RR Phantom, and sold it for the Maybach! The driver says he prefers the maybach!

So, I'd go maybach everyday!
Old 09-30-2011, 03:44 PM
  #43  
Member
 
Limen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG, CL65 AMG, S8, S6, E30 M3, Z3MC
No question in my mind. Maybach.

My dad has a Bach, and one of my buddies has the RR.
Old 07-28-2012, 11:57 PM
  #44  
Newbie
 
Diamond mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sl65,s550 4matic,gl320,e350 4matic,s600
Questions about the maybach

Hello all- I'm new to the forum, and this is my first post, so I hope it's the correct area in which to ask my questions. I'm thinking of trading in / selling my '07 s600 towards an 04 maybach 57. The closest Maybach dealer to me is an hour away. My main questions are-

1) any specific maintenance problems on the 04s for which I should look out?
2) are these things maintenance nightmares? I've looked at the car faxes of a few and it seems as though hey may be a little persnickety.
3) can I take it to my regular MBz dealer for maintenance work?
4) I'm 6'5" and long in the torso. How is the headroom relative to an s class?

Thanks in advance for any help you can offer me.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 12 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Maybach 57S or S65 AMG? Which would you prefer and why?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 PM.