valve train geometry
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: earth
e
valve train geometry
welcome all techno freaks
my 2.4 v6 generates 170bhp which = naught. my best guess is that the cylinder head ports or valves are restrictive. Anyone hauled the heads of a 240? if so, are the ports or valves to small.
similarly how close are the water channels to the ports and valves. how big a valve could i go. lastly whats the combustion design like. is it a fuel friendly anti power 'D shape' job?
and.. what are the cam profiles like in terms of duration and lift. Are the standard cams to mild...
whats the weakest link
abtex
my 2.4 v6 generates 170bhp which = naught. my best guess is that the cylinder head ports or valves are restrictive. Anyone hauled the heads of a 240? if so, are the ports or valves to small.
similarly how close are the water channels to the ports and valves. how big a valve could i go. lastly whats the combustion design like. is it a fuel friendly anti power 'D shape' job?
and.. what are the cam profiles like in terms of duration and lift. Are the standard cams to mild...
whats the weakest link
abtex
Last edited by abtex; Jun 17, 2004 at 05:41 PM.
