CLK and E 55 Performance tip
FWIW, my first long drive with the "heat shield" yesterday surprised me in that the temp needle that normally sits just below the 100 C mark (the first one above the 80)was pegged just above the 80 mark! I don't know but I think that's significant. I realize the gauge is probably not that accurate but to show that much of a change is pretty good to me. I DID notice a smoother acceleration and cruise and a 1 MPG improvement on the computer (21 vs 20) over a tankful.
Last night it was hot, when I arrived 88°F, at last and best run 80°F, wind was low, air was humid, here are my results, I know if I had had the same weather conditions like in march I would've turned better numbers, nevertheless I was the car to beat last night, I ran and won to a 99 Z28, a 2002 Camaro SS (two times), 2001 TransAm, and a 99 TranAm shooting NOS did beat me.
Worst time 13.496 @ 104.56 (88°F 6:25 pm)
Mid time 13.423 @ 105.13 (7:10 pm)
Best time 13.333 @ 105.23 (80°F 8:29 pm)
I need opinions and more educated (if possible) thought about the times, cold weather vs hot weather.
I do belive the "heatshield" works, I'll be re-doing it a better and neater way this time.
A 10 degree difference in air intake temp is worth approx 3% power (you can this confirm this approximation by checking correction factor on dyno with intake temp change).
On a 3800lb car each 10 crank hp is worth approx .14sec over the 1/4 mile.
All things being equal, if you can run a 13.35 @ 80degrees ambient, you should run a 13.1, or better @ 60 degrees ambient.
Isolating the engine heat from the airbox and pipes does work, it might be worth 10-12 hp. I say it is well worth considering I spent $ 42.95 dlls on this extra tenth in the quarter mile.
My next "target" are the ribs and lip on the roof of the airbox. I know i am carrying on, but i am convinced that they kill air flow. Time to pull out the trusty Dremmel.
Stephens, be careful about "porting and polishing" the interior of the airbox. The engineers may have designed them to do something. Case in point, on the CLK55, and maybe the E55, if you trace and look closely as to where the actual intake of those double hoses start, the "ram" effect is basically blocked. I peeked and poked in there and for the life of me, when you put the hood down, the metal piece between the parking light and the grill sits directly in front of the ram opening. Then the opening even has these walls to direct the intake straight from the front...a metal wall! So like you, I took the dremel and the drill and cut away (the plastic sidewalls). When I posted this on another forum, one of the guys there posted a picture of a stock grill of a 230 I think, that actually had a piece of plastic placed directly in front of the intake...designed from the factory. Go figure.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
FYI E55 cold air intake is not blocked, but I know some models are. I don't believe are done for aerodynamic reasons, just bad design. My initial thoughts were that the top of the air box was so badly designed, that it must be intentional, to create turbulance. However, basic intake design dictates that the last thing that you want, or need, is turbulent air just before the MAS. Whilst the AMG motor is a great improvement on the standard 5.0L, I have been less than impressed by some of it's design aspects.
I am no expert by any means, but having raced and developed GP bikes and GTP cars, I think I have a good basic understanding. Having a degree in applied mathematics and reading too much helps I suppose.
Last edited by stephens; May 11, 2002 at 09:13 PM.
You are getting fantastic 1/4 times given your terminal speed. I am getting similar times but with terminal speeds of 111-113mph,
my problem is traction. What launch technique are you using?
I also am warming up my tires, I do go thru the water trap and burn a little, running 28 psi on rears and 38 psi on front tires.
Once I tried launching at 1500 rpm, it spun like nuts, so I gave up power braking.
60' times are always 2.016 to 2.058, the time I spun I did 2.257
After I cut and drilled my poorly designed intake, I stood back and said " Oh ****, what if I wasn't supposed to do that?
If you DO try to port that airbox, please let us know the results...
I have redesigned the airflows by putting a bevel on the bottom lip, where the airbox joins the funnel section at the rear of the assembly that attaches to the MAS, which is square standard, removed all the cross ribs, removed the square step on the top lip and separated the airbox sections for the two filters in an effort to get rid of the turbulance and smooth the flows..
Has anyone with a MKB on Renntech airbox had a look at the differences?
I'll take the car out tomorrow night with the trusty G-Tech and see if there is any measurable performance increase/decrease.
Regards
Yes, this is a different aluminium tape, used for welding. I opened the box up last night after 3/4 hour of "performance" testing and the inside top of the box was cool to touch.
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/actionfit/webpage1.html
Look at the link to my webpage to see what my intake looks like.
Thanks
Subman


