Any have/tried staggered wheel diameters?
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norcal
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 Nissan 350Z
Any have/tried staggered wheel diameters?
Has any tried staggering wheel diameters say 17F/18R or 18F/19R? I wonder if that would throw off our ESP completely.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230 : 2007 C230
Originally Posted by ronnie0738
Has any tried staggering wheel diameters say 17F/18R or 18F/19R? I wonder if that would throw off our ESP completely.
Here is an example that would work on W202 & W203:
F = 225/45-17x7.5
R = 255/35-18x9
I don't think I would like this look....
#5
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMG C43, 1999
You could run a 255/40/17 front and a 265/35/18 rear. That would put tire size very close and might look decent.
You can run a 255/40/17 front if you pull the fenders a little and have a 8.5"x17", ET 35mm, front rim
Jeff
You can run a 255/40/17 front if you pull the fenders a little and have a 8.5"x17", ET 35mm, front rim
Jeff
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by ronnie0738
Has any tried staggering wheel diameters say 17F/18R or 18F/19R? I wonder if that would throw off our ESP completely.
#7
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norcal
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 Nissan 350Z
overall wheel diameter on the C32 are close between the front & rear (24.9 & 24.7). i think if you match the sidewall width it should look ok....just a thought.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by ronnie0738
overall wheel diameter on the C32 are close between the front & rear (24.9 & 24.7). i think if you match the sidewall width it should look ok....just a thought.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 430
I think it would look fine. Vette's used have staggered wheel sizes and the crossfire currently does it
#11
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norcal
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 Nissan 350Z
opps, i didnt mean keeping the sidewalls the same just the overall diameters. I think the difference in sidewall height would be 1-1.5cm.
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK32
I was aware of what he was talking about. I was using staggered to refer to different height wheels vs width.
My plan for the SLK32 is if/when I replace my wheels I will run 17's in front and 18's in back. Why you might ask would I want to do that? I personally would rather stick with 17's all around but they do not make tires in the dimensions I want to run in 17's. I am interested in wheels & tires from a performance standpoint not cosemetic. I do not think that you will see much if any improvement by running 18's all around not to mention the increase in unsprung weight.
My plan for the SLK32 is if/when I replace my wheels I will run 17's in front and 18's in back. Why you might ask would I want to do that? I personally would rather stick with 17's all around but they do not make tires in the dimensions I want to run in 17's. I am interested in wheels & tires from a performance standpoint not cosemetic. I do not think that you will see much if any improvement by running 18's all around not to mention the increase in unsprung weight.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 430
I do not think that you will see much if any improvement by running 18's all around not to mention the increase in unsprung weight.
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK32
Originally Posted by vadim
That's correct - nor will you see any improvement by using 18" vs. 17" in the back only for the same reason you quoted. On top of that, it would look silly.
My thoughts with the 18's in back is that the added width will allow for better traction, esp. in a straight line.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 430
I am not sure it will look silly. I have not gotten far enough into the process to search for photo's (I think one of the guys is running this setup) or photochop one.
My thoughts with the 18's in back is that the added width will allow for better traction, esp. in a straight line.
My thoughts with the 18's in back is that the added width will allow for better traction, esp. in a straight line.
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK32
Originally Posted by vadim
Diameter and width are not related. You would be better off using wider 17" wheels if performance if the goal, as 18" wheels are heavier (see your own previous post). Race cars never use big rims for that same reason.